Thorny Way of Truth
(bilingual, in English and
Polish)
Updated:
12 October 2013
Click "X" or "No" on e.g. messages of supposed errors, or on advertisements, if these try to interrupt your viewing of this web page.
Here
is the list of all web pages which should
be available at this address (i.e. from this
server), arranged by language (in 8 languages).
It represents a more frequently updated version
of "Menu 1". Choose below the page that interests
you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
web page to run it:
(The same list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 2.)
Here is the list of addresses of all
totaliztic web sites that still worked
at the date of the most recent update
of this web page. At each of these addresses
should be available all totaliztic web pages
listed in "Menu 1" or
"Menu 2",
including also their different language versions
(i.e. versions in languages:
Polish, English, German, French, Spanish, Italian,
Greek or Russian.) Thus firstly select
the address which you wish to open by dragging
scroll bars in small window below, then click on
this address to run it. When opens the web
page which represents this address, then choose
from its "Manu 1" or
"Menu 2"
the web page which interests you and click on it
to view that page:
(The above list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 4.)
Some philosophers claim contrary to
our experience and everyday logic,
that so-called "objective truths"
do NOT exist at all. But our intuition,
life experience, and also
moral laws
state something opposite. According
to these, objective truths do exist!
Only that, according to an old English
proverb, "truth lies at the bottom
of a well". Of course, truth did not fall
to this well all by itself, but a sort of
devil
must throw it there on purpose. After all,
devils have reasons to hide truth from
people. Therefore, in order to reach
somehow to this truth, we firstly need
to withdraw a whole well of "water"
which covers it. In addition to this,
even if there are people who already
know this truth, they are not eager to
tell it openly to others. After all, "truth
finds foes where it makes none".
No wonder that on our planet truths
are forced to march long distances
exclusively over thorny pathways before
they get to the awareness of people.
Part #A:
Introductory information of this web page:
#A1.
Goals of this web page:
The most vital goal of this web page is to
explain the official stand of the
philosophy of totalizm
in matters of truth. The web page has also
an additional goal, which is to indicate
most important truths which presently are
tendentiously hidden from people and
replaced with corresponding untruths.
In addition to the above, this web page indicates
free source materials, such as scientific monographs
[1/4] or
[8/2],
as well as totaliztic web page - for example pages
immortality.htm,
soul_proof.htm,
ufo_proof.htm,
god_proof.htm, or
evolution.htm,
which accepted the honourable
responsibility of disseminating amongst
people most vital amongst suppressed
truths. (Please notice, that in order to
increase the reliability of this web page,
all publications that are made available
through it, are also available under several
other internet addresses.)
#A2.
Why this web page tries to disseminate general information about truth, as well as unpopular truths:
With the learning and disseminating truths
is identically as with climbing to a higher
level on a slope of hill. After all, our knowledge
of truth gives to us a better understanding
and views of the reality which surround us,
similarly like climbing higher uphill gives to
us a better views of the surrounding landscape.
In turn we all know jolly well, why the climbing
uphill is so difficult and why it consumes so
much human effort. The reason is that we are
also climbing uphill of a field that is invisible
to human sight. But why the learning, telling,
and disseminating truth also always comes
with such a great difficulty? The reason turns
out exactly the same - i.e. truth also always
lies uphill in a field that remains invisible to
the human eyes and that is called the
moral field.
(This "moral field", together with "moral laws"
and "moral energy", belong to a foundation
quantities on which is based the essence of the
philosophy of totalizm.)
Thus learning or disseminating truth must
come to us equally difficult like any other
climbing uphill of an invisible field. But
learning and dissemination of truth is
coinciding with the action of so-called
moral laws
and earns us a very vital for living kind of
energy, called the
moral energy.
(Moral energy is like the potential energy
in physics - in order to increase it we need
to climb uphill of the moral field. But opposite
to the potential energy from physics, the
moral energy is absolutely necessary for
file - in fact it is a kind of "oxygen for the
spirit" for the lack of which people suffocate
(the more comprehensively this was explained
in chapter B of
monograph [8/2].)
Part #B:
Le us define the "totaliztic understanding of truth":
#B1.
Mutually linked terminology: "facts", "data", "information", "truths" and "untruths":
By the term "fact" we describe some raw
situation, object, or state, which can be
identified and unambiguously described.
An example of fact is the situation that e.g.
"my watch indicates 12:00".
One or more raw facts which we intend to subject
to some kind of processing is called "data".
AN example of data is the situation that "my
watch indicates 12:00" and the earlier finding
that "my watch gets late by 1 minute each 10
hours".
The result of our processing of "data" is called
an "information". An example of "information" is
finding that "on the basis of indications from my
watch and the error of indications which I managed
to establish earlier, I determined that just now is
12:05".
Every information cane be either "truth" or "untruth".
"Truth" is the information which faithfully, reliably,
and unambiguously reflects the reality which
surrounds us. (For even more precise definition
of "truth" see item #B3 below.) In turn "untruth"
is the information which is either a false reflection
of reality, or which does NOT reflect this reality
at all.
"Truths" should be clearly distinguished from "facts".
This is because a "fact" is a raw finding, which
still requires a processing in order to inform us
about a "truth". In turn "truth" is a correct information.
An example of "fact" is the finding that "my watch
indicates 12:00". (Means, without the analysis of
correctness of this indication of my watch we still
do NOT know what time really is.) In turn an example
of :truth" is the information that "just now is 12:00"
(of course, in order this information represents the
"truth", a "non-written assumption" must be fulfilled
that the person who states this "truth" was absolutely
sure that he announced it exactly at 12:00).
#B2.
"Fabrications" generate "facts" which have NO "cause-effect relationship" with the
corresponding "truths" - and thus which lead to a cunning taking "untruths" for "truths":
From the everyday life we know, that "facts"
indicate the "truth" only when no-one "fabricated"
these facts (nor nothing "manipulated" them)
in such a manner that it cut these facts from
the "cause-effect relationship" with the "truth"
that they point out. For example, if we are waiting
for a train, then the "truth" about a current
time we can read only from a clock which
was NOT shifted back intentionally by someone
e.g. to make us being late for the train, nor
which for some other reasons is late. The
above well known to everyone example points
our attention onto the destructive role of
"fabrications" of facts (or "manipulating" facts
by some natural factors). Namely, "facts"
which were "fabricated" by someone (or
"manipulated"), do NOT have the "cause-effect
relationship" with the "truth" which they point
out. Therefore, instead of indicating "truth",
in reality they misleadingly make us take
"untruth" for :truth".
The above logical deduction reveals to us that a
basic duty of everyone who seek "truth" is to make
sure that "facts" on which this someone tries to
establish a given "truth" are NOT "fabricated" by
someone (nor are "manipulated" by something).
But, as it is to be explained in "part #C" of this
web page, the "institution of official human
science, which supplies the humanity with a
largest number of "truths" about the surrounding
reality, completely fails the duty to make sure
that "facts" on which it bases these "truths"
were NOT "fabricated" e.g. by God".
In the result, a significant majority of "truths"
disseminated by present official science in
reality represents "untruths" - and thus in the
near future will need to be denied (similarly
as denied needed to be already numerous
"truths" disseminated by scientists of the past -
for a list of some of these past "untruths" see
subsection JB7.3 from volume 7 of
monograph [1/4]).
#B3.
What is this "totaliztic truth" - means a
totaliztic
definition of truth:
Dictionaries usually define the word "truth"
as (1) "conformity to knowledge, fact, or
logic", or as (2) "fidelity to an original or
standard" - see "Reader's Digest Universal
Dictionary", Sydney 1988, ISBN 0-86438-054-2,
page 1616. Of course, after such defining
truth, in many cases it may not exist,
in spite that our intuition states otherwise.
For example, if the reality which a given
truth supposed to reflect is a physical
object, while someone describes to us
this object with a spoken language, then
in whatever way we would establish the
conformity or fidelity between these two,
always words will be very distant from
a physical object.
On a separate web page named
totalizm.htm
a relatively new philosophy is described. The
main mission of this philosophy is to promote
moral way of living. In turn as we know, the
philosophical quality called "truth" represents
an essence of every version of moral way of
living. (In a similar manner as "spirit" constitutes
an essence of every form of alcohol.) Therefore,
when we wish to know what truth is, the best
thing to do is to learn the totaliztic definition
of this philosophical quality. So here is how the
most moral, progressive, and peaceful philosophy
on Earth called
totalizm
defines the concept of truth.
Truth is a kind of "model" or "image" which
we actively form in our mind on the basis
of raw findings, reports, or data, which
describe to us a fragment of objective reality,
which (the image) fulfils a whole list of rigorous
requirements that concern (A) unbiased
information which we receive on this topic,
(B) our active participation in the formation
of this image in our mind, (C) repetitive
confirmation of this image by ourselves
through matching it to a given fragment
of reality, etc.
#B4.
Is it possible, according to the philosophy of
totalizm,
to define the specific truth in an absolutely unambiguous manner:
An objective truth have this attribute, that it
always is dependent on the circumstances.
In other words, in order something was an
absolute truth, it must be described together
with circumstances in which it is absolutely
true. For example, if on the question "what
time it is" we reply that "just is 12:00", this
is just a part of the truth - even if our watch
really just indicates 12:00. After all, on the
other hemisphere, or on an other watch,
can be a completely different time. So in
order to be more correct in our reply, we
would need to state "for people from our
hemisphere, according to indications of
my watch is just 12:00". But even this statement
does NOT express all circumstances. After
all, e.g. we did NOT determine the precision
with which we are provide this time, nor the time
which takes to say this information, nor we
considered so-called winter time or summer
daylight saving time. Furthermore, each one
from the above circumstances still has links
to further circumstances (e.g. the hemisphere
depends on the manner we define the division
into hemispheres), which in turn are linked
to further circumstances, etc., etc. In the result
if we consider the matter increasingly more
accurately and strictly, then the "truth" about
e.g. time is linked to practically the entire knowledge
in existence about the entire universe. Thus in
order to tell someone an absolute truth, our
explanations would need to express it in the
light of the entire knowledge from the entire
universe.
Of course, passing to someone an objective truth
through expressing it in the light of the entire knowledge
of the universe, is impossible for practical reasons.
Thus in expressing truths we must always introduce
some simplifications. This is why totalizm states, that
an absolute truth in fact does exist, only that it
is impossible to unambiguous expressing. But
is possible to simplified expression of the absolute
truth, to which we give the level of correctness and
accuracy which suffices for practical applications
to which this truth supposed to serve.
#B5.
The graphical symbol of "truth" - means the logo of totalizm:
Truth has its own symbol. It is so-called
"logo of totalizm". (More information on
this logo is provided in subsection H1
from the monograph
[8/2] entitled "Totalizm".)
Here is how this logo looks like:
Fig. #1: Here is the graphical symbol of "truth", means the "logo of totalizm".
Because one amongst most fundamental principles and intentions
of totalizm is seeking truths and dissemination truths, while the above
logo is a graphical identifier of these people who act accordingly
to principles of totalizm, marking something with the logo of totalizm
is synonymous with the declaration, that a given user of this logo
has the intention to follow a path of truth.
ONly case when the placing somewhere the "logo
of totalizm" does NOT represent a declaration of
truth, are situations when this logo is abused by
some cheater who uses it to mask with it his
intention to cause misleading.
Totalizm
is the name for a new philosophy, which
is the most peaceful, most moral, the most
scientifically based, and the most progressive
out of all philosophies currently in existence
on Earth. This philosophy uses a very special
logo. This logo is of the shape of ellipsis,
with white and red symbols in it. It has an
extremely unusual history and quite a special
interpretation, both of which are comprehensively
explained in subsection N1 from volume 8 of monograph
[8/2] entitled "Totalizm".
(English version of monograph [8/2] can be downloaded
free of charge from almost all internet web sites listed in
the menu from the left margin of this page; addresses of
these pages one can also find, if asks any search engine
to look for the key words
totalizm.)
Logo of totalizm displays many very unusual
attributes. For example it emits quite special and positive
"configuration vibrations", which can be perceived with tools
of radiesthesia (e.g. by a divining pendulum or a divining rod).
It is also already widely known from its amazing healing properties,
and from the work as a powerful amulet that brings good luck in
business and in personal life. For example, web servers which have
web pages with this logo in them, are doing very well, while people
who carry this logo have events of their lifetimes when they have
this logo with them. You can find this logo at the front of every
internet web page which is devoted to the positive philosophy of totalizm.
