(Here is the list of all web pages from this
server, arranged by language (in 8 languages).
Choose the page that interests you by
dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:)
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking over there on
"Menu 2".)
Here is the list of addresses of all
totaliztic web sites that still worked
at the date of the most recent update
of this web page. At each of these addresses
should be available all totaliztic web pages
listed in "Menu 1" or
"Menu 2",
including also their different language versions
(i.e. versions in languages:
Polish, English, German, French, Spanish, Italian,
Greek or Russian.) Thus firstly select
the address which you wish to open by dragging
scroll bars in small window below, then click on
this address to run it. When opens the web
page which represents this address, then choose
from its "Manu 1" or
"Menu 2"
the web page which interests you and click on it
to view that page:
(The above list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 4.)
If the reader wishes to view a short filmed
illustration of the principles of operation of
the philosophy of totalizm described here,
and the illustration of scientific foundations
on which the philosophy of totalizm was
formulated, then I encourage the reader
to watch around 35 minute long video film
with my scientific portfolio, available (for free) on
YouTube.
This film is entitled
"Dr Jan Pająk portfolio"
and it is available
in English,
in Polish (po polsku) and
in German (auf Deutsch).
The more detailed descriptions, internet addresses,
links, and leaflets promoting this excellently-designed
and produced HD and HQ film, are provided in item
#J9 from this web page, as well as on the separate
web page named
portfolio.htm -
which is entirely devoted to explaining the
content and main ideas of this film. The
portfolio.htm
web page is available at all frequently upddated addresses
with totaliztic web pages, e.g. at easy to remember
pajak.org.nz and
pajak.org.nz/portfolio.htm, as well as
totalizm.com.pl/portfolio.htm.
Have a pleasant viewing,
Dr Eng. Jan Pająk - the creator of totalizm
INTRODUCTION:
This web page explains the essence of currently
the most moral and most progressive philosophy
on Earth created by man, called "totalizm". (Notice
that the human origin of totalizm is intentionally
emphasized here, because totalizm recognises,
reinforces and documents the superiority of the
Bible.)
Therefore this web page indicates what are benefits
from practicing totalizm, describes how to practice
totalizm, makes available free textbooks of totalizm,
defines basic ideas of totalizm (such as "moral field",
"moral energy", "moral laws", etc.), explains the origins
of totalizm, reveals relationships of totalizm with the scientific
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
and explains everything that initially is worth to know
about totalizm. This web page indicates also verifiable
for everyone body of evidence which confirms that
totalizm is correct, that it works in real life, and that
it really delivers what is described here.
Part #A:
Examples how totalizm helps to solve everyday problems -
means examples of a first category of benefits from practicing totalizm:
#A1.
Recipes of atheistic science would be correct only in the world deprived of God, but in the world
ruled by God everything depends on morality - as this is explained by the philosophy of totalizm:
Motto:
"Quality of everything depends on the correctness of foundations on which it was build -
so even the most majestic palace build on bog, ice or quick sand must collapse."
The non-admitted openly scientific "foundation"
of the old "atheistic
orthodox science" (i.e. this
official human science which we learn in schools
and at universities and which still carries out
exclusively "a posteriori" research - as this
is defined in item #A2.6 below) is the
non-written and highly erroneous
assumption that in there is NO God in
the universe, and thus that everything
is ruled by "deprived of intelligence" and
"blind" laws of nature. This assumption initially
resulted from the completely thoughtless use of so-called
"Occam's Razor",
but later it was adopted for the ideological foundation
of present official science. What even worse, this
old official science seems to stubbornly ignore
the fact, that such "a world without God" would
drastically differ from "the world created and
governed by intelligent God". Thus these drastic
differences between both these world could reveal
only the new "totaliztic
science". (For examples of differences
between the old, official "atheistic
orthodox science", and the new
"totaliztic science" -
see items #C1 to #C6 from my web page named
telekinetics.htm.
In turn for examples of these differences - see
items #B1 and #B2 on the web page named
changelings.htm.)
This old science stubbornly ignores also the
fact documented and even formally proven
by the new "totaliztic science", that the world
in which we live displays all attributes of the
world created and intelligently ruled by omnipotent
God - that formal proof is presented in item
#B3 of the abovementioned web page named
"changelings.htm". Hence this old atheistic
science still disseminates amongst people
the picture of life and the surrounding reality,
that would be correct only if the universe
really is NOT ruled intelligently by God. After
all, for example in such a world without God,
in fact everything would be like it is told to us
by this old atheistic science. Thus, for example
"women would be exact copies of men" - and
therefore "women would be able to do everything that
men can do" (and vice versa), the life of intelligent
beings (i.e. so-called "intellects") would rule a leaden
Darwin's principle of the "survival of fittest",
every war would be wan by militarily most powerful
side, the immoral acting would be the most beneficial,
happiness would be proportional to richness,
and thus only rich people could be happy while
all poor people would need to be unhappy. Greatest
successes in life would accomplish children of rich
parents - since they would have the best conditions
for growth and the most careful upbringing. In
turn secure and peaceful lives would lead mainly
people with power - after all only they would have
the greatest choice where to live and how to
protect themselves. In turn e.g. health and
longevity would only be proportional to the correctness
of eating, amount of exercises, and quality of
rest, thus most healthy and most log-living would
become people from the most rich countries.
On the other hand, in the world ruled intelligently
by God, everything must work on completely
different principles. After all, is such a world,
for example "women are created by God
as an extension and complement of men"
(i.e. NOT as exact copies of men) - so that the
union of men and women creates completely
new quality which is much more rich and more
perfect than both these genders composing it
(as more comprehensively this is explained in
item #B2 on the web page named
antichrist.htm).
The life of intelligent creatures in such a world
is ruled by the highly justly principle of the
"survival of most moral" (for details
see item #G1 on the web page named
will.htm) -
which replaces the Darwin's principle of the
"survival of fittest" that for the intelligent
creatures would work only in the world deprived
of wise God, while in the world ruled by God
that can be manifested only towards wild animals
deprived of conscience. In the final count every
war is lost by the country (or countries) of
aggressors - see #E3 on the web page named
bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm.
One amongst numerous
"punishments" served by God to everyone who
acted immorally, is the invalidation in the long-term
work of moral mechanisms of all benefits that this
person accomplished for the short-term due to his
or her immoral acting, combined with the additional
escalation of problems for solving of which this
immoral acting originally was taken -
for details see item #C4.2 from my web page named
morals.htm,
item #J1 from my web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm,
or item #B6 from my web page named
p_instruction.htm.
In the world governed by wise God the greatest
successes in life and highest level of happiness
experience people raised in circumstances opposite
to the rich "glasshouses" - means raised accordingly
to God's "principle of
reversals" described, amongst
others, in item #B1.1 from the web page
antichrist.htm,
in item #F3 from the web page
wszewilki_uk.htm,
and also in item #A2.10 below on this web page.
Furthermore, in such God's world, for example happiness,
security, health, or longevity, represents "rewards"
which this intelligent God gives only to those
ones who live accordingly to His commandments.
Thus, in the world with God, practically everything
is depend on "morality" that someone practices,
NOT on richness that he or she accumulated,
power gained, or just on food and exercises.
It is so because in the world
ruled by God by "morality" we should
understand the strictness with which someone fulfils
God's commandments in the everyday life -
for more information on this definition see
item #B5 on the web page named
morals.htm.
If we look carefully around the world in which we
live, then it turns out that principles and guidelines
issued to people by the old "atheistic orthodox
science" lead us to nowhere, and completely fail
to prove themselves in the real life. After all, it is
this atheistic orthodox science that caused such
big mass which we now see around us in the world.
This is because the old science ignored completely
the fact, that "in the world governed by God,
morality of people is the key to everything" (while
the Bible is the key to morality).
Notice here, that in this world governed by God
"morality" must be understood the same as it is
defined by the philosophy of totalizm, e.g. as the
abovementioned "harmony with which requirements
issued by God are obeyed in human behaviours" -
for the totaliztic definition of "morality" see abovementioned
item #B5 on the web page named "morals.htm".)
Hence, from someone's "morality" depends whether
this someone is happy, gains the respect of others,
has kind of partner and neighbours, has enough
food, etc. As this is proven on examples in item
#C1 from the web page named
quake.htm,
item #I3 from the web page named
petone.htm,
item #G1 from the web page named
will.htm,
or item #E3 and #I2 from the web page named
bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm,
it is the level of someone's morality, that decides
whether a given person, community, or nation
lives in peace and security, or rather is troubled
by cataclysms, terrorism, wars, crimes, suicides,
premature deaths, etc. Also on the morality depends
e.g. the inventiveness, and thus also the level of
technology and wealth, as well as breakthrough
scientific discoveries (as I explained this in more
details e.g. in item #B4.4 from the web page named
mozajski_uk.htm.
and also in item #G1 from the web page named
eco_cars.htm -
both of which items described the action of the
so-called "curse of inventors" which
destroys creative people in countries with a
low level of morality). It is because of the too-low
so-called "group morality" - i.e. the
morality described in item #E2 below, or more
strictly because of too high "group immorality",
that in the majority of present countries of the
world an official implementation of the "real
progress" is NOT possible anymore. (Such
a "real progress" depends on the accomplishing
e.g. truly breakthrough inventions and really new
scientific discoveries - as these are defined in
item #G4 from the web page named
eco_cars.htm.)
Only achievements that these countries are accomplishing
at present represent a "false progress" - which
depends on the multiple "chumming again" whatever is
already known to the humanity for a long time. (E.g. all signs
seems to indicate, that for some time now such a making
of "real progress", i.e. truly breakthrough inventions
and new discoveries, apparently ceased to be possible
even in the USA - means in the country which until
recently was leading the world in inventiveness and
in scientific discoveries. In turn already for a long
time it is difficult to hear about the existence of any
world-famous inventor or a genius scientists, who
would officially carry out his creativity e.g. in Australia,
New Zealand, or present Poland. The reason always
seem to be the same - i.e. shifting in there to practicing
a wrong kind of "group morality" which is based e.g.
on a momentary belief of "atheistic luminaries of science",
or on behaviours of politicians, rich people, or celebrities,
instead of on timeless commands of God.) The attribute
of inhabitants of countries which are characterised by
incorrect "group morality" is, that unanimously they destroy
and persecute these their countrymen, who do NOT follow
the "sheep trend", policies of authorities, or fashion from
a given country, but they have own opinion about a given
matter - as e.g. in New Zealand was persecuted and destroyed
Richard Pearse.
This is where originates the "curse of inventors" which
rages in there, as well as the "inventive impotency"
which stems from this curse.
God issued to people a whole array of guidelines,
according to which He wishes that people voluntarily
live, and the level of fulfilment of which God
uses for His judgement whether a given person
or community is to be "rewarded" or "punished"
(e.g. with cataclysms). These God’s guidelines,
or commandments, can be found in all religions,
and also in all holy books, e.g. in the
Bible.