* * *
Notice that you can see the enlargement
of each illustration from this web site, simply by clicking
on this illustration. Most of the Internet browsers that you may use,
allow also to download each
illustration to your own computer, and then look at it, reduce or
enlarge the size of it, or print it, with your own graphical software.
Part #C:
Let us notice that the majority of "truths" disseminated
by present official human science are actually "untruths" -
because scientists failed to take under consideration
that "facts" which led them to these "truths" in reality
were "fabrications":
"Facts" allow us to trace "truths" that are indicated
by them, only in cases when there is a "cause-effect
relationship" between these "facts" and "truths".
Therefore, for example "facts" which are "fabricated"
or "falsified" typically "lead us astray" and indicate
"untruths" instead of "truths". On the other hand
the human science takes "non-written assumptions"
that all "facts" discovered in the nature lead this
science to findings of "truths". But in our world
science should take under consideration, that at
least some "facts" identified in the nature were
"created" by God, means "fabricated". As such,
these "fabricated facts" do NOT lead to "truths"
because they do NOT have the "cause-effect
relationship" with these "truths". Therefore, in
the present situation of the humanity, the science
has NO right to adopt this "non-written assumption",
but should investigate every "fact" separately as to whether
it actually has the "cause-effect relationship" with
the "truth" which this "fact" indicates. Because the
science does NOT carry out such investigations of "facts",
almost all "truths" which it so-far discovered most
probably are "untruths". Therefore, this "part #C"
of the web page presents a logical deduction which
indicates, that a blind accepting by the science of this
"non-written assumption" that "the world in which
we live was NOT created, nor is governed, by God"
leads to situations when the majority of "truths"
determined by this science in reality are "untruths".
#C1.
In the universe created and ruled by
God
all "facts" in reality are "fabrications":
My logical analysis concerning the "non-written assumption"
taken without checking by the official human
science, were inspired by the television documentary
which I viewed in New Zealand television in 2008.
In this documentary a young mother was shown.
She was shocked by the medical finding that her
own child displays completely different genetics
than herself. This genetics suggested that the
child was NOT at all neither her, nor her husband,
although there was NO a physical reason why
it should be so. The birth was in the home - so
there was no possibility that the child could be
swapped with some other one. Also from the
very beginning the mother took notice of a special
mark on skin of this child, so that all the time
she had assurance that the child remains the
same. Furthermore, present modern information
systems allowed her to find several other similar
cases spread all over the world, in which the
certainty of biological motherhood was equally
sure, but still genetics of children differed from
genetics of parents. Then the documentary show
a scientist who carried out detailed research on
this and other similar cases. This scientist argued,
that such completely different genetic makeup of
a child can appear just by an accident. Although
this scientist used the scientific terminology which
sounded very learned, and although he contributed
a really impressive amount of research effort into
this puzzle of the nature, I personally found his
argumentation very naive. For example, he did
NOT even consider the possibility that various other
factors could be in action there which could be
different from a pure coincidence, nor he eliminated
logically possibilities of interferences from such
other factors. On the other hand, apart from
a pure coincidence, this different genetic makeup
of a child could also be caused by several other
factors - for example due to the use of this specific
mother by UFOnauts as a so-called "surrogate mother"
(for growing a foetus implanted by UFOnauts),
or due to a direct intervention from God (after
all, we do NOT know whether Jesus had the same
genetic makeup as the Virgin Mary had).
The matter of this child of a different genetic makeup
from his mother started to bother me. After all,
if the husband of this mother did NOT trust her
unreservedly, then he could win a case for divorce
in practically every court - no matter where the
truth really lied. Therefore, philosophical question
which I started to ask then, was whether in our
universe all "natural" facts have a direct "cause-effect
relationship" with the truth which they concern.
(In this case whether the fact of a "different genetic
makeup of a mother and a child" have a direct cause-effect
relationship with the truth "who is the biological mother
(and father) of this child".) With the elapse of time
this question transformed into a kind of "eye-opening"
philosophical problem.
The answer to this philosophical problem was provided
for me by the analysis of several other cases when "natural"
facts actually clearly contradicted "truths". This answer
states that only in the universe which is NOT
created nor ruled by God, natural facts have a
direct cause-effect relationship to truth that depend
on these facts. After all, only in such an universe
deprived of God, if something manifests itself, it always
must result from so-called "natural cause-effect chains".
This is because only such chains in this universe
would be able to govern the process of formation
of all objects and the course of all events. In the
universe without God such cause-effect chins would
represent the mechanism which causes the origins
of everything. Thus only in the universe without God,
finding e.g. bones of dinosaurs would really mean
that dinosaurs actually lived in there. This is because
the life of dinosaurs would be the only mechanism
in there which would be able to make these bones.
In turn, in the world created and ruled by God,
the only reason why something is created (thus
also the reason why it occurs) is the need of
God to accomplish specific goals. Thus, God
creates and shapes everything mainly in such
a manner, that with the use of it He is able to
accomplish His superior goals. In this way,
for example finding bones of dinosaurs in
the world created by God, may equally well
mean that God intentionally "fabricated" these
bones in order to inspire with them human
scientists to carry out creative investigations.
Or it may mean the intention of accomplishing
by God various other goals described in item
#A2 from the web page
evolution.htm.
After all, in the world that God created, He creates
everything anyway. Since He takes onto Himself
the trouble of creating everything, the most justified
is for Him such creating, which assures the fulfilment
of His Godly goals. In the result, in the world created
and ruled by God, everything may only look as if it
is ruled by the "natural cause-effect chains". After
all, in the process of creation and ruling God uses
the so-called "Canon of Ambiguity" described in
item #C2 of the web page
will.htm.
However, in reality it is NOT in the interest of God
that everything obeys the "natural cause-effect
chain", but it lies in His interest that it serves well
towards accomplishing God's superior goals. Therefore,
while analysing any "facts" from out surroundings,
we always should take under consideration that
in the world created and ruled by God, in the
vital interest of this God lies that "created" (i.e.
"fabricated") are these facts only which in the
best manner are to serve the God's goals - even
if these facts are completely separated from the
"truth" and they actually contradict the truth which
they supposedly indicate.
#C2.
There is a whole ocean of scientific evidence
that the world in which we live was really created
and is governed by
God -
and thus that human scientists have NO rights to
take a "non-written assumption" that all "facts" have
"cause-effect relationships" with "truths" that these
facts indicate:
In spite that the official human science
stubbornly repeats like a broken record
from an old gramophone, that God does
NOT exist, around us can be found, and
already was scientifically identified, an entire
ocean of scientific evidence for the existence
of God. A significant number of items of
this evidence was presented in the entirely
devoted to them totaliztic web page named
god_proof.htm.
Several further cases of such evidence are
indicated in item #B2 of the web page named
god.htm,
and in items #D3.1, #D1 and #D4 of the web page
fruit.htm.
Still another and rather unique example of just
such evidence, is presented in item #C6 below
on this web page.
Simultaneously with the existence of a wealth
of evidence for the existence of God, scientists
are NOT able to indicate even a shred of evidence
that God does NOT exist. On the other hand, as
this is reasoned in item #F3 of the totaliztic web page
bible.htm,
if something really does NOT exist, then this non-existence
can be scientifically proven. For example, it is
known that temperatures lower than an "absolute
zero" do NOT exist. Thus, it was scientifically proven
that such temperatures do NOT exist at all.
The availability of a wealth of scientific evidence
for the existence of God, means that the world
which surrounds us in reality was created and
is ruled by God. This in turn means that "facts"
are "created" (means "fabricated") by God and
in reality these "facts" do NOT have a "cause-effect
relationship" with "truths" at which they point out.
The consequence of this is such, that the taking
a "non-written assumption" by the official human
science, that "we live in a world which neither was
created by God, nor is ruled by God", is a gross
logical error which invalidates all "truths" that were
deduced by the science with the use of this assumption.
#C3.
Why the existence of bones of dinosaurs,
in the universe which was created by
God
only slightly over 6000 years ago,
confirms that God really "fabricates"
various "facts", and thus that "truths"
which the science deduced from these
fabricated "facts" in reality are "untruths":
In items #A1, #A2 and #E1 of the totaliztic web page
evolution.htm
described are outcomes of my research on
the actual age of our universe. As from this
research stems, the real age of the universe
is just slightly over 6000 years. There is also
an extensive wealth of evidence, that in reality
the age of the universe is so low. This wealth
of evidence is presented, amongst others, in
subsection JA1.3 from volume 6 of
monograph [8/2].
But present official human science, confronted
with various empirical findings regarding the nature,
e.g. amongst others confronted with bones of
dinosaurs, claims that the age of the universe
already amounts to around 14 billion of years.
The above findings provided me with an illustrative
confirmation, that in the universe ruled by God,
empirical evidence can be, and really is, "fabricated"
for important reasons in so misleading manner,
that this evidence is able to contradict the truth
and suggest a complete untruth.
The possibility of "fabrication" of "facts" in the
universe created and ruled by God has this
consequence that it undermines, and in practice
also completely invalidates, the to-date methods
of scientific investigations. It also invalidates and
categorises as erroneous all findings to-date
accomplished by the official science. After
all in almost all scientific investigations a
"non-written assumption" is taken, that "facts"
occurred in the world which neither was created
nor is ruled by God, and thus in which there is
NO an intelligent superior being which for
accomplishing some superior goals is able to
"fabricate" facts. On the other hand, for
scientists to be allowed to take such a "non-written
assumption" in their investigations, firstly they
would need to prove formally that our physical
world is neither created nor ruled by God.
Unfortunately, official human science, neither
presented such a proof so-far, nor even ever
will be able to form a proof for the non-existence
of omnipotent God. After all, as this is illustrated
on the totaliztic web page
god_proof.htm,
there is a wealth of scientific evidence that in
spite of everything God does exist, and that
this God created the physical world, and He
continually rules over our world. On the other
hand, there is no even a shred of evidence
in support of claims of scientists, that God
supposedly does NOT exist, and thus that it
is NOT God who created the physical world.
Of course, through taking the above "non-written
assumption" - which turns out to be false, the
official human science commits a basic error
of logical reasoning. Thus the consequence
of taking by the official human science such
a "non-written assumption" that "our world is
the world without God", is that all scientific
findings to-date can be untrue.
#C4.
The footprints of a man hundreds of millions years old
are another confirmation that in the universe created
and ruled by
God
"facts" can be "fabricated" and thus NOT each one
of them supports the "truth" which seems to stem from it:
Independently from bones of dinosaurs, on
the Earth various other strange "facts" and
"evidence" is being found, which also display
attributes of God's "fabrications". For example,
some findings seem to suggest, that on our
planet technically highly advanced people
used to walk already around 550 millions years
ago. Although the official human science ignores
and hides these findings, because they lie
in open contradiction to the official doctrines
of present science, until today a lot of such
"facts" was collected. To these belong for example
imprints of human shoes around 550 million years
old. (Such imprints are shown, amongst others,
in "Fig. #F1" from the web page
god.htm,
in "Fig. #B1" from the web page
evil.htm,
or in "Fig. #5" from the web page
ufo.htm.)
In geological layers from that period are also
being found various metal products of advanced industry.
Thus, if we accept this "non-written assumption"
which is adopted currently by the official human
science, that "the Earth was NOT created nor is
ruled by omnipotent God", then such findings
and facts would prove conclusively that people
walked over the Earth already around 550 million
of years ago. Means, that either already then
some relatives of humans used to arrive to
the Earth from space (e.g. in order to seed
the life on the Earth), or already then existed
on the Earth some advanced technical
civilisation of humans, similar to our present
one. But is it really true that people walked
then over the Earth?
If we accept the fact, that the Earth and people
were created and presently are ruled by God,
then it turns out that for various important reasons
God could decide to "fabricate" (i.e. to "create"
and then to introduce into appropriate geological
layers) this body of evidence for the existence of
people on the Earth already around 550 million
years ago. After all, for the "fabrication" of this
evidence could inspire God e.g. any reason
listed in item #A2 from the web page
evolution.htm.
So let us consider now whether there is any
evidence in support of the thesis, that these
findings of footprints and other evidence of
the presence of humans on the Earth already
around 550 million years ago, in fact were
"fabricated" by God for important reasons.