But the religious manner of writing of these moral
guidelines has several drawbacks. For example,
they are written with quite an ancient language -
which present people avoid to respect. Furthermore,
in order to inspire people to seek knowledge creatively,
God revealed with the use of religion only "what"
rules of morality people should voluntarily obey, but He
did NOT explain "why" people should stick to
these rules. For this reason, there was a need to develop
the "philosophy of totalizm" and a new science
based on this philosophy - which the author calls the
"totaliztic science". The philosophy of totalizm
and the totaliztic science objectively research goals,
methods, and ways of God, using for this research
most sound and modern scientific methods. Then
they formulate moral guidelines for the human behaviour,
based on results of this research. As the outcome,
totalizm arrives to the same moral recommendations
as these commanded by the
Bible.
But in addition, these recommendations of totalizm
are already expressed in present (modern) language,
for each one of them totalizm indicates the justification
"why" it needs to be obeyed, and together with each
one of them totalizm explains what goal, intention,
or method of God's action causes that this moral
principle should be voluntarily obeyed by people.
Sub-items from the item #A2 of this web page,
summarise several examples of just such principles
of moral behaviour worked out by totalizm. These
examples are to illustrate the essence of outcomes
of my research, as well as attributes of this currently
the most moral, most modern, most correct, and the
most progressive philosophy on the Earth created
by a man.
#A1.1.
The most vital advice of totalizm: do NOT be fooled by the short-term
consequences of "moral field" work, which seem to "reward immorality"
and "persecute morality":
Motto:
"Are you NOT puzzled why lives of people are formed
into one long chain of moral lessons, tests and exams?
After all, continuous lessons, tests and exams may have
only one goal - namely selecting a few best of the best,
from a large crowd of already good ones."
I cannot stop marvelling over the genius of
pre-programmed by God the so-called
"principle of contradiction between
the short-term and long-term effects of the work
of moral field" - discovered only by totalizm
and briefly summarized in item #H2 of this web
page, while accurately described, among others,
in items #C4.2.1 and #C4.2 of the web page named
morals.htm
and illustrated in "Fig. #I1" from the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.
This contradiction (reversal) of effects allows that
in the short-term work of moral field for all impatient
and blind people may appear that "immorality pays off",
but simultaneously that in the long-term work of
moral field the justice is restored, because
immoral acting people are severely punished,
while morally acting people are handsomely
rewarded. As a result, this reversal of short-term
and long-term work of "moral field" allows God
to quickly classify subsequent people and group
intellects to the moral or immoral classes (after
which classifying they can be treated as it is
explained in item #C4.7 from the web page
morals.htm),
to check people's readiness for accepting the moral
lessons and for implementing these lessons in
everyday lives, to test the intelligence and dedication
of subsequent people, to check who is suited for
the future coexistence with God, while who systematically
breaks moral criteria and thus must be removed
prematurely from this world according to the
described below in #A2.7 "principle of the extinction
of most immoral intellects", etc., etc. That is precisely
because of this reversal, when
you do something morally correct, then rather be happy
and treat it as a "good omen" if immediately (i.e. during
the completion of given activities) you come across
various obstacles and problems. However, begin
to act very carefully and wisely (even to the point of
abandoning a given activity) if everything goes for you
"like a Swiss clockwork" and if all circumstances seem
to help you in whatever you are doing as well as instantly
reward you for what you are doing - means when the
behaviour of moral field seem to indicate that you
just carry out an immoral activity. The
reasons for which I give you here this advice
you may learn after the careful reading, among others,
abovementioned items #C4.2.1 and #C4.2 from the web page named
morals.htm,
and also after reading the other totaliztic publications
which illustrate examples and explain the operation
of "moral field", for example items #N1 as well as #B5
and #F3 from the web page named
solar.htm,
items #B4 and #C2 from the web page named
pajak_re_2017.htm,
item #I2 from the web page named
bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm,
etc., etc. Here I explain only, that in a world ruled by all-powerful
and all-seeing God, the "immoral acting" NEVER pays off,
because all the apparent
benefits that in the short-term work of moral field seems to
bring the violation of moral criteria, are carefully invalidated
in the long-term work of moral field, at the same time all
the problems which a given immoral acting supposed
to solve are escalated further - as excellent
examples of just such invalidation of the apparent benefits
of immoral acting and the escalation of problems that it
supposed to solve, consider the consequences of immoral
implementation of pesticides, antibiotics, and the theory of
relativity described in item #J1 from my web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.
Thus, the only human acting which
actually brings permanent benefits, is the acting that fulfils
the criteria of morality (i.e. which is the pedantically moral
acting) - for explanations see item #B4 of my web page named
pajak_re_2017.htm.
Until now only a small handful of people bothered
to learn about powerful tools that God
has created to be able to precisely control literally
every second of life of each person. These tools
have only recently been discovered due to the
use of different research methods of the new
"totaliztic science" - while under the names
"omniplan" and "reversible software
time" are summarized, among others, in
the introduction and in item #G4 of my web
page named
dipolar_gravity.htm,
and are described in detail in items #C4 and
#C4.1 from another my web page named
immortality.htm.
But even without the knowledge of these
powerful tools of God, still those more perceptive
individuals eventually notice, that the life of
every human has too many regularities and
similarities to be governed just by "pure coincidences" -
as erroneously makes us to believe the present
official science. After all, "pure coincidences"
are NOT e.g. able to cause, that practically
every person sustains roughly similar amount
of happiness and successes as well as misfortunes
and problems - and this irrespective of his/her
wealth or power, that all events which affect us
display attributes of moral lessons, or that the fate
of each person is controlled by the level of passing
moral exams. All this together further confirms the
truth about which I am warning in the motto to this
item - namely, that to morality is worth to devote
our utmost attention, because the way it impacts
our lives proves that it serves for the immensely
important choosing of the very few best of the best
from a sizeable group of already quite perfect.
In turn where such a choice takes place, there
is also a certainty, that later it is to serve for an
equally important further consequences.
After learning the above categorical finding of "totalizm",
that "immorality never
pays off", and after learning the finding of the new
"totaliztic science" that "immorality
is one amongst the tools used to educate people
and to examine their suitability for divine purposes",
in the reader probably arises the question "why
in present times so many people deliberately close
their eyes to the truth and choose the irrational
belief that in life it is beneficial to behave immorally?"
The answer to this question is equally complex as that proverbial
"Gordian knot".
After all, in order to properly respond to it, we have to agree,
among others, with what in details is explained in item
#B1.1 from the web page named
antichrist.htm -
namely that God purposely so designs our life, that
with the help of the consequences of work of the
"principle of reversals"
our life is upbringing us into "soldiers of God"
hardened in overcoming every kind of difficulties, and that all events
which affect us in life are designed in advance to serve
as "moral lessons" honed in us lasting habits of morally
correct behaviour, and to test (examine) the level at which
we are already implementing the principles of morally
correct conduct. However, I still will try to "cut" here through
that "Gordian knot" to show the reader what it is composed
of. Here are the most common upbringing activities and
subsequent moral tests or exams, to which we are constantly
subjected (although most of us do not have the slightest
idea about their existence), supplemented by my brief
explanation of "why" every one of them makes an impression
as if it rewards immorality while punishes morally correct behaviour:
1.
Test on respect for moral traditions. In my opinion
the primary reason for increasingly common today
erroneous belief that "immorality pays off", is the testing
of our respect for the morally-correct traditions. The reason
for this test is that people who cannot bring themselves
to respect the past and traditions which created them,
cannot also bring themselves to respect anything else,
including their own parents and God. In this test, for
example the "toys" that our ancestors had to invent,
because until recently they have NOT existed (e.g.
computers, cell-phones, colour television, jet planes,
cars, etc.) are used to amaze and to tell today's generations
of people, that due to the use of such "trinkets" these
generations supposedly become "more superior" than
generations of these ancestors who invented these
"toys" - see descriptions of the generation of "Midases
in reverse" from items #K5 and #K6 of the web page
tapanui.htm.
In turn, by being such supposedly "better" generations,
they have the right to "trample with their boots" over the
traditions of our ancestors, which traditions already have
proven themselves working for thousands of years.
So some people fooled by those "trinkets", actually
trample, among others, over the already established
for a long time e.g. the Bible verses and folk wisdom
stating that "immorality never pays off" - e.g. consider
what percentage of people today takes notice of the
true importance of the proverb "Though the mills of
God grind slowly, yet they grind exceeding small",
or the Polish-language counterpart of it, stating that
"God does not act rapidly, but acts justy"
(in Polish: "Bóg nierychliwy ale sprawiedliwy").
2.
Test on believing today's mass media, that advocate "quick
successes" achieved at any cost, but remain silent about
the long-term consequences of immoral actions.
All our current mass media (including television) are
so controlled, that they produce long programs on
"how effortlessly get a quick success in life", but that
typically they are silent about disclosing to audiences
"what happened in the long-term work of moral field
with all those people who almost effortlessly achieved
rapid success in life" (i.e. "what after the elapse of
so-called. 'time of karma return' happened to these
people, about whom moral field and moral mechanisms
knew in advance that they belong to those 'bad trees
that are to yield only bad fruit' " - described in item
#C4.7 from the web page named
morals.htm,
and hence whom the "moral field" in its short-term
work "helped" to get a success in life).
3.
The test on believing in claims of official science, which
does NOT hide its atheism and openly avoids researching
of the actual work of moral field and moral mechanisms -
and thus which fulfils the Biblical definition of a "bad tree
that is NOT going to yield good fruit" (for more details see
item #C4.7 from the web page
morals.htm
and item #K1 from the web page named
tapanui.htm).
This test checks the people's belief in false and constantly
changed claims of present, official, monopolistic science,
i.e. the belief persisting in spite that these people know that
the present official science has been built on atheistic (i.e.
false) foundations, that it refuses to undertake research on
requirements of "true morality" (about requirements
of "true morality" almost everyone knows, that these can
originate only from God), and that as such, according to the
Bible, the present official science is NOT able to give birth
to any "good fruit", but yields only "bad fruit"
that will only harm those people who are greedy enough
to eat it. In general terms, this test boils down to checking
whom a given person is to believe, when he or she is forced
to choose between whatever in a given matter indicate our senses,
logic, empirical experience, evidence, etc., but what is officially
denied by scientists who look at the world from armchairs
and through thick windows of their "ivory towers" - as an
excellent example of the necessity of making just such a
choice, see descriptions from item #E2 of the web page named
cloud_ufo.htm.
For example, this test checks whether a given person
is already deterred by the situation, that the present
official and monopolistic science - which leads a highly
prosperous and trouble-free life due to research-grants
received from the power-hungry politicians and from the
greedy industries (e.g. armaments), has NO courage
to promote any morally-correct truth, e.g. the truth that
"in the long-term work of moral
mechanisms every war is always lost by an aggressor" -
broadly explained, among others, in item #I2 from the web page
bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm,
that this science constantly changes its official statements
and the contents of its textbooks, that is growing the number
of its findings and statements that appear to be mutually
contradictory, that instead of promoting the progress, this
science persecutes and holds down every new ideas that
are incompatible with its atheistic doctrines - such as, for
example, the theory of everything called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
or the starship called the
Magnocraft,
etc., etc. From what I noticed, this exam on belief in the claims
of present official science, especially commonly fail women -
obviously the opinions of titled experts mean for them more
than logic, evidence, and common sense. For example, it is sufficient
that somewhere they read an interview with someone with numerous
titles, that, for example, allegedly smoking reduces overweight,
and immediately they throw themselves onto cigarettes, knowing
that these are to kill not only them, but also their family members.
Just it suffices that some prize-winning researcher of e.g. cranks
recommends in TV to NOT discipline children, but rather keep
convincing them like adults, and immediately they report to
police if anyone tries to implement what the Bible commands
about the disciplining of small brats. It is just enough that in an
illustrated magazine they read that a celebrity wife of some rich
doctor eats certain weeds, instead of meals, and immediately this
weed becomes the only dish in dinners NOT only for themselves,
but also for their husbands and families. It just suffices that on the
Internet they read what some dictatorial government state regarding
salt, and immediately they ignore thousands of years of natural
regulation of the demand for salt by our senses of taste and thirst,
and force the whole family to eat everything without salt
(see #D2 on the web page named
healing.htm).
Etc., etc.
4.
The tests on noticing distortions of virtually all religious
institutions. About testing of our level of noticing
the deviations of practically all religious institutions
in today's world one could write whole volumes (e.g.
see item #A2.7 from this web page). But if we try to
summarize these tests in a few sentences, they boil
down, among others, to examining: (1) our noticing and
remedying of the increasingly deeper departure of religions
from doing what God commands them to do in holy books,
but instead implementation of whatever imperfect human
leaders of these religions tell others that they ought to do,
(2) noticing and correcting the disappearance of teaching
morality by religions, (3) noticing the avoidance of religions
to research scientifically God's methods of work which are
commonly used in the present everyday life, (4) remedying
the negligence of religions in the empirical checking and
confirming of every religious truth (in turn truths, which
were NOT subjected to rigorous checking and confirming
that later can be verified and approved by practically every
interested person, cannot change their status from "belief"
into "certainty"), (5) stopping the politicization of religions -
that is, stopping the caring of religions mainly about the
power over people and about the political influence and
income, instead about the service for God. Etc., etc.
5.
The tests on knowledge of the work of moral field and
moral mechanisms. For example, each one of us
is repetitively taught and then examined whether he/she
is already aware of the fact, that in the short-term work
of moral field and moral mechanisms these tools of God
only give an impression that "immorality pays off", while
the actual punishment for immorality comes only in the
long-term work of moral field and moral mechanisms -
it is summarised in item #H2 from this web page, while in
detail it is explained in item #C4.2 of the web page
morals.htm.
6.
The test on the enthusiasm for persecuting and on hostility
directed at everything that is moral - e.g. on every truth, on
the "philosophy of totalizm", on the new "totaliztic science", etc.
In this moral exam, people with immoral tendencies are "provoked"
to attack and to suppress everything that is morally correct - e.g.
every truth. It is from this test that originate, for example, such
phenomena as the "curse of inventors", or as the vicious suppression
with which the "philosophy of totalizm" and the new "totaliztic
science" are troubled by various immoral forces - for examples
of some forms of such suppression, see item #B5 from my web page named
tapanui.htm,
or items #J1 and #P5.1 from my web page named
quake.htm.
As another example of such suppression I should also disclose
here that, for example, whenever in my professional life of an
university professor I met up with the announcement of a university
position in philosophical sciences focused on research and development
of new philosophy, I always applied for this position - justifying my
application by the need to further develop the already widely known
in the world my philosophy of totalizm devoted to the "true morality".
But in spite that I made hundreds of applications for such positions,
and in spite that already then the achievements of totalizm
exceeded everything that other philosophers have developed
so far in the area of our learning the principles of moral mechanisms,
NOT even a single of my applications was ever successful. Today's
official science clearly does NOT want to have anything to do with
academics who study and popularize the truth about the work of
"true morality". (Note here, how extremely difficult it is to research
and to popularize the knowledge about the true work of mechanisms
of morality, if one is constantly expelled from the job, and if the bulk
of one's energy must be spend on earning the bread and on keeping
alive by lecturing e.g. the Software Engineering that is avoided by other
professors and has little to do with what one is actually researching,
and also if one is surrounded by a collection of hostile people who
shout insults and continually put down of what one has already
managed to accomplish.)
7.
The test on such programming of the current systems of
governance (including virtually all of today's democracies),
which causes almost exclusively immoral actions of governments.
It is this test that causes, that if someone matches today's
decisions of governments to moral criteria - which matching,
among others, sometimes I do and which also should periodically
be done by every other citizen familiar with work of "actual morality",
then it turns out that practically
almost everything that today's governments make or decide,
breaks various criteria of morality, and thus in the long-term
work of moral field all the benefits that initially stemmed from
it must be cancelled as the punishment, while the problems
that these measures or laws were to solve must be escalated
as the punishment. As excellent examples of today's
breaking of moral criteria consider the presently existing "privacy
laws" - that help to hide from people the committed immoralities
and hamper learning about the actual work of moral field and
moral mechanisms, or consider the introduced almost everywhere
GST (also known as VAT), which works like sand thrown in the gears
of working machine, and which is ruining economically the country
that recklessly has introduced it - for details see items #T1 to
#T5 from my web page named
humanity.htm.
More information on the subject of contradictive to moral
criteria activities of governments can be found, among
others, in items #J1 and #I1 from my web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm,
and items #B1 to #B8 from my web page named
pajak_re_2017.htm.
Of course, there is incomparably more moral lessons,
tests and examinations similar to those listed above.
Here I indicated just a few most common examples.
I was always intrigued by the thoughtlessness of
people who play the "armchair philosophers", and
with a loud voice full of admiration for the shrewdness
of their own mind deliver in public opinions such as
"we cannot believe in the existence of God, when
we see the enormity of suffering, trouble and struggles
of men, when we see little kids dying from some painful
illness, as well as when we see microbes, mosquitoes,
tapeworms, venomous snakes, crocodiles ..." Hearing
this kinds of opinions I want to ask: "if you were god, would
you create the world without pain, struggles, challenges,
lessons, exams, work, deadly organisms, etc., which would
be filled only with pleasures, self-supplying refrigerators
and cups to which the supply of tasty wines and drinks
would never have ended?" And if YES, then what you
would do with those billions of immortal people that are
used exclusively to pleasure and that cannot themselves
do anything other than emptying their self-supplying
refrigerators and cups? Yet you could not kill them,
because death is also unpleasant. You could not order
them to do anything, because the work is, after all, the
effort, challenge, exam and the requirement to acquire
skills - that is also a whole series of unpleasantness.
(I am NOT going here to philosophize that even pleasure,
in which one is forced to live for eternity, with time has
become an unpleasant chore.) For many years in different
places of my publications I am explaining to this type of
"armchair philosophers", that a world devoid of pain,
unpleasantness, threats, fears, struggle, demands, laws,
homework, exams, challenges, responsibilities, work, etc.,
would be an useless form of nightmare and hell - just only
an extremely inexperienced creator would agree to create
and maintain it for longer than a short initial period of the
childhood and learning of first humans. In addition, all-righteous
God, like ours, even in the world having all of these unpleasant
"attractions", can so choose who has to meet which kind of
unpleasantness, that nothing unpleasant affects people
who previously did NOT deserve it. Examples of publications
explaining and documenting these facts, may be: item #A3
from my web page named
god_proof.htm,
item #G1 from my web page named
will.htm,
item #D3 from my web page named
god_exists.htm,
and items #D1 to #D6 from my web page named
newzealand_visit.htm
that summarize the role of "paradise".
However, seeing the universality of such a misunderstanding
of the constructive, motivating and balancing role that for people
fulfils the pain, death, fear, responsibilities, lessons, exams, work,
challenges, etc., I suspect that one day I should write and allow
to read, a full article similar to this one,
which would explain to this type of "armchair philosophers" what
a useless nightmare and hell would be the creation and maintaining
of a world filled up only with pleasures - after which writing, in this
place I should place a link to such an article.
Although what I have described in this item is only
an advice from totalizm, NOT e.g. the law
or an explanation, still it reveals that in view of the
increasingly widespread "failing" of moral tests and
examinations by people, on one hand we should
sympathize with those people, what systematically
fail these trials. (After all, NOT without the reason a
wise proverb states that "everyone receives in life
what he or she previously has earned".) On the
other hand, we should treat as a kind of miracle
and the reason to wonder, that in today's world
there is still existing this handful of exceptionally
special people, who in spite of everything, know,
openly insist and keep proving to everyone, that
for certain "immorality does not pay off". (In item
#I1 from my web page named
quake.htm
these exceptional individuals are described under
the Biblical name of "righteous".) As it can
be seen, "the philosophy of totalizm" and born from
it the new "totaliztic science" are now having the
increasingly difficult task ahead - i.e. to re-disclose
to typical people today, what is NOT revealed to them
neither by present religions, by present official science
and education, by present governments, nor by famous
people providing role-models, i.e. to re-disclose what
a huge mistake people make due to their short-sighted
belief that "immorality pays off", as well as people make
due to the behaviour resulting from the belief that
supposedly "morally correct behaviour totally does
not count in life."
#A2.
Let us learn several examples of general guidelines on how to act in our lives
(i.e. guidelines identified, worked out and recommended by the philosophy of totalizm):
Motto:
"Since the ancient times people seek a 'medicine for everything'. Such a medicine really exists - it is
called 'morality'. Only that in order to use it effectively, it is necessary to know the philosophy of totalizm."
If someone already learned the entire philosophy
of totalizm, then also learned mechanisms
and principles which God uses in His control
over fate of people and in His guiding us to
behaviours that God expects from us. In turn,
after learning these mechanisms and principles,
our knowledge as to how act in specific life
situations becomes automatic. But this
web page is mainly addressed for people,
who do NOT know totalizm yet. Thus,
in order to illustrate also for them how
look-like general guidelines for our acting
in everyday life - as recommended by the
philosophy of totalizm, below I am indicating
several examples of these guidelines.
All examples provided here stem from the
consequently implemented by God
"principles of guiding"
people into the most desirable
behaviours which God expects from us -
i.e. principles described also in item #C6
from my another web page named
god_exists.htm.
The examples presented below reveal
recommendations of totaliztic behaviours
in the face of most common problems of
everyday lives. Of course, a wider and
more complete set of recommendations
is explained in textbooks of totalizm - listed
in item #A4 below.
#A2.1.
In making decisions "always do exact opposite of whatever is indicated by the 'line of the least moral resistance' ":
In our everyday life we continually must make
decisions on how we should act
or what we should do in a given situation.
The complacency and inborn human laziness
push us to choose the action which lies on
the so-called "line of the least intellectual
resistance". Unfortunately, decisions and actions
that follow the "line of the least intellectural resistance"
always after some elapse of time turn out to be wrong
and immoral. Thus, always then they prove
themselves to be detrimental, always must
be corrected, always the decision maker
is charged with the moral responsibility for
damages that they cause, and always one
needs to live through the shame and dishonour
of their erroneousness and immorality. After
all, decisions and actions "along the line of
the least intellectual resistance" run exactly down
in the so-called "moral field", and thus it is known
in advance that they are "immoral". (This "moral
field" is described in item #H2 below this web
page, while principles of its interaction with
our minds during making our mental decisions
are explained, amongst others, in items #C4.2
and #C4.2.1 from my web page named
morals.htm,
and in "Fig. #I1" and item #J1 from my web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.)