Here are examples of such evidence:
(a)
The evidence that the physical world exists only for slightly
over 6000 years. This means that around 550 million
years ago the Earth still was NOT created yet. The material
evidence for this fact was already indicated as presented
in subsection JA1.3 from volume 6 of
monograph [8/2].
(b)
The evidence that cosmic relatives of humans do NOT
exist in the permanent manner, but their temporary
manifestations are repetitively "simulated". A wealth
of such evidence is presented on totaliztic web pages.
Examples of these include the content of item #F7 from the web page
evil.htm,
or item #D2 from the web page
ufo.htm.
(c)
The evidence that around 550 million years ago there
were no enough living organisms on the Earth to support
the life of a large group of people, or the existence of
a technical human civilisation. For example, out
of living organisms which remains lasted from that times
until today, there are just so-called "trilobites" (i.e. a kind
of like primitive crayfish). These trilobites in turn are NOT
enough to provide food for a larger group of people.
In order to summarise the above, in the light of
what we already know, people could not walk
on the Earth around 550 million years ago for
a simple reason that neither the Earth, nor the
physical world, were already created then. Thus,
"facts" and "evidence" which are being found,
that at such early time people were already
walking over the Earth, are another confirmation,
that for many vital reasons God "fabricates" some
"facts" - in this number also supposed "evidence"
described here. This in turn reveals to us additionally,
that the human researchers should be very careful
how these God's "fabrications" are interpreted by
them.
#C5.
The conclusion of the above logical deduction
which documented that accepting by human
science the "non-written assumption" that
"we do NOT live in the world created and ruled by
God",
causes the dissemination of "absurd" by science
instead of "truths":
Previous items of this web page presented the
logical deduction of the character of a formal
proof, in which it was proven on the existing
and commonly known evidence, that various
claims disseminates by the official human science
as "truth" in fact represent a "pile of rubbish".
Thus, no-one who has truth in heart, should
unreservedly believe in whatever present
scientists officially claim.
This untruthfulness of "truths" disseminated officially
by science results from a logical error which the
human science committed in very foundations of
its investigations. Namely, scientists accept in
their investigations the erroneous "non-written
assumption", that "the world in which we live was
NOT created by God, thus every "fact" that exists
in nature displays a "cause-effect relationship" with
the "truth" that it indicates. However, the logical
deductions provided before indicate, that in reality
in which we live this assumption cannot be taken,
as the existing evidence indicates that it is untrue.
The logical erroneousness of taking the "non-written
assumption" discussed here, was proven above in
several steps of logical deduction. Namely, at the
very beginning it was asserted that (1) if the world
was created by God, then all "facts" are also "created"
by God, means are "fabricated". In turn such
"fabricated facts" have NO "cause-effect relationship"
with "truth" which they indicate. Then it was proven
that (2) the world in which we live actually contains
evidence that it was "created" and is ruled by God,
and thus that "facts" existing in it were in reality
"created", means "fabricated" by this God. Next
it was proven that (3) already on the present level
of our knowledge it is possible to detect and to
indicate a number of "facts" which were intentionally
"fabricated" by God in order to mislead scientists
who analyse them, and thus in order to express
"untruths" as "truths". Finally it was proven that
(4) the founding of scientific research on "facts"
without checking whether these "facts" have a
"cause-effect relationship" with "truths" that they
indicate, completely undermines the reliability
of findings from such research - means causes
that instead of "truths" this research disseminates
"untruths". To conclude the above, the logical
deduction provided here indicated conclusively
and in the verifiable to everyone manner, that
present human science disseminates numerous
"untruths" claiming that these are "truths".
This conclusion reveals, that every person who
has truth in heart, should cease to believe
unreservedly in claims of present official science -
unless these claims were verified and confirmed by the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
or by the philosophy called
totalizm.
#C6.
The fact, that all religions of the world state exactly
the same, and thus that all of them must be
authorised by one and the same superior being,
is another example of evidence, that our world
was created and is ruled by one and always the same
God:
Everyone who learns more than one religion,
easily is going to notice, that all religions of
the world state precisely the same "truths".
In other words, all religions of the world describe
exactly the same process of shaping our world and
the reality in which we live, the creation of man,
as well as precisely the same requirements of
human living in the surrounding reality. So even
a rough analysis of statements of subsequent
religions reveals, that all religions of the world
must have exactly the same author, and that
the author of these religions must be one and
always the same supernatural being, who knew
absolutely everything about our world (means
it must be one and always the same God).
On the same principle as experienced teachers
always are able to determine correctly that
the author of a whole group of homework essays
was one and the same student, we currently are
also able to determine conclusively, that the author
of all religions of the world was one and always
the same God. This in turn proves unambiguously
a whole array of absolute "truths". For example,
it proves that in spite of denials of science, God
does exist. It proves that there is just one God.
It also proves, that in spite various religions use
different names for their God, and also in spite
that in descriptions of this God the religions use
various examples, situations, and terminology,
still all of them describe the only existing God and
one and the same process of creation of the world
and man by that single God
Item #C2 of this web page indicated links and
references to examples of very extensive
scientific evidence which certifies that
God does exist, and thus that our physical
world was created and is ruled by this God.
In order to save the reader from seeking
these references and examples, below in
this item I am going to present still another
example of just such evidence. This example
indicates unambiguously the existence of
God, and it additionally indicates that all the
religions of the world state exactly the same
truth, means that all religions of the world
must have one and always the same
supernatural author which must be the only
existing God. The example described in this
item indicates also, that even if given religions
originated from areas which were isolated from
the rest of the world, such as e.g. New Zealand,
and even if they were formed in ages which
differ by several thousands years from each
other, still they state exactly the same. In turn
such consistent likeness of statements
of all religions of the world, does NOT have
any other explanation apart from the fact,
that the author of all these religions is
always the same supernatural creature,
means always the same and the only existing God.
Of course, present atheistic scientists do NOT
have the courage to admit that the "close similarity
(almost identity) in statements of all religions of
the world in fact confirms that all religions of the
world are authorised by one and always the same
God" - as it is empirically proven in further part
of this item. Therefore these atheistic scientists
try to find some imagined arguments to contradict
this fact. When we discuss with them we can be
sure that they are going to tell us that e.g. "the
close similarity statements of all religions results
from the principle on which works human mind",
or that e.g. the "close similarity of statements of
all religions results from similar environmental
conditions in which all humans live". Fortunately
it is NOT difficult to prove the basic error of such
atheistic argumentation. This is because we do
have on the Earth another structures, which are
very similar to religions, but which in their entirety
were invented by people. These structures very
similar to "religions" are "political systems".
A "political system" of every country is like
a separate "religion". The government of every
country is like the institution of church in a
given separate religion. In turn principles and
doctrines that formulate this political system
are like principles and doctrines of a religion.
For example, a political principle that "every
unemployed has a right to receive an unemployment
benefit" is an equivalent to a religious principle
that "every believer has the right to earn entry to
heavens". In turn the political principle that "the
good of many outweighs the good of a few"
(understood as an opposite to the political principle
that "the good of a few important or rich people outweighs
the good of the rest of society") is equivalent to a
religious principle that "God invented and created
people" (as an opposite to the claims of atheists
that "people created-invented God"). So if really
the mutual similarities of all religions are caused
by people, NOT by the God's authorship of all
religions, then "political systems" of all countries
also should say exactly the same - e.g. that "every
unemployed from each country deserves an unemployment
benefit (dole)", or that e.g. "in all countries the good
of many should outweigh the good of a few". However,
if one looks at different political systems invented
by people, then e.g. "the unemployment benefit (dole)"
only in a few sparse countries of the world is granted
to practically all unemployed people (e.g. it is so in
Australia). There are countries, e.g. New Zealand,
in which the unemployment benefit is granted to
only around 32% unemployed - means to less than
every third unemployed (for details see the article
"Ease rules on dole for couples say economists" from newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
Monday, June 29, 2009, page A1). We also know,
that there are countries, e.g. Zimbabwe, in which
none unemployed receives a dole. Similarly is
with the political doctrine that "the good of many
outweighs the good of a few". This doctrine was
practiced in a few sparse countries of the world.
For example, in years 1982 to 1984 I was delighted
to enjoy this doctrine in New Zealand ruled then
by probably the best leader which this country
ever had (and surely the best leader I ever knew),
i.e. ruled by the late Sir Robert Muldoon
(1921-1992). But when in 1984 the party of Sir
Robert Maldoon lost the elections, in the same New
Zealand this doctrine was replaced by an exact
opposite of it, i.e. by the political doctrine that
"the good of a few influential and rich people is outweighing
the good of many citizens". This new doctrine is
practiced in New Zealand until today. This is because
of it, that in New Zealand a referendum needed to
be carried out on 1 to 20 August 2009, to persuade
the government to withdraw the law that the government
imposed onto the nation. The referendum asked citizens:
"Should a smack as part of good parental
correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?" -
for details of this referendum see item #B5.1
from the totaliztic web page
will.htm.
To summarise this paragraph, the huge diversity of
statements of political systems created by people -
but displaying a significant analogy with religions,
conclusively proves that the "close similarity in statements
of all religions of the world in fact confirms that
these religions are authorised by one and always
the same God".
In item #J5 of totaliztic web page
wszewilki_jutra_uk.htm
it was indicated, that learning the reality around
us can be compared to a climbing upwards of a
vertical and smooth wall. For as long as there is
NO scientific theory created which described and
explains this reality, the climbing is practically
almost impossible. After all, the climber has NO
tool nor support which would facilitate his efforts.
But when such a descriptive theory is created,
then it works like a ladder or a scaffold attached
to this wall. The climber can now support on this
theory in his efforts to learn.
For as long as the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
was NOT created yet, the human analyses of
subsequent religions did NOT make any sense.
After all, these religions used different names
and terminologies, were based on different
examples, and explained matters from different
points of view. But when finally the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
(and the
philosophy of totalizm
which stems from it), explained to us precisely
almost all basic matters related to God, for example
explained what God really is, how God evolved,
what are three basic components of God,
what are principles of moral behaviour which
God passes to people with the aid of religions
that this God established, etc., then rapidly it
turned out that all religions in the world make
a perfect sense, and that all of them say the
same truths. It also turned out, that all religions
in the world use an ancient terminology with
various examples and comparisons to pass to
people exactly the same messages as with the
modern language of science explains to us
this Concept of Dipolar Gravity and the
philosophy of totalizm. In order to document
here this perfect correspondence of statements of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
and all religions of the world, below I am going
to explain in subsequent items all key attributes
of God that result from this concept and from the
philosophy of totalizm
inspired by it. Then I will prove on the existing evidence,
that exactly the same attributes of God are in various
ways described also in practically all religions of the world.
Because the discussion of all religions of the world
would exceed the humble size of this web page,
I am going to analyse below only three most representative
religions of the world, namely (1) "Christianity" - which
is the most well known religion to all people, (2) "Hinduism" -
which is the oldest religion of the world, and (3)
the religion of ancient Greeks - which is the most
scoffed at by present people. (Because ancient
Romans practiced exactly the same religion (3) as
ancient Greeks did, only that they changed into
their own all names of Gods used in it, the analysis
below describes simultaneously the religion of ancient
Romans. In a similar manner it describes also
the old religion of New Zealand Maoris - as it is
explained near the end of this item.) So here is
this presentation of exact correspondence between
key attributes of God in examples of religions of
the world analysed here:
1.
The "Holy Trinity" - means the three basic components
of God. The
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
explains to us that
God
in fact is a kind of a "natural computer", which is composed
from three basic components, namely from: (1) "hardware"
which is a kind of eternally existing "thinking liquid" called
the "counter-matter", (2) "software" which naturally self-evolved
in this "liquid hardware", means a kind of gigantic natural
"program of God", and (3) "peripherals" means our physical
world (and people) which this natural "program of God"
forms in a software way from the "counter-matter". More
comprehensive descriptions of these three main components
of God are provided on several web pages of totalizm,
e.g. in items #C2 to #C4 of the web page
god_proof.htm,
in item #B1 and #B5 to #B7 of the web page
evolution.htm,
in item #B5 of the web page
god.htm, and
in item #C1 of the web page
soul_proof.htm.
As it turns out, exactly the same three basic components
of God are explained by practically every religion
in the world. This is because practically every
religion in the world describes the so-called
"Holy Trinity", as the three major components
of God which at the beginning of times clarified
themselves from the "chaos" of the initial universe.