It is just because people most frequently act
along such a "line of the least intellectual
resistance", that our civilisation
found itself in the present "black hole".
After all, the physical world is ruled by the
law that everything following the "line of the
least resistance" always lands in the deepest
hole (e.g. consider water or cosmic
"black holes"). In turn, from such a hole
it is extremely difficult to come out later.
Therefore, the philosophy of totalizm recommends
that every decision and every action
in the life we should carry out along the
direction which is opposite to the "line of
the least moral (intellectual) resistance"
(i.e. along the direction which lies on the "line
of the greatest moral (intellectual) effort").
This is because such decisions lie on the
"line of the greatest moral effort" (i.e. lie
uphill in the "moral field") - and thus they
always are "moral". In turn, by being "moral"
they never turn to be erroneous. But the
problem depends on the fact, that in typical
life situation it is quite difficult to establish
what action would lie on the "line of the
greatest moral (intellectual) effort". But it
always is easy to establish what in a given
situation would be the most "immoral action" -
i.e. what in a given situation would lie on the
so-called "line of the least moral (intellectual)
effort". Therefore, instead of a long thinking
what we should do to make it the most moral,
it is enough to instantly determine what would be
the most immoral action in a given situation (and
such determining takes only a split of second),
and then we should do an exact opposite to
this most immoral action. For example, if
someone offers a bribe to us, the most
immoral action would be to accept this bribe.
Therefore we should act opposite to accepting
it in a given situation. Similarly, when someone
hurts us or offends us, the most immoral would
be a revenge. Therefore we should act opposite
to a revenge. Etc., etc.
It is worth to notice, that characteristics of the
"moral field" and consequences of our actions
"uphill" and "downhill" in that field, are also
discussed in a number of other totaliztic web
pages, for example in items #B1 to #B8 and
#C2 from the web page named
pajak_re_2017.htm,
in items #J1 and #I1 from the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm,
or in item #F1 of a different web page named
rok_uk.htm.
#A2.2.
Mischievous inanimate nature, illnesses and problems control most effectively through corrections in own believes:
For a very vital reason (described e.g. in
subsection A16 of
monograph [1/5]),
God adopted and consequently applies, the
principle of interactions with people, which
is really worth to learn. This principle is the
source of many events which affect practically
every person. Namely, it states that every
intellect (e.g. every individual person, every
community, every scientific discipline, etc.)
always receives from God confirmations
for beliefs that this intellect is using as a
basis for its behaviour or actions.
Such confirmations are issued by God
to even these intellects which believe in
something that actually do NOT exists in
the real physical world - only that in such
a case God realistically "simulates" what
would happen if it existed. According
to this principle, people who believe that
e.g. some "talisman" brings them good luck,
actually gain a good luck from that talisman.
For people who believe in some superstition,
this superstition actually works. People who
believe in indications of radiesthesia, the
radiesthesia really helps. People who deeply
believe that something is to heal them, God
actually heals after taking this something
(thus e.g. comes the medical term of
"placebo effects"). People who believe
in UFOs actually do see UFOs. People
who believe in Yeti or in monsters (of the
"Nessie" kind) receive confirmations that
Yeti or these monsters actually do exist.
To people who believe strongly in demons,
devils, or ghosts, God shows such demons,
devils, or ghosts. People who believe in
heaven and hell, actually receive manifestations
of the existence of heaven and hell. People
who believe in reincarnation, receive confirmations
of consequences of reincarnation - consider the
example of simulated reincarnation that I experienced
and described in item #J1 from the web page
malbork_uk.htm.
Etc., etc.
The problem with such strong beliefs depends
on the fact, that if someone believes in something
that is unpleasant, evil, or detrimental to people,
God also manifests it for him or her. Thus, people
who strongly believe that they e.g. are to fall ill on
something, or that they are to have an accident,
in fact experience this illness or that accident -
e.g. see item #G1 from the web page
healing.htm.
In turn to people who strongly believe e.g. in
UFOs or in demons, these evil creatures begin
to play "unpleasant tricks" - as if they really
acted on the Earth and started to pick just on
these people. Therefore in all life situations
when we are plagued by some sequences of
unexplained "mischievous of nature", illnesses,
problems, etc., totalizm recommends to most
easily and most effectively get rid of these through
correcting our believes. If we are able to
determine which our belief is the source of given
problems, and then we change this belief into
a deep belief that our problem results from the
principle of God's acting described here, then
the problem is to vanish.
Totalizm recommends, that in order to so correct
one's belief, firstly one needs to review of own
deep beliefs (which sometimes can be well hidden
and almost subconscious). The point is that we
need to determine which one amongst our beliefs,
if it is supported by God with given evidence,
would become the source of our problems.
This phase of elimination of our problems is
the most difficult, because sometimes the
"cause-effect chain" between our belief and
our problems can be quite long and complicated.
Then one needs to change this particular belief,
into the deep belief that such our problems are
just consequences of the "simulation" by God
of the body of evidence which is to illustrate
for us consequences of whatever we believe.
For example, instead of deeply believing in the
permanent existence of physical UFOnauts -
when our almost new car, computer, washing
machine, toilet, etc., rapidly are spoiled,
we should start to believe that our problems
stem from the fact that we believe in UFOs,
so in order to illustrate for us what would
happen when such evil UFOnauts actually
operate on the Earth, good God "simulates"
for us "tricks" that such evil UFOnauts would
play on us and that would manifest themselves
in spoiling our devices that are susceptible to
detrimental action of the magnetic field of UFO
vehicles.
As with everything that God does, also the
principle described here is to develop in people
moral knowledge and wisdom, as well as the
fast ability to distinguish truth from false, good
from evil, authentic from a fabrication, etc.
Therefore, in His "simulations" of manifestations
of someone's belief, God additionally imprints
the information about a "moral value" of the
belief itself. This information is always aligned
with the reliable God's principle, which in the
ancient language of the Bible is expressed
with the words: "a healthy tree bears good
fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit" (see
the Bible, Matthew, verse 7:17 - while for
the interpretation of this verse see item
#C4.7 from the web page named
morals.htm).
Therefore, beliefs into the correcting of which God
persuades us through the "simulation" of detrimental,
unpleasant, destructive, etc., manifestations of
their consequences, in fact are false, non-authentic,
anti-God, anti-human, etc. - while people believing
in them should immediately change them into the
correct ones, or completely cease believing in them.
In other words, from what manifestations of "fruits"
of someone's belief return to a given believer, one
should recognise whether this belief is true or false,
whether it serves for the good of people or is
detrimental for the humanity, etc. (As an example
consider suffering and disasters that are connected
with the "simulations" of "skeletons of dinosaurs"
described in item #A1 of the totaliztic web page
evolution.htm.)
This recommendation of totalizm is also disseminated
by atheists under the name of "positive thinking".
However, in the totaliztic recipe described here it is
more effective from the "positive thinking" and it is
applicable in the elimination of practically all human
problems. After all, it is following the God's intentions,
is boils down to enforcing our knowledge about God
and our morality, and it also serves to the uplifting of
human wisdom, inquisitiveness, life experience, etc.
* * *
In item #C5.1 from the web page
seismograph.htm,
I am explaining how I would apply the above
method to stop cataclysms that already plague
the city of Christchurch in New Zealand. But
notice that the method outlined in there applies
to all cities and all communities in the world
(i.e. it applies to all so-called "group intellects"
defined briefly in item #E2 below, while controlled
by moral mechanisms explained in items #B2
to #B4.4 of the web page
mozajski_uk.htm).
#A2.3.
From catastrophes and from extremes of nature defend yourself and your loved ones
by surrounding yourself with a group of at least "10 righteous":
Starting from around 1992, due to "contributions"
of our well-paid science, the humanity is openly
in the "state of war with its God" - for more details
see descriptions from item #K1 and "Tab. #K1" of
my web page named
tapanui.htm.
The continuation of the present blind belief of
people in erroneous claims of "atheistic orthodox
science" additionally escalates this our open
"war with God", instead of easing it down.
In the result, everyone amongst us should
be prepared, that the present cataclysms,
catastrophes, extremes of weather and nature,
etc., will be intensified as time elapses. So it is
worth to begin to listen to the guidelines of totalizm
as how to defend oneself from all these.
Totalizm recommends, that the best defence
against cataclysms, catastrophes, extremes
of weather and nature, etc., resorted in "crisis
situations" when these disasters already trouble
us and hang above our heads, depends on
surrounding ourselves with a group of at least
10 people who fulfil the definition of so-called
"righteous" - means people defined more
precisely in item #I1 from my web page
quake.htm,
which live precisely according to either what
in the ancient language recommends to us the
Bible,
or what with the modern language (and present
examples) recommends the philosophy of totalizm.
(Notice that the philosophy
of totalizm actually is a "generator of righteous people".
This is because people who practice the so-called
"formal totalizm" described below in item #C1,
in reality also fulfil the highly demanding definition
of "righteous" from the Bible.)
This method of defence results from the fact that
God granted a guarantee in the Bible, that
these communities in the midst of which lives
at least 10 highly moral persons that fulfil the
demanding definition of "righteous", are protected
from consequences of any cataclysms.
This God's guarantee is recorded in the Biblical
"Book of Genesis, verses 18:23-32. In turn the
actual keeping this guarantee in real life and in
present times, I checked in person on the township
of Petone in New Zealand (in which I live), while
I documented it in item #I3 of two web pages named
petone.htm and
day26.htm.
In fact, this Petone, in the vicinity of which
live such "10 righteous" with highly totaliztic
morality, is omitted by all cataclysms which
lately almost continually trouble New Zealand.
(Some amongst these cataclysms are described,
amongst others, in item #C5 of the web page named
seismograph.htm,
in item #D5 of the web page named
fruit.htm,
and also in item #N1 of the web page named
solar.htm.)
Unfortunately, NOT in every place of living one
can surround himself or herself with these at least
"10 righteous" - for a simple reason, that there is
increasingly less of them on Earth. So if such
people are lacking in the place of our living, nor
we are able to convince 9 amongst our friends
to join us - so that together we would form such
a group of "10 righteous" that would pedantically
practice the philosophy of "formal totalizm", while
the place of our living is already endangered by
deadly cataclysms, then perhaps we should
consider either shifting to a different area,
or "importing" the lacking "righteous" from
elsewhere. In turn, if such a shifting or "importing"
is out of question, then still we can defend
ourselves by practicing totalizm just on our own.
After all, even if our lone practice of totalizm
does NOT defend from a cataclysm the community
amongst which we live, it still for sure is to defend
just us. This is because even when our possessions
will need to be destroyed by the cataclysm send
by God, still - because of our pedantic practicing
of totalizm we ourselves for sure become somehow
spared, or saved.
* * *
In item #I3.1 from the web page
day26.htm
is explained, that the "gift" of such "10 righteous"
to protect against cataclysms the area in which
they live, can probably be "projected" onto a single
selected "righteous" person. Unfortunately, I do
not have the required research funds to verify
experimentally such a possibility.
#A2.4.
If you are "pushed against a wall" or "cornered", then seek the hidden
"doors of exit from the situation" that God prepared in there especially for you:
All inhabitants of the physical world, even those
ones who behave most morally, occasionally
God subjects to periodic exams, tests, checks,
etc. - for details see item #A1.1 above on this web
page. These are aimed at teaching us the awareness
and perseverance, and simultaneously at testing
what each one of us is capable of, how his or
her skills compare to skills of other people, etc.
These God's exams, tests, checks, etc., sometimes
may even depends on the proverbial "pushing
us against a wall" or on "cornering" us. But they
are to test us, not to destroy us. Therefore,
always before creating the situation which is
to "push us against a wall" or to "corner us", God
firstly prepares especially for us in this wall or
in this corner a well-hidden "door" which allows
that these moral ones amongst us can escape
from the situation without any harm. Thus, the
main our task is to find this "door" in even the
most difficult situations, and then to use it for our
advantage. Therefore, totalizm recommends
that if you know that in life you mainly act
morally, then after finding yourself in the situation
which appears to have no exist, you shouldn't
ever give up, but always find this "exit
door" which God prepared long in advance
especially for you.
The existence of such "exit doors" in every situation,
even that most hopelessly looking, is confirmed
by folk wisdom, e.g. through proverbs of the kind
like the Polish "when God shuts the door, he always
leaves open a small window". The fact that such
an "exist door" God always prepares for us in
every difficult situation is also emphasized in
the Bible, e.g. with the example of the famous
escape of Jews from Egyptians through the Red Sea.
Just because of this biblical escape, the totaliztic
principle described here stating that "we never
should give up and always seek this hidden 'exit
door' from a given situation", in my descriptions
from #6A in subsection I4.1.1 of volume 5 in
monograph [1/5],
I call this principle the "law of a highway through a sea".
#A2.5.
In your adult life be careful to NOT sabotage the plans and intentions of God, because
your adult behaviour decides about what was happening to you in the young age:
Totalizm teaches, that what affects people
in young age is actually shaped by what these
people are doing in their adult age. Of course,
NOT every person has the intellect capable of
understanding that whatever they do as adults,
in fact decides about what happened to them
as children or teenagers. After all, people think
in chronological categories. Thus everything
that is earlier in time they consider to be a
cause, while everything that happens
later they consider to be an effect.
However, God sees all times at once. After
all, God intentionally created the
"reversible software time"
described in item #C4 from the web page named
immortality.htm
and in the introduction and item #G4 from the web page named
dipolar_gravity.htm -
so that He is able to always see not only the
presence and past, but also the future. So
everything that people do at any time and that
introduces vital consequences for other people,
for God becomes a cause, while the
effect (that represents the reaction
of God on this cause) God implements in the
moment of time which from the God's prospective
is the most adequate - frequently a long time
before the elapse of the software human time
arrives to the cause of that particular reaction
of God. Therefore people whose intellects are
unable to understand this capability of God, that
effects of someone's actions are served sometimes
much earlier than causes do occur, can only
feel in their lives a kind of "supervision" or "care".
Means, they only notice, that their lives in young
age were like intentionally by someone controlled,
so that in the adult age they could accomplish or
do whatever they did. But in reality the situation
is completely reversed. Namely, in reality God
first checks what a given person is going to do
in the entire its life, and only then God so directs
the life of that person, that this doing agrees with
plans and intentions of God. This is the reason
for which we all should watch whether we do
as adults only things that are agreeable with
recommendations, plans, and methods of God
(revealed to us by the Bible and philosophy of totalizm),
because whatever we do as adults is to decide
what happened to us in the young age.
The full understanding of the above recommendation
of totalizm requires the explanation "why" God
acts like this. Unfortunately, it so happens that
the explanation "why" is quite complex and exceeds
the size of this web page. But it is described in
other my publications. Therefore, for this explanation
I recommend to look in additional sources which
I am indicating here. To these sources belong,
amongst others, the second part of the descriptions
from the web page
god_exists.htm,
and also item #F1 from the web page
rok_uk.htm.
Furthermore, more extensive explanations on the
topic of dependence of what happens to us in a
young age from what we do in the adult age, are
provided in subsections NG5.7, NG5.6 and A16
from my newest
monograph [1/5].
#A2.6.
For true knowledge - research God and extrapolate your findings to the world around,
for the impression of knowledge - research world around you and extrapolate it to God:
Motto:
"The one-sided monopole of the 'atheistic orthodox science' to-date, makes the humanity
poorer, divided, senseless and gloomy to the level which we see today around us. So it is
about the time to restore the richness, harmony, sense and excitement of living on the Earth,
by abolishing this monopole with the competitive development of new 'totaliztic science'."
The empirical life continually confirms to us,
that "passing the same path, but in both opposite
directions, always is the source of two different
sets of knowledge which mutually complement
each other". For example, if we stand on the
top of a mountain, while our eyes catch images
(light) arriving from the bottom of it, then our
view is different than when we stand on the
bottom of this mountain while our eyes catch
the view (light) arriving from the top of it. But
only the thorough watch in both these directions
provides us with a full understanding of the
entire situation with that mountain. Similarly,
if we look at the landscape through one end
of a telescope or binoculars, then whatever
we see is to differ drastically from what we
are to find out when looking at the same
landscape through the opposite end
of the same telescope or binoculars. But
only combining together our findings from
both these directions of looking, provides
us with a full and balanced knowledge of
work of these instruments.
The same happens even if we e.g. just walk
or drive "to", and then "from" a place - our
road in both directions also provides us with
a different knowledge, in spite that it is passing
through exactly the same trajectory (e.g. the
road "from" always subjectively "feels" as "shorter"
and as if we pass it "faster" than the road "to", also
during the road "from" we capture additional
details of the "other side" which we missed
during the road "to"). At outlets of some rivers
tourists and locals are entertained by extraordinarily
condensed "super-waves" that run "against the
current", means "from the sea" - as this is described
in item #D2 of the web page named
dipolar_gravity.htm.
But only seeing also the unusual "extended"
waves that run "with the flow" on fast rivers,
reveal to us that these "super-waves" are
outcomes of collision between the motion
of wave and motion of water - and that this
collision causes their "condensing". Similarly,
seeing the so-called "red shift" in the light of
stars that is "condensed" due to run "against
the gravity current" of heavy stars, only induces
wild speculations of some under-educated
scientists regarding "where this red colour
of light comes from". Only seeing also the
"blue shift" in the light coming from the blue
sky and "extended" by motion "with the gravity
current" of the Earth, reveals to some rational
thinking people that "the gravity is a dynamic
dipolar field" similar to a field formed by the air
at the entry to a fan. To summarise the above,
if one wants to gain a full and balanced
knowledge about consequences of a given
"pathway", then it is necessary to experience
this pathway in both directions.
In spite of these empirical findings that "only
travelling in both directions provides us with
the full and balanced knowledge", in every matter people
insist on going in only one direction. As an example
of that insisting, let us consider the "road to God".
In medieval times, the religion looked at everything
by "starting from God and extrapolating this onto
the surrounding reality", while it "burned on
stake" every person which tried to accumulate
an atheistic knowledge. In turn present-day
"atheistic science" does opposite, namely "looks
at everything starting from the surrounding reality
and extrapolating this onto God", while it
"burns on the stake" everyone who (like my
"totaliztic science") tries to show the world
from the prospective of God. Unfortunately,
due to limiting its investigations to just this
one approach, the science to-date arrives to the
erroneous conclusion that "God does NOT
exist". However, the empiric experience
reveals to us, that in order to gain the "complete and
balanced knowledge" it is necessary to learn about
the surrounding reality (and about God), by passing
the "road to knowledge" in both these directions, i.e.
by "placing ourselves in the situation of God and
extrapolating our analyses at the surrounding reality"
as well as by "atheistic researching the reality which
surrounds us and extrapolation our findings onto
God". In this way, these two approaches
mutually are to check and to complement
each other. In order to realise here the
benefits open for us due to such
"two-directional" approach, let us briefly compare
accomplishments of the
monopole of the atheistic orthodox science
to-date - means present official human science which
"researches only the surrounding reality while
the results tries to extrapolate onto God",
with the rich competitiveness of the newly
born totaliztic science - means the new
science which is based on the philosophy of
totalizm, and which "analyses everything after
placing itself in the position of God and extrapolating
God's prospective onto the surrounding reality".
(For definitions and more detailed descriptions of
both these sciences with opposite philosophical
foundations, see items #C1 to #C6 from the
abovementioned web page
telekinetics.htm.)
As I am documenting this with countless evidence
in a whole range of totaliztic publications, for
example in item #B1 from the web page named
changelings.htm,
or in subsection H10 from volume 4 of my newest
monograph [1/5],
such "world ruled by God" that results from research
of the "totaliztic science" must drastically differ from
the "world without God" that stems from the research
of the "atheistic orthodox science". For example, in
the "world without God" finding "bones of dinosaurs"
must mean that dinosaurs in fact lived on the Earth.
In turn in the "world governed by God" finding "bones
of dinosaurs" means only that God has some superior
goal in showing these bones to people - as this is
described in items #A1 and #E1 of the web page named
evolution.htm.
Thus God could "create" these "bones of dinosaurs"
in the same way as He created people and created
animals - in spite that dinosaurs did NOT need to live
on the Earth. In a similar way in the "world without
God" there is no place for "morality" nor "dreams",
nor even for the "higher feelings" like love, pity,
sorrow, etc. In other words, in order the humanity
accomplished the balanced picture of the universe,
reality must be simultaneously researched and
interpreted by two competitive sciences, namely
by the to-date "atheistic orthodox science" and by
the "totaliztic science" which is just being established
by the philosophy of totalizm. In turn results
of both these sciences should be taught simultaneously
in schools and officially disseminated amongst
people - as this is emphasized, amongst others,
in items #B1 and #G1 from my web page named
pajak_re_2017.htm.
This is because without such a parallel
learning from both these "roads to knowledge",
the picture of the universe is highly "biased",
deviated, and poor.
As I already explained it at the beginning of
this item, the competitive approach of the new
"totaliztic science" is NOT entirely new in every
its aspect. After all, it represents the approach
to research of the reality, which by past philosophers
was called a priori - means "from cause to effect".