In a best way we know this "Holy Trinity" from
the "Christianity". And so, (1) the "hardware"
component of the "Holy Trinity" in the Christianity
most frequently is called the "God Father". But in the
Bible also other names are used, e.g. the "Ancient
of Days" - see Daniel 7:9, 7:13, and 7:22. In turn,
(2) the "software" component of the "Holy Trinity"
in the Christianity is called the "Holy Ghost". Finally,
(3) the "peripheral" component of the "Holy Trinity"
in the Christianity is called the "Son of God" - while
symbolically it is represented by Jesus (who actually
represents all people and the entire physical world).
In "Hinduism" God also is composed from the
"Holy Trinity". Only that otherwise than in Christianity,
Hinduism described the major function (not the nature)
of subsequent components of God. And so, (1)
the "hardware" component of the only God in
Hinduism is called "Brahma" - means the "Creator".
After all, it is from this "hardware" that formed is
practically everything that fills up the entire universe.
Furthermore, it was in this hardware that the
"software" component of God evolved naturally.
In turn, (2) the "software" component of God,
in Hinduism is called "Vishnu" (or "Krishna") -
means the "preserver". After all, these are
programs of this "preserver" that maintain
states and action of the universe. Finally
(3) the "peripheral" component of the only God
in Hinduism is called "Siva - means the "destroyer".
After all, in the physical world everything
is subjected to a destruction pretty fast.
No many people are aware, that the same "Holy
Trinity" was described also by the religions of
ancient Greeks and Romans - which were
very similar to each other. Only that in these
two religions the descriptions concentrate on
explaining the mechanism of beginnings of God
and the universe. Also, these two religions do not use
the name "Holy Trinity". The component (1) "hardware"
of this "Holy Trinity" from the religion of ancient Greeks
was called "Tartarus" - because it was located in
the same area as the "world of dead" (i.e. the
"counter-world") - which emerged first from the
initial "Chaos". The component (2) "software"
ancient Greeks called "Eros" means "love".
It is interesting that the world "love" for ancient
people represented perfectly the abstract qualities
which presently we call "programs" or "software"
or "algorithms", and which in the Biblical Evangel
of St. John 1:1-10 is called with the terminology
"word" (in the meaning of "information" or "program").
Finally (3) the "peripheral" component of the
"Holy Trinity" in the religion of ancient Greeks
was called "Gaia" or "Ge" - means the "earth".
After all, it represented the "matter" from our
physical world.
2.
The existence in the universe of just a single superior
being (i.e. just a single God) which, however, can
manifest itself to people in many different manners.
The
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
explains to us, that in spite of being composed from
as many as three separate components, God is a
single superior creature - similarly as a computer
is a single device in spite that it is composed of
(1) "hardware", (2) "software", and (3) "peripherals".
A similar message is also stated by all religions of
the world. Unfortunately, in Christianity the individual
name for this single God, which has three components,
at the moment seems to be lost or non-used for
political reasons. (In spite of the warning provided in
the biblical Revelation, 22:18-19, that - quote "I warn
everyone who hears the prophetic words in this book:
if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues
described in this book, and if anyone takes away from
the words in this prophetic book, God will take away his
share in the tree of life and in the holy city described
in this book.", still the Bible turns out to be the most
altered book of the world - see also item #C4 from the web page
bible.htm.)
But in old Bibles the individual name for God was stated
as "Yahweh" - still present in various older translations
of the Bible, see in there verses from Psalms 83:18 or Exodus 6:3.
(The name "Yahweh" for the whole God, stems from so
called Hebrew tetragrammaton "YHWH" and usually
is translated as the "True God".) In Hinduism, this
single only God is called "Brahman". In turn, in religions
of the ancient Greece and Rome the individual name
for this single God also seemed to be lost or non-used -
like it happens in present Christianity. But this God had
a general name of "Holiness" - as it represented a common
element which was present in all carriers of this "Holiness",
means in all ancient "Gods". Furthermore, this only God had
the individual name "Io" in the old religion of New Zealand
Maoris - whose religion was almost identical to that of
ancient Greece and Rome.
3.
The omnipresence of God and His ability to do billions
of things at the same time.
The
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
explains to us, that otherwise than it is with people, who
are able to do just a single thing at a time, God is able
to carry out billions of activities simultaneously. This
His extraordinary ability God accomplished due the
formation of His hardware and software composition
into the shape of a natural "multiprocessor computer".
It means, that similarly as people can be compared
to PCs with just single "microprocessors" (i.e. with a
single "Intel"), God is like a "supercomputer" which
has billions of "processors" working in parallel. Each
one amongst these billions of "processors" is able to
carry out actions independently from others, although
all of them have the same awareness, knowledge, memory,
etc. Thus God is able to do billions of actions at once.
Such an omni-powerful capability of God is confirmed
in practically all religions of the world.
Because of its simplified descriptions and brief
Bible, the "Christianity" does NOT explain "how"
and "why" God is able to carry out these billions
of activities at the same time. Therefore the Christianity
is satisfied with informing faithful, that God is
omnipresent and omnipotent, and that it sees
and does everything at once.
Extremely precise "Holy Scriptures" of Hinduism
explain this capability of God quite thoroughly.
They reveal that God, while is just a single being,
in fact has many "personalities" called "deities".
(Today such "deities" we would explain as the
"simulated" by God "biological composites".
These "composites" are formed through combining
together human-looking bodies - which God
temporarily creates for the duration of completing
a given interaction with humans. To each body
God links directly His own mind, thus passing
to it, amongst others, the selected "personality"
which is characteristic to this specific "deity".
On the same principle as in past God created
these "deities", presently God temporarily "simulates"
"UFOnauts", while not long ago God simulated
"devils" and "angels" - for more information see
item #D2 on the totaliztic web page
ufo.htm,
or item #J2 on the totaliztic web page
aliens.htm.)
Each one of these personalities is able to carry
out own actions and take own decisions independently
from others, although each one of them shares
the knowledge and awareness of the entire only God.
The religion of the ancient Greeks this ability of
the God to carry out many activities at once explains
through the introduction of many independent
"gods", however each one of which is characterised
by the "Holiness" common to all of them. In turn
these "gods" are simply different names to creatures
temporary "simulated" by God, which in Hinduism
are called "deities" and which were already described
in the previous paragraph.
4.
The existence of afterlife. "Why" people have the
afterlife, by the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
is explained in item #C3 of the totaliztic web page
soul_proof.htm.
This existence of afterlife stems from the fact, that one
amongst three components of every person, is a kind
of immortal natural "program" popularly called a
"soul". As it turns out, the fact of existence of
afterlife is explained to people by practically all
religions of the world (although the logic states that
if the authors of these religions were completely
different beings - instead of a single and always the
same God, then NOT all religions should inform
about the existence of afterlife).
5.
The moral requirements imposed onto the physical
life of people. All religions impose onto people
exactly the same moral requirements. For example,
all of them forbid killing, lying, cheating, etc. But
rarely religions explains "why" these commandments
were introduced. Explanations "why" provides to us only the
philosophy of totalizm -
due to revealing that on the intellectual level in the
universe active are three quantities, called the "moral
field", the "moral energy", and the "moral laws"
(see also item #A2 above).
* * *
Extremely intriguing for me personally is the
old religion of New Zealand Maoris (I.e. the
religion which was practiced by Maoris before
they adopted the Christianity around 1840.)
Maoris inhabit remote islands which since
the beginning of times were cut off from
contacts with the rest of the world. Therefore,
if the real authors of their religion would be
they themselves, then this religion should be
drastically different from all other religions
of the world. But in reality the old religion
of Maoris is almost an exact copy of the
religion of ancient Greeks and Romans.
Only that Maoris used their own names
for subsequent personalities of God (i.e.
for their "gods"). For example, what in the
religion of Greeks was called the initial
"Chaos" of the early universe, Maoris
called "Po". Their Greek-like "Holy Trinity"
Maoris called: (1) "Rangi" (i.e. "sky") - for
the "hardware" component (described by
them as "male"), (2) "Tane" (i.e. the "creator of the world") - for
the "software" component (also described
as "male"), and (3) "Papa" (i.e. "earth") -
for the "peripheral" component (described
by them as "female"). Maoris had even
their own equivalent to the Greek "Heracles"
(means the Roman "Hercules") - which
for Maoris was a giant called "Maui".
The interesting part of Maori mythology
was that "Tane" is presented as a son of
"Rangi" and "Papa". But the defining "Tane"
as a son of "Rangi" does NOT run against
of what the totaliztic web page
evolution.htm
states in item #B1. After all, an easiest manner of explaining to ancient
Maoris, that the "software" component of "Holy Trinity"
self-evolved in the "hardware" component of the same
"Holy Trinity", was to tell these Maoris that "Tane" is the son of
"Rangi". In a similar manner, the explanation to old
Maoris of the content of item #C3 from the web page
god_proof.htm -
namely that a significant proportion of the "software"
component of God originates from natural programs
that form the physical world, was most easy by
telling these Maoris that "Tane" is also a son of
"Papa". In the book [1#C6] by Margaret
Orbell, entitled "Maori Myth and Legend"
(Canterbury University Press, 1995,
ISBN 0-908812-45-0), on page 179 is described
how, according to the Maori Mythology, "Tane"
created the first woman. (Selected information
on the subject of creation of this first Maori
woman is also provided in item #D3 of
the totaliztic web page named
newzealand_visit.htm.)
And so, he firstly shaped the body of a woman
from "sand" of Hawaiki (the name "Hawaiki"
refers to the Maori version of "Eden"), and then he
breathed life into her mouth
so that she become alive. This is why she was
called "Hine-ahu-one" meaning
"The-woman-shaped-from-soil". Via this
first woman Tane gave also to people various problems,
like sweat, tears, sneezing, coughing, mucus, etc.
This description has NOT only a perfect correspondence
to the descriptions of the creation of a first human
contained in all religions of the world, but also
corresponds well to what on this subject states
the Concept of Dipolar Gravity in item #D2 of the web page
soul_proof.htm.
After creating the first woman Tane had many
children with her, thus forming the Maori race.
What even more intriguing, the old religion of
Maoris still contained elements which in the
religions of Greeks and Romans were watered
down or forgotten with the elapse of time. For example,
in spite a huge variety of godly personalities-manifestations
known under various names, Maoris acknowledged
the existence of just a single true God, which
they called "Io". This only God of Maoris "Io"
was almost an exact copy of the only God
"Brahman" in Hinduism. Furthermore, the
old religion of Maoris cultivated extremely
precise information about how from "Po" - means
from the initial "Chaos" of the universe, the
"Holy Trinity" evolved. For example, they knew
as many as 12 different phases of the evolution
of "Po" into "Tane". Interestingly, some amongst
these phases generated states which currently
the Concept of Dipolar Gravity describes as
characteristic and necessary for the evolutionary
self-shaping of the software component of God.
For example, from this "Po" emerged, amongst
others: "Te Hinengaro" means "mind, desire",
"Te Manako" means "longing", "Te Tipuranga"
means "growth", "Te Mahara" means "thought,
memory", etc. As so-far I have NOT met any estimates
of the age of Maoris' religion. But because the
same religion was widely distributed amongst
a number of nations from islands of Pacific,
probably it is as old as the religion of ancient
Greeks and Romans. All the above confirms
again that the author of religion of Maoris must be God
Himself, and that in times of passing this religion
to Maoris God had a characteristic for that period
template of the religious knowledge which people
should learn, as well as the unique method of
passing this knowledge.
* * *
The above examples indicate unanimously, that
the author of all religions of the world is always
the same single superior being of the universe.
Only that this single being created subsequent
religions in significant time gaps from each other.
For example, the creation of the oldest religion
of the world, i.e. "Hinduism", took place around
6000 years ago, i.e. almost immediately after
God created the physical world and people - see
explanations from subsection JA1.3 in volume 6 of
monograph [8/2].
Means, "Hinduism" was created around 2000
years before the creation of the religion of ancient
Greeks, around 4000 years before the creation
of "Christianity". (As well as around 6000 years
before inspiring the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
and
totalizm.)