In a highly limited edition it was practiced in
past by religions, while in the ancient times
it was even used by Jewish scholars - who
preserve the essence of it until today in the form
of "kabala". But the "totaliztic science" introduces
several new (highly creative) components to
this old approach. For example, it states that
the use in scientific research exclusively
one approach, i.e. the use exclusively either
"a priori" approach, or exclusively
"a posteriori" approach (i.e. the one
which climbs "from effect to cause" - means
the one which is exclusively used by present
"atheistic orthodox science") is a serious
epistemological error which leads to deviations
in the human knowledge. This is because,
in order the knowledge is complete and balanced,
it is necessary to use both these approaches
simultaneously. In other words, in
vital interest of the humanity lies the establishing
and running on the Earth as many as two competitive
sciences simultaneously, i.e. the continuation
of to-date "atheistic orthodox science" with its
exclusively "a posteriori" approach to research,
and the simultaneous establishing and running
a new "totaliztic science" which would be based on the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
and on the
formal scientific proof for the existence of God -
thus which would scientifically develop the
"a priori" approach to the same research -
as this "a priori" approach is represented
and illustrated already now in my publications,
e.g. in my newest
monograph [1/5].
Of course, many more such new and highly
creative elements were introduced to the "totaliztic
science" - only that their full description (and
illustration on examples) requires rather voluminous
publication, such as my newest
monograph [1/5].
Sadly, the monopole of "atheistic orthodox
science" is surely going to disallow for a
long time to come, both - the official establishing
and financing of the "totaliztic science", as well
as the official dissemination of findings of that
"totaliztic science". After all, the "atheistic
orthodox science", similarly like every other
monopolistic institution, gains significant
financial benefits and complacent life due
to its "monopole on knowledge" - which
benefits it does NOT want to share voluntarily
with anyone, while which complacent life
it does NOT want to loose by creating a
competition. Thus, for a long time to come
the totaliztic researchers, similarly like
Dr Jan Pająk -
the author of this web page, will be forced
to research the universe as "unemployed
scientists", and perhaps some of them
will be even skilfully deprived the right
for an "unemployment benefit" - thus
experiencing another manifestation of
the "curse of inventors" described in
item #B4.4 of the web page named
mozajski_uk.htm.
Because of this obstructing the free and
official disclosure of the findings of the "totaliztic
science", to balance own knowledge every
person should try to learn these findings
in his or her private capacity. After all,
when starting from the point of view that
God exists,
and being aware of the method of God
described in item #A2.2 above, rapidly
the world around us begins to look differently.
For example, everything that surrounds us
begins to be just a kind of "hologram" formed
by God to accomplish His superior goals - e.g.
to inspire people for creative searches and to
improve "morality". Thus, for example
looking at "skeletons of dinosaurs" we start to
know that these skeletons do NOT mean at all that
dinosaurs actually lived on the Earth - but
only mean that God wishes to inspire human
creative searchers by "fabricating" them.
Similarly, e.g. the so-called "red shift of lights
from stars" and "expansion of the universe",
do NOT certify at all for the "big bang", but
certify for the high complexity and refinement
of the laws of nature which God encoded into
the software of the universe - as this is explained
in item #D2 of the web page named
dipolar_gravity.htm.
In turn, when we realise all these, our lives again
become enriched with the deep sense of purpose
and with the understanding of direction - both of which
the humanity lost recently because of the "biased"
deformation of the knowledge due to the complacent
"monopole" of the present "atheistic orthodox science".
The topic of urgent need for establishing the "totaliztic
science" is extended in items #C1 to #C6 from the web page
telekinetics.htm
and in item #B1 from the web page
tornado.htm.
#A2.7.
Beware of "principle of the survival of most moral" (which can also be called
"principle of the extinction of most immoral intellects"), which God consistently,
although discreetly, implements on people:
Motto:
"If we would determine the most primary cause for each premature death, then it turns out
that it is the deafness to voice of own conscience (i.e. practicing of a form of immorality)."
No matter whether you are an individual person,
or just a whole institution (i.e. so-called "group
intellect"), the philosophy of totalizm has for
you a vital advice. Namely, if you wish to
protect yourself (and also your close ones)
from a premature death, then you listen to
the voice of your conscience, and also teach
your children and all people close to you how
to listen to the voice of their conscience.
Do so, because for the majority of so-called
"intellects" (i.e. for the majority of everything
that leads independent "life" and has conscience),
God consistently implements the principle of the
"survival of most moral" described in more details,
amongst others, in item #B1 of the web page named
changelings.htm
and in items #G1, #G3 and #G4 of the web page named
will.htm.
The work of this principle is such, that almost
all "intellects" which become deaf to the voice
of their conscience die prematurely. But it shocks
how many present people is unable to listen
to the voice of their conscience. Almost all
of them are designated "for the scythe" - it
is just a matter of time how soon this happen
to them. In turn, if you wish to test an adult
whether he or she listens to the voice of
conscience, then you should utilise for this
purpose consequences of the "unanimity
rule" described in more details in subsections
JA2.1, JA9 and JA13 from volume 6 of my newest
monograph [1/5]
(or use the child test, also based on this rule, and
described in caption under "Fig. #G1b (right)" from the web page named
cielcza_uk.htm).
This rule states, that "independently with which
moral criterion one would judge or measure a
given human behaviour, the outcome always
will be the same". Therefore, if the reader finds
e.g. in the Bible any definite judgement of some
human behaviour, then the exact equivalent of
this judgement will be whispered by the voice
of conscience to all people who still listen to their consciences.
Thus, if to a person that still is used to listen to
the voice of own conscience, someone suggests
e.g. to think or to imagine a sexual intercourse
between homosexuals, then the conscience of
such a person is to generate a feeling that corresponds
to the God's command expressed e.g. in the Biblical
"Leviticus", verse 18:22 - quote: "And you must
not lie down with a male the same as you lie down
with a woman. It is a detestable thing."
It is just for this reason, that the majority of people
used to listen to voice of their conscience are
unable to eat meals e.g. in restaurants in which
homosexuals e.g. are openly kissing each other -
as this is described in item #B4 from the web page
antichrist.htm.
But in people who become deaf to voices of
their conscience, a sight of active homosexuals
either does NOT induce any feelings, or induces
the same feelings as a sight of kissing boys and
girls. In turn, if to a person used to listen to the
voice of own conscience, someone suggests e.g.
the "murder", then the conscience of that person
is going to induce in him or her a feeling that is
an equivalent to the definitive command from God
documented e.g. in the Biblical "Exodus", verse
20:13 - quote: "You must not murder". (Notice that
both above verses are quoted from the "New World
Translation of the Holy Scriptures", Watch Tower
Bible, New York 1984. The reason is, that in some
other translations of the Bible, these verses may
NOT be translated so exactly. For example, in Biblical
times the same word "kill" was used both, for
describing a killing of animals and for a human
murder. But in abovementioned verse 20:13 this
word is used to describe murdering of people.
After all, God allows killing animals if the goal
of this killing is a justified use of their flesh for
satisfying a true human hunger.)
The principle of the "survival of most moral"
(which can also be named the principle
of "premature extinction of most immoral intellects")
stems directly from the goal for which God created
people and for which at present God wisely governs
over the humanity. This is because the God's goal
is the "pursue of knowledge" - as this is explained
in items #B1 and #B2 of the web page named
antichrist.htm.
It is also for the same goal that God was forced to
create people as imperfect as only possible without
causing a self-destruction of the humanity. But,
unfortunately, in order to be able to "pursue knowledge"
people must behave in a specific manner which in
present times is named with the term "moral" behaviour.
After all, without a moral behaviour there is NO progress
of knowledge nor technology - as this is emphasized
in item #A1 of this web page. Therefore God issued
to people in authorised (inspired) by Him holy books
(e.g. in the
Bible)
the list of moral requirements and commandments
which all humans must obey in their lives. In addition,
to every person God gave also a special sense organ
called conscience which links directly the mind
of that person with the mind of God and which discreetly
tells every person which behaviours are morally correct,
and which are morally incorrect. In turn, for the use of
e.g. atheists, wise God developed also a whole array
of objective so-called "indicators of moral
correctness" - such as "moral field", "moral
energy", "moral laws", "karma", etc. (for their brief
descriptions see items #C4.2 to #C4.7 from the web page
morals.htm).
Unfortunately, because of the in-born imperfection,
many people ignore these commandments from
holy books, whispers of conscience, indicators of
moral correctness, etc. Due to this, instead of behaving
morally, they behave immorally. In turn, such their
immoral behaviour holds back God in accomplishing
His goals and plans. Therefore, God discreetly eliminates
these immoral intellects from the life (i.e. quietly kills
them) - as this is explained in items #G1, #G3 and
#G4 from the web page named
will.htm
and item #B1 from the web page named
changelings.htm.
This string of premature deaths of such immoral
intellects (and thus survivals of only most moral ones)
forms the principle of the "survival of most moral"
summarised in this item. (For a complete
description of this principle I would recommend
to look at items #G1 to #G7 from the web page named
will.htm.)
However, God's actions during the implementation
of this principle of the "survival of most moral"
(and "extinction of the most immoral"), are obstructed
by a serious limitation. This limitation stems from
the fact, that if every person is sure of the consistent
work of this principle in real life, then rapidly all
people would start to blindly believe in God and
there would be NO atheists on the Earth. On the
other hand, people who blindly believe in God and
are highly religious, have a serious drawback, which
can be called the "paradox of believers".
Namely, typically they think, that they already know
everything that is worth knowing - thus they ignore
their duty to learn increasingly more about their
God and about the world which God created. This
in turn changes them into conservatives and
stagnation-makers. So not only that they do NOT
"pursue of knowledge", but even they actively
disrupt the pursue of knowledge - as this is explained
in more details in items #C3 and #A2 from the web page named
will.htm.
In fact, if the Earth is inhabited exclusively by people
blindly believing in God, then until today the humanity
probably would still live in caves and know no fire.
In addition, almost all religions (and thus almost all
religious people who blindly believe in God) with the
elapse of time gradually deviated the understanding
of God's commandments, interpreting these commandments
increasingly wrong and selectively. For example, the
greatest parts of holy books with God's commandments
(e.g. the greatest part of the Bible) express God's
requirements how people should coexist morally with
other people. In turn only a marginal part of these holy
books is devoted to maintenance of tradition of repetitive
reminding to people about the existence of God - through
e.g. communal prayers and masses, explanation of God's
powers, pay homage to God, worshiping God, etc.
However, almost all religions reversed these proportions
and the majority of their attention they devote to
worshiping God and prising God, while only a marginal
part of attention they devote to the moral coexistence
between people. As the result, the majority of religious people
who blindly believe in God, thinks that they fulfil all
God's requirements imposed onto them if they only
regularly go to church or temple and participate in
there in sessions of worshiping God and prising God.
In turn fulfilment of these most vital for God requirements
of everyday moral coexistence with other people, these
blindly believing people neglect or ignore completely.
So instead of living morally, the majority of religious
people only regularly praise God, while their everyday
lives typically are full of immoralities. Summarising the
above, because of the progressing with time departure
by religions from the understanding of God's intentions
passed to people in His requirements and commandments,
highly religious people who blindly believe in God actually
make impossible for God the implementation of the goal
for which He created people, i.e. make impossible the
"pursue of knowledge". So for the "pursue of knowledge",
God needs atheists on the Earth (or needs the presence
of people who practice the new "totaliztic science" - and
thus who know that the God’s goal is the "pursue of knowledge",
and thus they still "pursue of knowledge" in spite that they
are sure of the God's existence). Therefore, God cannot
openly and in a visible to everyone manner "kill those most
immoral intellects". This is because such an open killing would
deprive people of their "free will" and would cause that
everyone would be scared to ask inquisitive questions
which lie at foundations of the "pursue of knowledge".
After all, people who ask courageous questions frequently
are accused of "blasphemy" by various "Pharisees" - it
is in order to disclose the immorality of this type of
accusations that are against God's will and goals, that
Jesus was send to cross by priests who almost everything
were ready to call "blasphemy".
In order to balance the situation and cause that
both, immoral intellects get extinct, but atheists still are
propelling the "pursue of knowledge", wise God implements
on the Earth the principle of the "survival of most moral"
in a highly discreet, unspectacular, and unnoticeable
for people manner - as this is explained in items #G3
to #G5 from the abovementioned web page
will.htm.
Namely, God creates appearances, that also for
people supposedly acts the
Darwin's principle of the "survival of fittest"
and that supposedly "pays to be immoral",
and furthermore, when God consistently "kills these
most immoral", He always does it in a manner
which provides people with at least 3 different explanations -
described more exactly in item #C2 from the web page
tornado.htm.
In turn, for the use of these persons, which work
(and deserve) to learn the truth on this subject,
God allows this truth to be discovered, and
revealed to interested people, by someone
named Jan Pająk - means by a truth-chaser
with the professional life quite symbolic for
the turn of 20th to 21st century, i.e. restlessly
persecuted by his countrymen, unwanted in
his own country, chased to the "end of world",
continually criticised by professional scientists,
characterised by almost everything that induces
prejudices of other people (including name),
troubled by frequent losses of work, by
uncertainty of tomorrow, by unemployment (but
without qualifying for an unemployment benefit),
lack of funds for research, scarce resources,
coldness, health problems, etc. This is because
the wise God knows very well, that anyway,
almost no-one in the world will believe in truths
which were discovered privately and for free
by the hobbyist named Jan Pająk that
originates from the small Polish village
Wszewilki
(instead of being discovered at huge costs
and with the use of expensive satellites or
research facilities by a scientific celebrity
employed officially in Cambridge or in MIT
just for specialising in such research).
#A2.8.
If you notice a "group immorality" of the institution or community to which you belong,
do wisely everything in your power (but without compromising your security), to disclose
the harmfulness of it, as the passivity towards someone's immorality, God punishes
the same severely as a participation in this immorality:
Motto:
"If you remain 'passive' in the face of someone's immorality, then in the future
you will be punished in the same way as if you were a co-culprit in that immorality."
Empirical data that increasingly reveal themselves
in events that we see, show that a "passivity" towards
someone's immorality God punishes as severely as
the participation in that immorality. That principle
of punishing a passivity is described already in a
number of totaliztic web pages - e.g. see items
#B4 and #B1 from the web page named
parasitism.htm.
Therefore, if we see any form of immorality in
the group intellect to which we belong, then in our
interest lies that we wisely do everything in our
power, but in such a way that it will not expose
us to a danger or to a persecution, to disclose
the harmfulness of this immorality and in this way
to make our own contribution to the elimination of it.
In our, however, observance of that requirement
of God (to not remain passive in face of someone's
immorality), we have an obligation to take only such
actions which, according to our conscience and
to our knowledge, do NOT represent an "aggression",
and hence do NOT expose us to the danger or to
persecution from other people with whom we previously
lived in peace. The point is, that God does
NOT wish we combat one evil with the help of another
evil. However, if we are first who took (initiate)
an action against people with which previously we lived
in peace, while a consequence of this action would
be that it would expose us to a revenge, persecution,
danger, etc., from these people, then even if our action
would be used to curb someone's immorality, still
it would represent itself an "aggression", and as
such it would be an immoral action. Hence such
a prevention of someone's "malicious" activities
through the initiation of harming ourselves, is not at
all what the wise and righteous God demands from us.
For this reason, by "doing
everything in our power" to prevent someone's
immorality, one should understand the making
of prudent and well thought-over actions, which
do NOT represent an "aggression", and hence
they do NOT expose us to any form of receiving
returned suffering, persecution, dangers, etc.
(Please notice, however, that if this "group immorality"
that we have the duty to combat, is already itself an
aggression directed against us, then the situation
changes and we have then an "obligation to defend
ourselves" with the aid of all ways and means that
are available to us.) In other words, from experiencing
the full weight of the punishment from God for our
passivity towards someone's immorality, we will be
exempted already after taking any our prudent and
well thought-over deliberate actions, that at least in
a minimal way contribute to the reduction of the
"immorality" of someone's conduct (e.g. through
making other people aware of the harmfulness of
such a conduct). Of course, when God will serve
penalty for immortality of a given "group intellect"
to which we belong, then the level of our release
from suffering because of that penalty, will be proportional
to how much we contributed to eradication of given
"group immorality". The most clearly this "proportionality"
of the level of punishment can be seen in cataclysms -
e.g. see items #C7 and #I1 on the web page named
seismograph.htm.
This is because cataclysms always bring death only
to those most guilty, they bring rough treatment to those
slightly less guilty or those who did not display a full
passiveness, and they completely bypass the innocent
ones and those who significantly contributed to the
elimination of the "group immorality".
To the matter of our personal responsibility for immoral
actions of the group intellect to which we belong,
and also of the moral requirement imposed on us,
that in such cases we must NOT remain passive,
but should start an active effort to correct this
immorality, the philosophy of totalizm devotes
a lot of attention. For example, this topic is
addressed also in item #E2 from this web page,
as well as in item #N2 from the web page named
pajak_re_2017.htm.
In turn an example of the punishment which
was served to Germans for passivity in the
matter of immoralities committed by their group
intellect, which punishment after the end of
second world's war, amongst others, took the
form of killings of former (passive) Germans
by the secret organisation of Germans, is
discussed in item #E2 from the web page named
wszewilki_uk.htm.
#A2.9.
To those whom you love and respect tell the objective truth and well-balanced
constructive criticism, while praises and unconstructive compliments keep for the enemies:
Motto:
"Those who receive only compliments are deprived of chances to repair their mistakes."
Speaking the truth and constructive criticism
is difficult. After all, it climbs steeply
uphill in the "moral field" - as explained
in item #A2 from the web page named
prawda_uk.htm.
Thus the "truth" almost always turns out
to be unpleasant. Therefore, in recent
times the humanity adopted an immensely
damaging principle, that to the people
close to us only said is whatever they
want to hear, means sweet lies, praises,
compliments, etc. This rampant lately "fashion"
or a rule to never tell the truth, on the
West already has the name of "positive
reinforcement" - means supposedly the
"building of a character through telling
only things believed to be 'positive' ".
However, as it turns out, the consequences
of it actually "undermine", not "enhance"
or "reinforce". As a result of this ocean
of "sweet lies", the majority of people
today have lost their self-criticism, as
well as their ability to understand and
to repair of errors that they committed.
Therefore, no longer they are able to
improve their behaviour. After all, by not
receiving the information from other people
as to what they are doing wrong, they lost
the realism in the assessment of own conduct,
and therefore act increasingly more wrong.
For the above reasons totalizm points out
that the more you love and respect someone,
the greater is the obligation to speak
truth to him or her and to positively
identify errors that this someone commits.
After all - as it is explained in item #F1
from this web page, "without
learning the truth there is no progress".
But if the loving person does not explain
exactly to the loved and respected ones,
what they do wrong and what mistakes they
made, then in today's times they do not
receive such an information from anyone else.
In imposing on the totalizts the obligation
to criticise constructively and to objectively
indicate someone's errors, totalizm, however,
requires to do it the right way. Namely, it
requires that (a) the criticized people
are always informed that our criticism results
from the love and respect to them, and that
we want that through such a criticism they
learned to avoid making mistakes and mastered
the skill of repairing these errors which they
already committed. In addition, (b) the
criticism must be constructive. This means,
that it should be accompanied by so much additional
information as much we are able to communicate.
Especially it should reply to questions "why"
something was wrong, "how it can be repaired",
"how in the future one can avoid the repetition
of the same error", etc. Our criticism should
also be (c), well-balanced. That is,
the serving of it, if possible, should be balanced
by the equal amount of confirming what those of
our loved and respected ones do well and properly.
Totalizts typically "do not get into
anyone's way", and thus they do not have
a lot of enemies. After all, in their
lives they always act pedantically moral.
However, if they do have
an enemy, then they should keep for him or
her all the compliments and unconstructive
praising. After all, in this way they "hunt
up several birds with just a single stone."
#A2.10.
Rise your children accordingly to the "principle of reversals" commanded us by God,
remember also that the entire your life God continues upbringing you with the use of this principle:
Motto:
"Experiencing opposite of good, illustratively teaches us what is good."
On a number of totaliztic web pages is described
the principle used by God for upbringing people,
called the "principle of
reversals". Descriptions of it the
reader finds in item #B1.1 from the web page
antichrist.htm,
in item #B5.1 from the web page named
will.htm,
or in item #F3 from the totaliztic web page
wszewilki_uk.htm.
In the Bible this principle is commanded
by God to be used by people for upbringing
their children - although in there it does
NOT have so meaningful name. The work of
this principle boils down to the mobilizing
people to intensely work towards a change
of their situation, through placing them in
the situation, that what
"is", always seems to be "opposite" to
what "should be", what "we would like to be",
and what "God requires us to establish".
In other words, in order to teach people a
resourcefulness, place them in situation of
unavailability, to teach people softness, act
on them hard, etc.
The fact, that for the entire our lives God continually
is upbringing us with the use of this "principle of
reversals", introduces various consequences to
the perception of whatever affects us. For example,
if we are affected with something unpleasant,
then instead of being miserable, we should treat
our experience as a lesson of life from which we
can draw useful conclusions, and as an opportunity
to improve our character and our prospects for the
future. We also should NOT be ashamed of our
"black periods" from our lives, as they document
the richness of experiences that we already gathered.
* * *
In order to consistently implement this
"principle of reversals" on the Earth, God
is forced to use an array of tools, methods,
and ways of acting especially created or
developed for this purpose. I personally would
recommend to the reader to get familiar with
them. Their more comprehensive description is
provided in item #C6 from the web page named
god_exists.htm.
Some of these are also indicated in item #A1.1
above on this web page. After all, knowing them
allows us to understand better the behaviour of
our God, and also to react better in unpleasant
life situations in which frequently we find ourselves
just because of this God's "principle of reversals".
#A2.11.
Because every elementary action generates both
good and bad consequences, to each of your more
vital matter assign at least two different actions at
the same time, which you choose so skilfully, that
their "bad" effects will compensate each other:
Motto:
"If instead of a force that always induces resistance,
or instead of money that stimulate lusts, you use your
intelligence and the described here knowledge about
such merging together mechanisms that they mutually
compensate their bad consequences, then even the
most difficult among troubling you problems, with the
help of God can be solved without generating effects
that are undesirable e.g. for yourself."
Everyone probably knows the old Polish saying,
which expresses the timeless truth, namely that
"there is no such bad that
would NOT generate also some sort of good".