Therefore, during the creation of subsequent
religions, this single superior being (God) had
increasingly more experience and knowledge
as how to pass knowledge to people and how
to convince them. Thus, in subsequent religions
this superior being could repair His previous
errors. For example, the error of "Hinduism"
was to give to people too
detailed information - means too voluminous
"Holy Scriptures" which in addition were written
with too precise language, and thus which no-one
amongst people was able to read in their entirety
nor understand them fully. Therefore, during the creation of
the religion of ancient Greeks (and Romans and Maoris),
God did NOT gave them any "Holy Scripture" at
all - although this also later turned out to be an
error. After all, the lack of written rules caused
that to the religion of Greeks and Romans gradually
continuous changes creped in, and these religions
started to deviate from the original messages of
God. Therefore, during the creation of "Christianity"
God decided to give a very short
"Holy Book" in form of the Bible. This Bible used
rather simple and non-precise everyday language
that was understandable even for ancient shepherds.
But with the elapse of time, this simplicity of the
language of Bible caused mistakes in interpretations,
which God was again forced to correct somehow
(amongst others through inspiring the creation of
scientific
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
and the
philosophy of totalizm
which stems from this theory).
Part #D:
Let us learn attributes of "totaliztic truths":
#D1.
Let us characterise "totaliztic truths":
Logical deductions completed in previous
parts of this web page reveal gradually some
characteristic attributes of "totaliztic truths".
Let us list and summarise here at least the
most vital from these attributes:
1.
Truth for sure exist. Many philosophers argues,
that an objective truth may NOT exist at all. But
"totalizm" states that such truth does exist for sure -
only that it cannot be expressed absolutely sure
and unambiguously (as it is explained in next item 2).
2.
No truth can be defined and expressed absolutely
sure, unambiguously, and undeniably. In other
words, although a given truth for sure exist, for
practical reasons we always are forced to express
it in brief - and thus in a significant simplification.
This in turn means, that when expressing such an
abbreviated truth, we turn it into an approximate
truth.
3.
In the universe created and ruled by God, facts which
appear to confirm a truth in reality may have nothing
to do with this truth. This in turn cause, that people
must be extremely careful in their interpretations of
facts. Especially if these facts and their interpretations
are to decide about someone's fate or even life (e.g.
as this takes the place in courts).
Part #E:
Is truth always winning:
#E1.
So-called "twelve truths about truth"
from chapter N of monograph
[5/3] in PDF format:
In 1996 I published the
monograph [5/3].
It reported about the so-called "Tapanui Crater"
from New Zealand. This crater was formed
because in 1178 AD a UFO vehicle exploded
in there. I discovered and researched this
crater already in 1987. But in spite of a huge
body of evidence for the UFO explosion that
was present in there, the dissemination of the
truth which I discovered then on this area of
UFO explosion was blocked by someone powerful
although invisible. This truth is blocked in there
until today. In the meantime was removed and
destroyed the majority of evidence for the
UFO explosion, which I discovered then
and documented in my publications.
Today I already know that this blocking the
truth and destruction of evidence is carried
out by "simulations" of
UFOnauts
which I described in item #G1 from the further
part of this web page. It is them that spread
lies over the Earth, amongst others through
im personating important people. But in times
of discovery and investigations of the Tapanui
Crater I still believed, that this truth is blocked
and persecuted by local immoral people.
This triggered my efforts of finding out why
it is so. One amongst products of my efforts
was the sequence of rather philosophical
considerations concerning truths. This sequence
was published in chapter N from monograph
[5/3] available in PDF format. I entitled it the
"twelve truths about truth". I am going to
present it here as a kind of curiosity. So here
is the final sequence of "twelve truths about
truth", which reveal the mechanism that causes
that "truth always finally wins" (it originally was
published in monograph [5/3]).
This final sequence of “twelve truths about truth” which cause that “truth always finally prevails” is as follows:
1. “Truth never is obvious”. An interesting law or regularity of the universe, the existence of which the author discovered only after many years of wondering and unpleasant experiences, is that the nucleus of a truth always seems to be well hidden, masked with trivia, and guarded by a pack of common beliefs. For this reason the finding of a given truth usually takes place at the very end, while earlier many less inquisitive minds are fooled by circumstances and land in dead ends, misleading also many other people with their erroneous claims. This discovery stands in opposition to a popular belief which is reinforced by textbooks, and which seems to suggest that ”truth always is obvious and it hits eyes just on its own”. But this discovery is agreeable with already revealed principles of God’s action described in volume 6 of monograph [8e/2]. Here is an example of the proverb which emphasizes that the truth is well hidden: "truth lies at the bottom of a well" (it is ascribed to Heraclit from Efez). The fact of careful hiding of truth brings several important consequences to the human behaviour. The most vital of these is to become aware that: (1) finding a given truth never is easy and always costs us a lot of effort (or opposite: ”everything that can be determined fast and easily, is NOT a truth for sure and it certainly one day is going to show that it was hiding some misleading element), (2) only people with great minds and unique attributes of character (e.g. patience, persistence, thoroughness, inquisitiveness) are able to determine earlier unknown truths (or: the ability to determine earlier unknown truths is the measure of the greatness of human minds), (3) a given truth always is learned at the very end, when all versions of untruth which other people were inclined to listen to are already running out (or: people usually accept the radical truth only if they absolutely have no other choice), (4) a given truth frequently is an exact opposite to what is commonly believed (or: people who wish to learn the truth must distant themselves from commonly accepted stereotypes).
2. “Truth always is inconvenient”. Whatever a given truth would state, there always be people for whom it is going to be inconvenient for one or other reason, thus who are going to fight this truth out. This is perfectly expressed by the proverbs "the greater the truth, the greater the libel", “the truth hurts”, or “words that are true are seldom beautiful, while words that are beautiful are seldom true” (Japanese). For example, the discovery that the Tapanui Crater originates from a UFO explosion, immediately becomes inconvenient to all people and institutions who do NOT want to disclose, that the Earth currently is under a secretive occupation of a cosmic civilisation which is more advanced than our own (in the understanding of this “occupation” explained in chapter B), or who are afraid that the society may realise that the knowledge of our scientists is completely insufficient for truthful explanation of the majority of phenomena which surround us. The inconvenience of a given truth have a number of consequences, for example it causes that: (1) ”saying truth and only truth is always coming with a great effort”, (2) ”only a few sparse people consequently insist on speaking the truth”, or (3) ”in the private life we most appreciate others for their consequence in standing by truth” (but we should NOT confuse the appreciation in the private life from rewarding in the public life in which still “rewarded are these people who say things that we wish to hear” although simultaneously such people are NOT appreciated at all). The fact that "truth is always inconvenient" represents a version of more general law of the universe which states that "building is always more difficult than destroying”. As it is the case with buildings, which when are bigger they encounter more difficulties during their construction, similarly it is with truth - the more people a given truth affects, the greater resistance it must cause. In turn the more people are affected by a given truth, the more vital this truth is - see also item #5 below.
3. “There is always one truth only, whereas various shades of untruths have no end”. This truth is expressed in the best way by the English proverb "craft must have clothes, but truth loves to go naked". For example, when relating to the subject of this monograph, it means that there is only one true reason for the eventuation of the Tapanui Crater, but there are no limits for multiplying various “convenient explanations” for the possible origins of this crater. In turn by existing in only one version, by nature truth is unreceptive to manipulations, while untruth can be shaped in any form that one may wish to have. So the above must lead to the situations that always such a formulation of untruth can be found which satisfies almost everyone, while the single meaning of a truth makes that it never pleases everyone. This in turn leads to the regularity number #2 listed before.
4. “For accepting a given truth people must mature” (means a truth cannot be given to someone as a gift, nor can be forced onto someone). This is perfectly expressed by the proverb “you can bring a horse to the water, but you cannot make it drink”. It turns out that the acceptance of a new and radical truth is a complex process of the more emotional (involving feelings) than intellectual (involving rationality and logic) character. In this accepting of a truth the most vital is the philosophical maturity of a given person. It could be illustratively compared to the climbing of a ladder - in order to climb a specific spoke it is previously necessary to already stand on a nearby spoke. Unfortunately, our present educational system seems to NOT encourage the high philosophical maturity (see chapter JB from monograph [1/4]). From the author’s experience to-date it appears that the higher formal education someone acquired, the statistically less probability is that this someone has the ability to accept a radical truth. So in case of the lack of such maturity, no matter how logically and undeniably are presented arguments and proofs, still a given truth is going to be rejected anyway. Expressing this in a simplified manner, people who are immature philosophically do NOT change their views. From the experience of the author it appears that it is not worth to even waste the time for trying to convince to a given truth such people who are NOT mature enough to accept it. Much better use of this time is to reassure the certainty and conviction in these people who are already prepared to accept a given truth. Because the elapse of time and the accumulation of the life experience are the only factors which may cause the reaching a philosophical maturity, some more radical truths may need to await entire centuries before people get mature enough to accept them.
5. “The resistance against accepting a given truth is proportional to the significance of it”, or in other words “the more vital is a given truth, the greater resistance it meets during the dissemination of it”. So it is NOT true the popular belief that it is enough to reveal or prove the truth, in order everyone accepted it without any reservations. In fact only untruth is accepted without a resistance, because usually it is so formulated that it satisfies the majority of people. In turn the dissemination of new truths requires fighting many heavy battles, soldiers in which are all these who actively fight for a given truth. Practically it is even possible to estimate the extend of the influence at the society that a given truth is going to bring, through an ordinary analysis of the resistance that exists against the dissemination of this truth. For example, the huge resistance which presently is met by the truth about a secretive occupation of the Earth by evil UFOnauts (in the understanding of this occupation from chapter B), indicates that the final acceptance of this truth is going to exert an immense influence on our civilisation. The existence of the resistance against dissemination of a given truth means that this dissemination cannot be carried out as a “peaceful” process, but must depend on breaking through the resistance of other people, institutions, or countries, for which given truth seems to be detrimental. Thus people who spread a truth, means these ones who participate in the breaking through the resistance of opponents, in case when the truth wins are lavishly rewarded, because:
6. “Truth always bears fruits for those people who fight for it”. Although at a first glance it may appear that only insisting on untruth brings appropriate fruits, actually every truth gives more fruit than the equivalent untruth. Unfortunately, these fruits of the truth usually come after a long time since the truth was sawn. Furthermore, fruits of truth usually do NOT limit themselves to only the subject of a given truth, but are also born in areas apparently unconnected to this truth. For example, a significant number of these fruits concern accomplishing the state of inner happiness and satisfaction, philosophical growth, self-realization, sense of life, moral strength, etc., in people fighting for a given truth. Thus, these fruits become unnoticeable to others and are appreciated only by adherers of a given truth, while benefiting from them is possible only in the case when someone actively fights for the dissemination of a given truth. In order to provide here an example of fruits of truth that relate to the subject area of this monograph, from chapter G it is obvious that the institution or the country which acknowledges the truth about UFOs soon afterwards becomes able to build the Magnocraft which is going to give to it an unprecedented advantage over other institutions or countries in the military, technological, and economical areas. But the potential benefits which are to stem from the construction of the Magnocraft can be appreciated only by these ones who are going to accept the existence of UFOs and the fact of secretive occupation of the Earth by UFOs - described in chapter B. Thus the outcome of the victory of truth regarding UFOs will be that a given person, social group, or a country, is going to exceed and subdue (militarily, economically, or intellectually) all these whom for some reasons, e.g. because of the prosperity that existed in them, would NOT accept this truth. Fruits which a given truth is able to bear, give to it a huge power and cause that the number of devotees of it continually grows with the elapse of time. Due to this increase in numbers of adherers, truth always seems to persist independently of the sacrifices amongst its adherers, i.e.:
7. “Truth never dies”, although frequently perish people who fight for it. Expressing this in other words, “the correct idea lives even if the first adherers of it already died out”. In this way the fight for truth, when once is initiated, is going to last until the victory - no matter when this victory is to come. Of course, the truth does not win this fight for as long, until on the side of it stands the sufficient number of adherers. Unfortunately, in countries of a high wealth there is a basic difficulties with acquiring such new adherers, because:
8. “The more someone has to loose, the bigger his or her reluctance to stand up in the defence of truth”. The same can be expressed with different words, namely that “people who have a lot to loose rarely insist on the truth” (this is especially visible in politics). So this contradicts to popular opinion that “people of authority tell and promote the truth” (actually ”people of authority have much more to loose than other people, thus in their interest lies more to promote easily accepted untruth that to promote unpopular truths”). The above is a logical consequence of the regularity number #2 which stated that “truth is always inconvenient”. So being aware of inconvenience of a “naked truth” people who are in positions of authority and thus who do NOT want to be exposed to attacks of other people are going to rather stand on the other side than truth. This is because in the present moral and social climate “in the public life people reward others NOT for telling the truth, but for telling what they would like to hear”. Because in the society that accomplished a higher level of wealth there is statistically more people who have something to loose by standing on the side of naked truth, the above means that “the higher prosperity of a given society, the less in it people inclined to stand on the side of truth”. This in turn leads to the paradox situation that:
9. “The radical truths have a chance to prevail (i.e. to become commonly known) only due to people, social groups, or countries with a low social position or low state of prosperity”. (This perhaps lies at the basis of the significance which almost every religion places on poverty and on poor people. Probably this is also the reason for which in present times the truth about UFOs is promoted almost exclusively by people other than well-paid and highly thinking of themselves scientists.) As this is already indicated in item #6, the learning a truth is linked to a learning various additional unknowns that provide a given person, a social group, or a country, with an significant advantage over all others. Furthermore, various non-material consequences of insisting on truth give to the adherers of it an additional moral advantage. So through promoting a given truth, countries, groups, or people of a lower prosperity or a lower position gradually exceed materially and spiritually these other countries, groups or people of the higher prosperity. This in turn leads to the situation from item #11. However, in order to NOT be forced to act against truth, in many cases:
10. “People especially mature philosophically sometimes even resign from their professional careers to NOT stand in opposition to truth”. This is especially noticeable in highly talented people who on the early stage of their lives accomplished high positions. Many out of them, in spite that a further career still stands open for them, sometimes rapidly resign from it in order to lead a quiet, although more happy, fulfilled, and deprived of stresses life, in order to devote completely to their personal interests, family, etc. After a closer investigation of reasons for which they withdrawn from their previous careers, almost as a rule it turns out that in their opinion in present times the accomplishing of high positions collides with the standing by truth. Therefore, according to their own moral standards, it is better to cease climbing up to the top, than to deprive ourselves the inner growth and happiness. In the life-philosophies of many cultures, e.g. in the Chinese culture, the continuous seeking of truth and the promotion of truth, is one amongst three most fundamental requirements, the fulfilment of which allows to accomplish the state of inner happiness and satisfaction (other such requirements are: the correct spiritual attitude, and the harmonious coexistence with other people). This ability to resign from career in the name of truth can also be expressed with the words, that ”people internally great do NOT need to climb up in the hierarchy in order to prove their greatness” (the above works also in the opposite direction, namely “some are climbing up the hierarchy in order to hide their smallness”). Unfortunately, not many people discover this regularity, thus happiness and the fulfilled life usually are linked to the climbing to the top of prosperity, although:
11. “Through tendency to ignore truth the prosperity contains the seeds of decay”. People, families, groups, organisations (e.g. political parties), institutions, or countries, which because of the prosperity that they accomplished, or because of the arriving to the top, cease to place emphasis onto the promotion of truths, after some time are overtaken in one or the other way, and consequently also subdued, suppressed, or outlived, by these ones who stand by truth and thus who also learn the knowledge linked to this truth. This is well expressed by the saying "what went up, must come down". In some cultures the truth that “prosperity contains the seeds of decay” is commonly known and considered even in education. For example, in the traditional English culture, children of rich parents were purposely given to so-called "boarding schools", although their parents could afford the employment of private teachers to educate their offspring at home. In these “boarding schools” the iron discipline and intentional maintenance of primitive and almost poor living conditions taught these children to learn and to promote the truth. In culture of many nations a conviction exists, that the prosperity of a single family - if it is NOT reinforced purposely through the undertaking of some intentionally introduced extraordinary means (such as e.g. educating children in these special "boarding schools"), can usually be maintained not longer than by three generations. The third of these generations so much parts from the sense of truth that is rooted in the poverty, that it fast looses the entire family fortune. This conviction is expressed in numerous proverbs, e.g. in the English "the father buys, the son builds, the grandson sells, and his son begs", in the Chinese "Ji saj czoł" which means “riches remain only for three generations", or in the Japanese "if a man makes money his son will spend it and his grandson will be poor again" - for more examples of such proverbs and for their sources see monograph [9]. The same idea appears also in the Polish culture in the known saying regarding the ”wasteful son”.
It is worth to add, that in the Polish culture the origin from a poor family is erroneously considered to be something that we should be ashamed of, or that we should at least be embarrassed about. But in many other cultures, e.g. in the traditional Chinese culture (e.g. amongst Chinese living in Malaysia), it is completely opposite - people are proud if they originate from a poor family and at every occasion they emphasize it, while they seem to be embarrassed and hide their status when they originate from a rich family. There are various desirable attributes of the character, life experiences, emotions, personal values, philosophical views, and spiritual attributes, which acquiring becomes possible only if someone originates from a poor family and only if the life did NOT spare difficulties and obstacles to this person. People born in rich families are almost as a rule deprived of these attributes. (This is why God brings up humans with the assistance of pain and disasters - i.e. with the method described in chapter B.) One amongst these desirable attributes of the character is to stand by truth. So it is about time that also in our culture the fact of originating from a poor family becomes a reason for a pride, and also that we begin to judge others not by the family from which they originate, but by the progress that they accomplished in relationship to the starting point from which they initiated their lives.
The above emphasizes the importance of the country of someone’s birth. The birth and bringing up in a country (such as Poland) which is sufficiently poor to provide its youths with appropriate experiences and views that are available only in conditions of national poverty, but simultaneously which is sufficiently advanced technologically, educationally, and culturally, to secure for these youths the modern and universal foundations in education, philosophy and morality, is a huge blessing which the beneficiaries begin to appreciate only after they go overseas and after they are confronted with the views, values, and standards of people born and brought up in rich countries.
The fall-down of people, families, institutions, and nations which because of the growth of their prosperity distanced themselves from the truth, means in turn that:
12. “The truth always finally prevails trough the simple living longer than these people who were against it”. Although the promotion of untruth is linked to various instant (short-term) benefits, on the long term fruits of truth turn out to be more beneficial and provide their promoters with the significant advantage over the adherers of untruth. So in the final effect the adherers of untruth either fall-down and become dependent on the adherers of truth, or simply die out and are replaced by the growing number of adherers of the truth. After a specific time the only ones who remain alive and active are adherers of the truth. Thus, this finding reveals quite a surprising final effect of the mechanism which stands behind a popular saying that “truth always prevails”. It turns out that truth prevails because of the “longevity”. The victory of truth, although inevitable, does NOT come easy, fast, and painless. It is a long process which requires many sacrifices on both sides, while in the final effect it is dependent on the dying out, subduing, or destruction of people, institutions, or countries from which recruited opponents of a given truth.
It is worth to emphasize, that independently from the author of this monograph, to exactly the same conclusion about the ”extinction of old ideas together with their bearers” arrived also other researchers. For example see the book [1N] by Thomas Kuhn, "The structure of scientific revolutions", University of Chicago press, 1970. The main thesis of that book also states, that new ideas do NOT overcome the old ones through a direct speaking to logic and to knowledge of subsequent people and thus through convincing these people about their validity, but rather a growing number of young people enters the world and brings the acceptance for these new ideas, while the adherers of old views simply must die out.
Part #F:
Most vital truths that are just are going through their thorny pathways:
This part of the web page describes truths
which just now are going through their "thorny
pathways", and thus about which this web
page offers scientific literature and links
to other web pages which present them.
#F1.
The most strongly silenced truths
:
Motto:
"Evil always personifies good. Devil always pretends to be an engel.
Antichrist
probably is to assume the face of Jesus or Buddha."
Let us describe basic truths that right now
are going through their "Thorny Ways" and
for which this web site is offering publications
that provide their scientific explanations.
There is a lot of basic truths, which present orthodox science
was unable to explain, thus which are hidden from the public sight.
The knowledge about these truth is hard to come by. Therefore, this
web site offers scientific publications that explain these truths
is small details. Here is a list of the most important of them:
1. The formal proof for the existence of God.
Not many people knows, that the existence of God is not contradictive to
the modern scientific theories. Rather otherwise, there is a formal proof
already developed and published, which uses a very reliable scientific methodology
to prove the actual existence of God. This proof is proving the existence of God
in an equally reliable manner, as for example physicists prove that gravity forces
are obeying the famous Newton equation (F=ma). The formal proof for the existence
of God is based on a new scientific theory called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
Thus, since this proof is developed and available, now the God's existence
is not a matter of believes or speculations, but a matter of reliable scientific
knowledge! (Notice that the Concept of Dipolar Gravity (CDG) by itself is also
extremely interesting and worth reading: it turns out to be that Theory of
everything searched by people for so long. For example it also explains what is,
and where is located that "second world" to which we are shifting after our death
and what is the nature of this world, how our soul and spirit work and look like,
what we feel at the moment of death and during this shifting to another world,
etc. Exact descriptions of CDG are provided in volumes 4 and 5 of the monograph [1/4]
and in volumes 6 and 7 of monograph [8] "Totalizm".
2. The existence and operation of moral laws.
Presently people tend to think, that the only laws of the universe
that affect everyone, are laws of nature that have a physical character.
In turn all other laws that people know, e.g. social, legal, ethical,
etc., are only executed from people when there is a policeman around
who makes sure that everyone obeys them. But the most recent research
into the Concept of Dipolar Gravity reveals, that independently from
laws of physics, in our universe do exist and operate so-called "moral
laws". These moral laws cause, that everything that is moral must climb
uphill in the invisible moral field ("moral field" is very similar to
"gravity field"). Thus every moral work requires from us a significant
effort and costs us overcoming various difficulties. But these moral
laws have rewards and punishments build into them. Therefore, if we
obey moral laws and in our activities we climb uphill in the moral field,
then we are always lavishly rewarded for this. In turn, when we act
immorally, then we are severely punished for this. For more details see
chapters JA, JB, and I of monograph [1/4], and also A, B, and K of
monograph [8] "Totalizm".
3. Totalizm as the medicine of morality.
Only with great difficulties people are getting the message, that there is
developed and presently is disseminated throughout the world, a new philosophy
called
totalizm.
The content of this philosophy is described in chapters JA to JF of monograph
[1/4], and also in chapters A to M of monograph [8]. This new philosophy
explains principles on which we must base our lives, when we know for sure,
that in the universe God does exist and moral laws do operate, so that
whatever we do, is then justly judged by them. If we obey these moral
laws in our lives, we are rewarded by them. But if we break them, we are
punished by them. Totalizm is really an extraordinary philosophy. It is
the same strict and logical as present physics and mathematics. Because
it teaches the way in which whatever affects us in our lives, depends on
our morality, actually it fulfils the function of "moral medicine". Even
the history of totalizm is extraordinary. All publications on totalizm were
written in the most East located large Islamic country in the world
(i.e. in Malaysia), but they were published in the most East located
large Christian country in the world (i.e. in New Zealand). From over
there publications on totalizm were travelling with the speed of light
to the most west located large country of the world (i.e. to the USA),
from where they were distributed via the Internet throughout the
entire world. Thus one may say, that totalizm is like a lightning that
flashed across the sky from a far East to a far West.
4. Formal proof for the existence of UFO.
No many people know that the existence of UFOs is already proven in a formal
manner. The scientific proof for the existence of UFOs is presented in
subsection P2 of monograph [1/4] and in subsection j2 of monograph [1e]
(both these monographs are available free of charge from this internet site).
5. Hiding of UFOs from people.
A next truth which is rather suppressed, is that our confusion and the
lack of knowledge on UFOs do not result at all from the non-existence of
UFOs, but are actually caused by the fact that UFOs on purpose are hiding
from people. These technically highly advances space vehicles, that we
know under the name of UFOs, in reality are utilising various capabilities
that are created by their advanced technology, in order to purposely,
like robbers and thieves, hide from people. They carry out this hiding
on several different principles. Two most popular out of them include:
(1) creating the so-called "magnetic lens" around their vehicles, due to
which their vehicles disappear from the view, and (2) putting themselves
into a state of the so-called "telekinetic flickering". In this state they
flicker with the frequency of around 2500 Hz, means many times faster than
frames of motion movies in our cinemas, or spinning propellers of present
aeroplanes. Thus human eyes are unable to notice them, even when they stand
directly in front of us.
6. Parasitic activities of UFOs on Earth.
Everyone knows that if someone is hiding from us, this someone has something
very immoral for hiding. As it turns out, the reason for which UFOnauts
continually hide from people, is that they parasite on humans. This parasiting
depends on robbing people from various biological resources. This includes robbing
people from sperm and ovule that are used for raising the so-called
biorobots - which UFOnauts exploit then mercilessly on their planets,
from life energy, and from many more resources. For details see subsection A3 in
volume 1 of monograph [1/4], or subsection E1 in volume 4 of monograph [8].
Unfortunately, their evil deeds UFOnauts do not limit to just hiding from us.
But in order to maintain their scientific and technical advantage over people
they also suppress and try to extinguish all new ideas on Earth, making
very difficult the completion of such new ideas, manipulating minds of
all intellectually weaker scientists and managers - so that they attack
and oppress everything that is progressive, inducing various hysteria on
Earth against everything that may disclose their constant presence and their
parasitic activities on Earth (e.g. against UFO research), and do to humanity
unimaginable number of losses and harm. There is a valid reason why in old
times UFOnauts were called devils, while the parasitic society from
which UFOnauts originate was called a "hell". It is about a time we start to
defend ourselves from these UFOnauts and start to get rid of these cosmic
bloodsuckers from our backs.
7. Murdering of people by UFOs.
In our blindness about the existence of UFOs we overlook one more bitter truth
- namely that UFOnauts murder mercilessly millions of people on Earth. The reasons
for this murdering are explained in subsections A3 and A4 from volume 1 of
monograph [1/4], and in subsections E1 and E10 from volume 4 of monograph [8]
(both these monographs are downloadable free of charge from this web site - see
Menu on the left margin). Such murdering is carried out both, on individual people,
as well as on entire communities. In case of individual people, usually they are
killed by UFOnauts through being infected with deadly diseases. For example in
subsection N5.2 of monograph [1/4] is described a machine that UFOnauts use to
infect people with cancer. In turn on whole communities that murder through causing
various cataclysms, wars, sabotages, terrorism acts, etc. For example in subsection
A4 of monograph [1/4] I am describing the history of heat wave that killed thousands
of people in Chicago not long ago, while in subsection E8 of monograph [8] is described
how UFOnauts evaporated two buildings of WTC in New York, killing around 2000 people.
The list of UFO murders on humanity does not finish on these two cases. Much more such
cases is described in monographs [1/4] and [8].
8. The reversal of friction.
A next truth that our orthodox scientists seem not able to comprehend,
is that there is a phenomenon that is a reversal of friction. It is
called the Telekinetic Effect, because it induces telekinetic motion.
Similarly as friction spontaneously converts motion into heat, this
Telekinetic Effect spontaneously converts heat into motion. If we
master the industrial use of this new phenomenon, then it allows us
to build so-called "free energy devices" (in old days called "perpetual
motion"). As it turns out, the operation of these devices does not collide
with 3rd Law of Thermodynamic at all. This is because they extract heat
from their environment in order to produce motion. More details about
these unique technical devices of our future can be found in chapter
H (volume 4) of monograph [1/4], or in chapter L (volume 7) of monograph
[8]. Also description of some of them is contained in treatise [7/2].
9. Telepathy, nirvana, magic, miracles, contactees, and the
so-called "unexplained phenomena". The
The shocking and amazing is the reluctance with which orthodox scientists
on Earth are ignoring, rejecting, and denying of the entire group of the
so-called "unexplained phenomena", which include telepathy, nirvana, magic,
miracles, contactees, etc. Only the manipulation of their minds by UFOs,
that I described above, provides a justification for such behaviour of the
large population of scientists. But if one takes a close look at these
"unexplained phenomena", it turns out that they have a simple and clear
explanations. These explanations are provided in chapters H and I from
volumes 4 and 5 of monograph [1/4], and also in chapters K and L from
volumes 6 and 7 of monograph [8]. There is also a number of web sites
accessible from the menu on the left margin of this page, which provide
simple explanations to these phenomena.
Part #G:
Findings which support with facts truths from "part #F"
about the "simulation" of the occupation of Earth by
morally decadent
UFOnauts:
#G1.
What is this "simulation":
The explanation as to what exactly is this
"simulation" of the secretive occupation of
the Earth, is provided on a whole range of
totaliztic web pages, e.g.
in item #L2 of the web page
magnocraft.htm,
in item #K4 of the web page
fe_cell.htm,
or in items #B11 to #B13 of the totaliztic web page
god.htm.
Therefore, it is NOT going to be repeated here.
For the better understanding of the "mission" of
this web page, it is enough to know, that in spite
that this secretive occupation of the Earth by
evil UFOnauts is "simulated", us people have the
duty to treat it and to defend from it, as if it was
a real one.
#G2.
The resolution by the internet list totalizm@hydepark.pl, on
"exploitation of Earth by UFOnauts":
A historic resolution was accepted on 24 March 2003.
Because it directly relates to the suppression of
truth regarding parasitic UFOs and UFOnauts,
I am going to present it here.
The painful and prolonged fate of this resolution is
described more comprehensively in subsection A4 of
monograph [1/4]. The voting on this resolution was
carried out in very dramatic circumstances, under a
significant external pressures, and with intensive
sabotage of UFOnauts. During this voting UFOnauts
demonstrated to the participants of the internet
list the power of their occupational forces, and
their control over the development of situation.
However, although this resolution turned out to
be a painful and expensive victory of totalizm,
still it is a victory, and this is what matters
the most. Here is the content of this resolution.
The exploitation of Earth by UFOnauts: the
collective resolution of the internet list totalizm@hydepark.pl
regarding official recognition of formal proof on
the existence of UFO, recognition of the formal
proof on the occupation of Earth by UFOs, and
recognition of the Magnocraft as a technical
explanation for UFOs
We, 161 participants of the
internet list totalizm@hydepark.pl, representing
almost every area of life and almost every region
of Poland, with a great concern observe the
development of present situation regarding
parasitic activities of UFOs on Earth. From
one side we see the passivity of authorities
and adverse of scientists towards increasingly
larger problems that are induced by parasitic
activities of UFOs on Earth, and we also see
the growing tendency to ignore the prevailing
collective opinions of majority of people and
to base UFO-related decisions on claims just
a few non-constructive individuals. On the
other hand we notice the overwhelming accumulation
of evidence on the continuous presence of UFOs
on Earth, evidence of immoral interference of
UFOnauts in our public life, and evidence of
abductions of people to UFOs combined with
biological exploitation of people in UFOs.
We are also aware, that in 1981, in the Polish
Journal Przeglad Techniczny Innowacje (no 13/1981,
pages 21-23) for the first time a formal
scientific proof was published, which stated
that "UFOs are Magnocraft". Starting from that
moment, a growing number of scientific monographs
is widely available for all interested, which
formally prove the physical nature of UFOs,
the parasitic interests of UFOnauts in Earth,
the magnetic character of UFO propulsion systems,
etc. Until present day these formal proofs transformed
the knowledge on UFOs that is available so-far
into a single consistent logical structure,
proving via this structure that (1) UFOs do
exist and they are material space vehicles
piloted by morally degenerated relatives of
people that originate from space, (2) that
morally decadent owners of UFO vehicles
occupy and exploit humanity in a hidden
manner, and (3) that the design and
operation of the space vehicle with
magnetic propulsion called the "Magnocraft"
provides a complete and correct explanation
for all technical aspects of UFOs. We are
also aware, that very detailed descriptions
of the Magnocraft, as well as all scientific
proofs that originate from Magnocraft,
are available in a number of scientific
publications. Amongst these publications
the most up-to-date is the scientific
monograph [1/4] by Prof. Dr Jan Pajak,
entitled "Advanced magnetic devices"
(4th edition, Wellington, New Zealand,
2003, ISBN 0-9583727-5-6). This monograph
is distributed free of charge from numerous
web sites named
text_1_4.htm,
and from other sites linked from these ones.
While being aware of all
the above, and simultaneously knowing
about responsibility that lies on our
shoulders because of our representation
of the cross-section of the entire society
and all regions of our country, herewith
we resolve the following. #1. We resolve that we officially recognise
the formal proof that states that "UFO vehicles
do exist". We know that this proof, carried
out according to the scientific methodology
of "matching attributes", is published and
distributed constantly starting since 1981,
and that no-one managed to undermine the
merit of it. By recognising the significance
and validity of this scientific proof, we
simultaneously declare and remind, that it
has the binding power and that its conclusions,
and awareness consequences, should be considered
in action of every person on Earth. Especially
binding this formal proof is for scientists
and for UFO investigators, who on the basis
of it have the obligation to undertake the
constructive research of goals and manifestations
of UFO activities on Earth. #2. We resolve also, that we officially recognise
merit of the formal scientific proof stating that
"UFOs are Magnocraft, which are constructed by
technically highly advanced, although morally
decadent, civilisations of evil parasites from
space". We oblige everyone to respect the
conclusions and significant consequences
of this proof. #3. Furthermore we resolve, that we officially
recognise the formal scientific proof, that
"morally decadent owners of UFO vehicles occupy
our planet in a hidden manner, and secretly
carry out a large scale exploitation of humanity".
We oblige every citizen of our planet to encompass
the seriousness of consequences of this scientific
proof, and to initiate actions that gradually
neutralise this occupation and exploitation
of people by UFOnauts.
While resolving all the above, we simultaneously
strongly encourage all interested, to urgently
learn about scientific proofs contained in
the monograph [1/4] indicated above, the
official and popular recognition of which
this resolution declares and also the multitude
of consequences of which we are trying to realise
with the assistance of this resolution. We also
encourage to learn the design, operation, and
propulsion system of the Magnocraft, which is
the space vehicle that represents an Earth's
version of UFOs (means which displays all
attributes of UFOs, carries the same operational
capabilities as UFOs, and induces the same
phenomena which are known from UFO observations).
While issuing this resolution, and granting
to it the character of a true representation
of our collective views and wishes, we
simultaneously hope, that the resolution
finally is going to initiate constructive
actions and initiatives regarding UFOs,
so long-awaited by the society. For example
we hope, that it is going to inspire the
undertaking of systematic research on UFOs
by scientists and by people responsible
for our security and our level of informing.
We hope, that in all matters regarding
UFOs the society starts to draw from
collective wisdom and stops following
the claims of wrong but noisy individuals,
who probably are manipulated by these
parasitic UFOs. We hope, that this
resolution breaks through the impasse
to-date which surrounded the progress
of people's rational understanding
of the reasons, multitude, and
technology of morally degenerated
aggressors from UFOs. We hope,
that it is to make people sensitive
about immoral, parasitic, and hidden
character of all activities of
UFOs on Earth. We hope that it
points the attention of authorities
at burning issues of the defence
of society from evil exploitation
by UFOs. We hope, that it makes
everyone interested in the scar
from identification implant of UFOs,
which (the scar) the majority of
us is having on a leg. We hope,
that it is going to initiate more
intensive observations of UFO activity
in our living space, and that it
realises that with appropriate methods
and devices which are sensitive at
fast telekinetic motion, literally
tens of visually invisible, telekinetic
UFO vehicles can be registered in our
sky in every moment of time (these
telekinetic UFO vehicles are usually
referred to, as "rods"). We hope also,
that this resolution inspires all people
to undertake an active self-defence
against cosmic aggressors from UFOs.
This resolution was taken on 24 March 2003,
in the result of anonymous voting (which
was based on pseudo-names) that was open
for participants of debates on the internet
list totalizm@hydepark.pl. The results of
this voting was unanimous - the entire
100% of voting participants gave their
votes for accepting this resolution.
The participants confirm that the voting
had anonymous character, thus the results
represent an exact reflection of actual
views and wishes of people that voted.
In turn because voters represented
the cross-section through the entire
society and through all regions of Poland,
and also because the text of what was
resolved represents the collective
opinion of voters, this resolution is
representative for the stand, wishes,
and feelings of significant proportion
of citizens of Poland aware of the
seriousness of current situation.
#G2.
Notice activities of UFOnauts (formerly called "devils"):
Do you know, that when UFOnauts do exist, as this is formally proven
in chapter P of monograph [1/4] and chapter O of monograph [1e], and
when these UFOnauts are evil as the research proves, they are not
going to allow to freely disseminate truths described on this web site.
Therefore they are going to do all possible sabotages, in order
to make dissemination of these truths impossible. Thus internet sites
listed on the left margin will be plagued by all sorts of problems
which may look as "coincidences" but which actually are unnoticeable
sabotages of these evil creatures.
#G3.
Truth is worth fighting for:
Laws of our universe are so designed, that ”everything that is moral is also
difficult to accomplish and requires putting an effort into this”.
This is because of such wise designing of the laws of universe, leading of moral lives is
equivalent to improving ourselves. This also concerns the learning truth. After all,
truth is the essence of morality. There is a moral law (what are moral laws it is
described in subsection I4.1.1 of monograph [1/4] and in subsection K4.1.1 of
monograph [8]) which states that every person carries a personal responsibility
for increasing of his/her knowledge. Thus in spite that always there will be some
obstacles, and always there will be some evil parasites from UFOs, who are going
to make difficult for us to learn truth, we must get ourselves to overcome these
obstacles and these evil parasites, and to learn truth which is on time
and which concerns us. This learning truth is our moral duty. Our learning
of truths we can start from the truths contained in monograph [8]
Totalizm, or from monograph [1/4],
which is offered (for free) through this web site to every person interested.
Fig. #2: Here is an extremely old church painting
which discloses UFOnauts who supervise the
crucifixion of Jesus. Not many amongst us is
is aware that UFOnauts persecute all creative
people and all progressive ideas on Earth.
Thus by the definition UFOnauts persecuted
also Jesus and his breakthrough ideas. Only
that in Bible they are described under the name
of "Satan" - as this is the name by which UFOnauts
were known in times of Jesus. These were
UFOnauts that caused the crucifixion of Jesus
with their methods of telepathic induction of
hysteria of crowds and post-hypnotic suggestions.
Also UFOnauts tried later to squash ideas
disseminated by Jesus. But in case of these
ideas they suffered a defeat. The obstacles
that UFOnauts build up were broken through,
while Christianity, in spite of their vicious attacks,
managed to spread over the Earth.
(The original caption for the above illustration is
provided under Figure O7 for monograph [1/4],
and also under Figure E1 for monograph [8].)
The majority of people usually are unaware, that evil
UFOnauts supervised the crucifixion of Jesus.
Two UFO vehicles, which inside carry clearly visible
faces of UFOnauts watching the crucifixion, are shown
in the above old religious painting from the Orthodox
Basilica in Georgia. Both UFO vehicles can be seen
as they hover in the air slightly below hands of Jesus
on the cross. In turn on enlargements of both these
UFO vehicles, which are reproduced below the entire painting,
in each vehicle a large, long face of a UFOnaut
can be seen, as he looks outside of the vehicle
through the transparent floor. (In order to notice
these faces, one needs to look at the enlargements
of both UFO vehicles from the side directions -
means either after rotating the picture, or our head,
by the angle 90 degrees in relation to how normally
we look at this picture.) It is extremely interesting,
that facial features of the UFOnaut who watches
the crucifixion through the floor of the UFO vehicle
from the right side of the picture (i.e. the UFO which
is visible on the left side of a person looking at this
picture), look shockingly similar to facial features of
Osama Bin Laden. Is it possible that both of them
originate from the same civilisation - see also item
#12 from web page about
Antichrist.
Actually in a symbolic manner, UFO vehicles are
also shown as a standard feature on practically
every picture with the crucifixion of Jesus present
in Greek Orthodox churches. Usually they can be
seen there as a kind of zigzag, or a curved latter
"M", which is pinned to the cross near both hands
(nails) of Jesus. Reasons why
evil
UFOnauts were so hostile towards Jesus, that they make
Him to be crucified by hypnotically and telepathically
angered ancient Israelites, becomes obvious if the
reader reviews the logic of a formal
proof presented on the web page
ufo.htm.
This formal proof states that the morally decadent
cosmic relatives of humans, whom currently we call
UFOnauts, by ancient people used to be called "devils"
or "Satan". So these were UFOnauts who fought
with Jesus and his moral ideas. Only that, as UFOnauts
always do it on Earth, they carefully hid pretending to be
people and
impersonating
most important figures of ancient Israel and Rome.
Means, these were UFOnauts that hypnotically
pre-programmed ancient Israelites to crucify Jesus,
because Jesus initiated spreading on Earth the
totaliztic
philosophy of Christianity, which runs against evil interests
of UFOnauts on Earth.
Let us consider again the story of crucifixion of
Jesus from the simple point of view of physical
and moral outcomes of confrontation between
Jesus and His enemies. This is because the
biblical story bears close similarity to our everyday
lives. As it frequently happens to us all, Jesus
simply tried to put forward various progressive
ideas, while His powerful enemies-UFOnauts
did not want His progressive ideas spread amongst
people. So these enemies-UFOnauts used their
physical brut force in order to silence Jesus and
thus to stop the spread of His ideas. So in a physical
sense Jesus lost this confrontation with His brutal
enemies and was crucified. But He was victorious
in this confrontation on the moral arena. Because
He did everything morally, moral laws rushed to
His aid. These laws caused, that the physical victory
of His enemies was subsequently invalidated by
the action of moral laws themselves. In the result,
the moral victory of Jesus was later transformed
into his physical victory, by the sole action of moral laws.
This extraordinary mechanism, with the use of which
every moral victory is transformed with the elapse
of time into a physical victory, is described more
comprehensively on two separate web pages about
moral laws and about
karma.
(A case of wrestling with UFOnauts on both moral
and physical arena, taken from a real life, is also
discussed on the Polish-only web page containing a
report from the jamboree "Wszewilki-2006.)
This "rectifying" action of moral laws can also
be utilised in our own confrontations from
everyday life. Although we are not dying on a
cross like Jesus did, many of us frequently
confronts very powerful aggressors, which try
to impose their will on us. In many such cases
these ours enemies are
UFOnauts-changelings
themselves, who look exactly like people do
and who pretend to be our superiors and
leaders. If in such cases we utilise the action of
moral laws,
these laws help us to fight the aggressor.
In the result, no matter how powerful the
aggressor is, in the final count we still
always win moral confrontations. The
method that we must follow to accomplish
such wins via moral laws, is described
in my publications under name the of
method of Jesus - e.g. see subsection
W6.2 from volume 18 of
monograph [1/4].
This method is extremely effective. It always
works when I use it. Also historic analyses
that I carried out indicate that this particular
method always worked in history of Earth.
(As a most well-known to everyone example,
consider the aggression of Hitler against
Poland in 1939, or the older case of the
partition of Poland by Germany, Austria,
and Russia.) So let us learn how to use the
method of Jesus
effectively in our everyday lives. After all,
this method has the potential to transform
our situation dramatically.
Part #H:
Summary, and the final information of this web page:
#H1.
Summary of this web page:
For everyone the most easy is to reassure
others that is telling a truth. More difficult is
to actually say the truth. Even more difficult
is to understand what truth really is. Still
more difficult is to notice what is the truth
in the ocean of intentional lies, alterations
of truth, settings up, and all other kinds of
activities aimed at passing untruth to us,
with which we are constantly bombarded.
I hope, that this web page is to assist the
reader in a bit better orientation in this
present "informational jungle" in which
it is increasingly more difficult to see
the truth.
#H2.
Learn more about suppressed truths:
This web site is to allow you to learn more about various truths that are
either suppressed by present orthodox science, are are neglected by people.
Descriptions of such truths are presented in various scientific monographs
available free of charge from this internet site. These monographs describe
even how telepathy work and how to build telepathic devices (i.e. a telepathic
pyramid) which allow to communicate with the use of telepathic waves,
how telekinesis work and how to build telekinetic power stations that produce
so-called "free energy", and many more. The most recent two out of these
monographs are [1/4] "Advanced magnetic devices" and [8] "Totalizm". (Note
that each of these monographs is downloadable free of charge from this web
site). For example subsection L6.3 (from volume 7 of monograph [8]) presents
basic information that I managed to gather about the phenomenon of telepathy itself.
In turn subsections L6.3.1 to L6.3.4, and L6.3, from volume 7 of monograph [8]
present various practical applications for the mechanism of telepathy.
The information that you find in these
subsections are the first hand details,
because I actually researched this extraordinary phenomenon myself. So I am
not just a bitter academician who negatively scoffs at it,
but a person who knows from his own experience that telepathy does exist,
and also knows how it is triggered and how it works. Have a pleasant reading!
#H3.
How with the web page named
"skorowidz_links.htm"
one can find totaliztic descriptions
of topics in which he is interested:
A whole array of topics equally interesting
as these from the above web page, is also
discussed from the angle that is unique to
the philosophy of totalizm. All these related
topics can be found and identified with the use of
content index
prepared especially to make easier finding
these web pages and topics. The name "index"
means a list of "key words" usually provided
at the end of textbooks, which allows to find
fast the description or the topic in which we
are interested. My web pages also has such
a content "index" - only that it is additionally
supplied in green
links
which after "clicking" at them with a mouse
immediately open the web page with the topic
that interest the reader. This content "index"
is provided on the web page named
skorowidz_links.htm.
It can be called from the "organising" part of
"Menu 1" of every totaliztic web page. I would
recommend to look at it and to begin using it
systematically - after all it brings closer hundreds
of totaliztic topics which can be of interest to
everyone.
#H4.
I would suggest to return periodically to this web page in order to check further updates
of the descriptions of hidden methods of suppressing and distorting truths:
In order to see how the updates of this web
page is going to eventuate and progress further,
it is worth to revisit it from time to time. From
the definition this web page is going to be
subjected to further improvements and extensions,
as soon as possible new information come
to my hands, or some events take place
which will inspire me for carrying out the
update. So if in the future you wish to learn
these news, then perhaps you should revisit
this web page. This is because I am going
to update it periodically, as soon as the
further developments give reasons for
reporting any further details.
It is also worth to check periodically the blog of
totalizm available under the address
totalizm.blox.pl/html
(with a mirror copy available under the address
totalizm.wordpress.com).
On this blog many matters addressed here are
also discussed and complemented with additional
details steming from new events unveiling before
our eyes.
Current email addresses to the author of
this web page, i.e. officially to
Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
while courteously to Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak,
at which readers can post possible comments,
opinions, descriptions, or information which in
their opinion I should learn, are provided on the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm
(for its version in the HTML language), or the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.pdf
(for the version of the web page "pajak_jan_uk.pdf"
in safe PDF format - which safe PDF versions
of further web pages by the author can also be
downloaded via links from item #B1 of the web page named
text_11.htm).
The author's right for the use of courteous
title of "Professor" stems from the custom that
"with professors is like with generals", namely
when someone is
once a professor, than he or she courteously
remains a professor forever. In
turn the author of this web page was a professor
at 4 different universities, i.e. at 3 of them,
from 1 September 1992 untill 31 October 1998,
as an "Associate Professor" from English-based
educational system, while on one university as
a (Full) "Professor" (since 1 March 2007 till
31 December 2007 - means at the last place
of employment in his professional life).
However, please notice that because of my
rather chronic lack of time, I reluctantly
reply to emails which contain JUST time
consuming requests, while simultaneously
they document a complete ignorance of their
author in the topic area which I am researching.
This web page is also available in the form
of a brochure marked [11], which
is prepared in "PDF" ("Portable Document
Format") - currently considered to be the
most safe amongst all internet formats, as
normally viruses cannot cling to PDF. This
clear brochure is ready both, for printing,
as well as for reading from a computer
screen. It also has all its
green links
still active. Thus, if it is read from the computer
screen connected to internet, then after clicking
onto these green links, the linked web pages
and illustrations will open. Unfortunately, because
the volume of it is around a double of the volume
of web page which this brochure publishes,
the memory limitations on a significant number
of free servers which I use, do NOT allow to
offer it from them (so if it does NOT download
from this address, because it is NOT available
on this server, then you should click onto any
other address from
Menu 3,
and then check whether in there it is available).
In order to open this brochure (and/or download
it to own computer), it suffices to either click on
the following green link
or to open from any totaliztic web site the
PDF file named as in the above green link.
If the reader wishes to check, whether some other
totaliztic web page which he or she just is studying,
is also available in the form of such PDF brochure,
then should check whether it is listed amongst links
from "part #B" of the web page named
text_11.htm.
This is because links from there indicate all totaliztic
web pages, which are already published as such
brochures from series [11] in PDF format.
I wish you a fruitful reading!
Jeśli preferujesz czytanie po polsku,
kliknij na polską flagę (if you prefer reading in Polish
click on the Polish flag)
Date of starting this page: 5 May 2002
Date of the latest updating of this page: 12 October 2013
(Check in "Menu 3" whether there is even a more recent update!)