After all, this wise saying was copied from Polish
people by practically all the other nations, so that
in some way almost everyone come across it on
some occasion. However, not everyone knows
yet, that this saying has also the reversed version
which equally well works in real life, and which I
have already described on a number of my web
pages and publications (e.g. see item #F3 on my
web page named
wszewilki_uk.htm,
or see item #B3 on my other web page named
pajak_re_2017.htm).
This reversed version affirms a completely opposite
truth, namely that "There
is no such good that would NOT generate some sort
of evil". The perfect example of the action
of this opposite truth are consequences of the "good"
served when raising children from wealthy homes, or
from homes ruled by women - that is, children brought
up "without a father" - to which consequences I try to
draw the attention of the reader in a number of my web
pages (for examples see item #A3 on the web page named
god_proof.htm,
or item #B4 on the web page
antichrist.htm,
or even partially item #A2.10 from this web page).
In turn the empirical confirmation of the reliable
work of both these opposing truths in our physical
world, provides e.g. the fact, that absolutely
nothing has only advantages, but practically everything
has both, advantages and disadvantages, and
also provides the work of so-called "moral field",
the discovery of which was only possible after the
formulation of the philosophy of totalizm (i.e. provides
the work of "moral field", which on this web page briefly
described in items #H2, #B1 and #A1.1, while more thoroughly
which is discussed e.g. in tem #C4.2 from another web page named
morals.htm).
Also, thanks to totalizm, I have been able to discover,
define, and descriptively formulate a moral recommendation
explaining "how" we should proceed in our lives in the
situation of the simultaneous existence and action of
both of these truths, so that we do NOT generate
unnecessary evil. This item describes my recommendation,
which I hereby include in the collection of life-improving
recommendations of my philosophy of totalizm.
The recommendation which I intend to describe here,
I intuitively use since the beginning of my research
and creative activity. After all, numerous technical
implementations of various mechanisms that compensate
undesired consequences, as a small boy I was
analyzing in precise Swiss clocks that my father used
to repair, while I used to take apart again when my
father was at work. (I write more about this my youthful
behaviour in item #B1 from my autobiographical web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm.)
For example, it was just because of my intuitive use of
the principle from this recommendation, that I successfully
designed my invincible starship called the "Magnocraft" -
i.e. that I successfully designed my invention of the
interstellar spaceship, which the reader will find described
and perfectly illustrated starting from "Fig. #A2" of my web page named
magnocraft.htm.
The designing problem that needed to be solved in this
Magnocraft is arising because for the propelling purposes
this starship uses extremely powerful magnets, called
Oscillatory Chambers.
In turn each of these Oscillatory Chambers NOT only that
is capable to generate the desired propelling forces (i.e. to
generate "good") that propel this interstellar spaceship to
near-light velocity, but is also generates unwanted effects
(i.e. generates "bad" consequences), due to e.g. attracting
(or repelling) with enormous forces of any other Oscillatory
Chambers, as well as any nearby ferromagnetic objects.
In order to eliminate these "bad" effects, instead of using
just one Oscillatory Chamber, for propelling of the Magnocraft
"n+1" of such Oscillatory Chambers are used, and in addition
each of them produces a pulsating magnetic field with a special
course of its changes over time. As a result of this, the mutual
attraction of the Oscillatory Chambers occurring between one
main propulsor and "n" side propulsors of the Magnocraft,
is neutralized by the mutual repulsion between each other
of these "n" circularly positioned side propulsors. On the
other hand, the attraction of ferromagnetic objects through
all these Oscillatory Chambers is neutralized by the
repulsion of these objects by pulsations of the magnetic
field. (Note from physics, that the pulsating magnetic field
repels ferromagnetic objects, instead of attracting them.)
The use of exactly the same principle of neutralizing
undesirable effects allowed me also to invent a device
that would generate a magnetic field of an unlimited-power -
i.e. to invent that Oscillatory Chamber described in
more details on the web page named
oscillatory_chamber.htm.
After all, the electromagnets so-far invented by humans,
for the generating magnetic fields use the flow of current
in their coils of electrical conductor. However, this principle
introduces a very bad consequence in the form of the
bursting force that the generated magnetic field exerts
on the coils of own conductor. As a result of this bursting
force, the magnetic field strength of the existing electromagnets
could not rise above a certain value (which turns out to be
rather low), because these bursting forces are able to cause
a tearing and a destructive exploding of electromagnets' coils.
In contrast, in the Oscillatory Chamber of my invention,
these bursting forces are neutralized by the forces of
attraction that compress the chambers in an opposite
direction due to the mutual attraction of the electrical
charges accumulated on the opposing walls of these
chambers. Similar intuitive use of the principle discussed
here has also allowed me to eliminate the problems
(bad consequences) of several other my inventions.
Unfortunately, my previous use of this principle was
done in a completely intuitive way, without being aware
that it is a kind of essential law governing over our entire
physical world.
It was only when in January 2017 I formulated the
content of item #C9.1 from my web page named
ufo_proof.htm,
that I suddenly realized that the recommendation
I am trying to describe here is actually a kind of
essential law prevailing in the entire our physical
world, which (the law) is even respected by God Himself
in almost everything that God does. Hence, the first
formulation of this new recommendation of totalizm
I was firstly quoting as the "motto" for item #C9.1
from my web page named "ufo_proof.htm". At that
item I also provided a large collection of examples
of the use of that recommendation. However, after
further identification and rethinking as to how extensive
and useful are applications of this new recommendation
of totalizm, at the end of February 2017 I decided
that herewith in this item I am going to incorporate
that recommendation into the body of the entire
philosophy of totalizm, while the abbreviated
formulation of it I shall use as the title for this item.
If this new recommendation was to be expressed in
full, then the following words would describe it.
"Every elementary action
generated by any mechanism is going to introduce
both the beneficial (good) as well as undesirable
(bad) consequences. Therefore, in order to form
systems that generate mostly beneficial (good)
effects in our area of interest, it is always necessary
to combine together at least two such related mechanisms,
the unfavourable (bad) sequences of elementary actions
of which will compensate each other."
This new recommendation of totalizm has a huge
scope of applications. With its help it is possible to
solve not only technical problems (i.e. to eliminate
the "bad" consequences of different technical
mechanisms and actions), such as those eliminated
in my invention of the Magnocraft and the Oscillatory
Chamber. As it turns out, it is also indispensable,
for example, in economics, politics, science, and
even in various problems of interpersonal relations.
I will now review below examples of the use of
this recommendation in most important areas of
human life, to illustrate and to explain to the reader
how this recommendation can be, and sometimes
even already is intuitively, used to eliminate the
negative consequences of actions taken in practically
every area of our lives in the physical world.
1.
Technology. In the technology the principle of
eliminating bad consequences (evil) through the use of
the recommendation described here, is already applied most
often. The reason is that human-built mechanisms from
technical devices allow to quickly discover the nature of
the problems (evil) that spoil their work. So in order to
remedy these problems (evil), designers of next technical
devices add to their work additional mechanisms that
eliminate the problems (evil) of previously introduced
mechanisms. Probably the most commonly known
example of such a situation is the "differential" mechanism
in wheels of our cars. This mechanism was introduced
in cars to cause that when the car turns, the wheels on
both sides of the car can rotate at different speeds, so that
no wheel is forced to slide along the ground. Unfortunately,
on the slippery substrate this mechanism itself also
generates a "bad" consequence in the form of rotations
of only a sliding wheel. Hence, in off-road vehicles, an
additional mechanism has to be introduced that enables
the differential mechanism to be switched off when the
car is running on slippery surfaces. Of course, the
differential mechanism from cars is just one example
among thousands of different mechanisms used to
eliminate the undesirable (bad) effects of today's
technical devices.
2.
Politics. Politicians are chronic in using this principle
to avoid adverse consequences (e.g. losing elections)
in all their socially unacceptable moves. For example, whenever
they decide to impose a new tax, or raise an old one, or
legalize their negligence or corruption, at the same time
with a big bang they announce something supposedly
"good" that they have decided to do (but the date of the
initiation of this "good" is usually set for the times of a
next government). An excellent such example was the
news from the NZ government and NZ milk monopoly,
that I saw in television on the day
of writing this item, i.e. on 23rd of February 2017. The
NZ government announced then that it raised by more
than the double the number of deadly "Escherichia coli"
(E. coli) bacteria that is allowed to contaminate the waters
of New Zealand's rivers and lakes, as these bacteria leak
into these rivers and lakes from cow dung. (Previously,
the number was 260 bacteria E. coli per 100 ml of water,
while on that day it was raised to 540 bacteria per 100 ml
of water.) The point is that because of the highly careless
and harmful to nature actions of the NZ milk monopoly,
which provides cheap butter to almost half of today's world
(although in NZ the price of butter is one of the highest in
the world), the waters of the rivers in NZ have already been
so dangerously polluted with deadly micro-organisms, that
in a significant proportion of rivers and lakes no-one is allowed
to swim or bath any longer, while dogs typically die if they
accidentally drink this water. Of course, being so massively
present in NZ rivers and lakes, this murderous bacteria
sometimes gets into drinking water causing massive
poisoning of whole NZ towns (e.g. see
poisoning of water in NZ towns of Havelock North, Hastings and Flaxmere in 2016).
So in order to "cool down" the public outcry at politicians,
caused as a result of this change of already tragic
situation into the future one even worse, the government
announced simultaneously that by 2040 it would spend
two billion dollars to clean waters of the NZ rivers - see
www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1702/S00324/claims-of-lowered-water-standards-wrong.htm.
(The "trick" of the current NZ politicians and the government
boils down to the fact, that in the 2017 election the present
government most likely is to lose the power, while the next
governments (and future politicians) will only recognize
these deteriorating standards of bacterial river pollution, as
this will allow them to NOT do anything to rectify the problem,
while those next governments almost surely will still have no
money nor good will to respect the current government's
commitment to spend $2 billion on river cleaning in the future.)
As in the example above, corrupt governments and politicians
already in almost all of today's world use the same method
of announcing something that aggravates the fate of people
that they govern, with the simultaneous proclamation of a
promise that they will undertake in a distant future some
actions which are supposed to improve that fate (but which
actions these governments and politicians actually do NOT
intend to implement at all).
3.
Science. The problem (evil) with today's official science
which desperately holds up its monopoly on research and
on education, is that it so much has advanced its corruption
and its departure from the truth, that practically everything
new that this science officially states, is already a lie. (For
various examples of lies of today's official science - see
items #D4, #D2, #D2.1, #K1 and #K2 on my web page named
dipolar_gravity.htm,
item #B3 on my web page named
portfolio.htm,
item #E1.1 on my web page named
telepathy.htm,
item #B2 on my web page named
humanity.htm,
and also see other pages and items linked from there.)
Thus, in order to still be able to pretend that this official
and extremely costly science keeps discovering something
new, and at the same time to avoid becoming officially
caught up spreading lies that would compromise its hold
on maintaining the present monopoly on research and
on education, current professional researchers use the
recommendation described here. For example, they
announce that they supposedly have discovered something
new, but at the same time they locate this discovery where
no one of normal people, politicians, financiers, or decision
makers is able to verify the truth of this discovery (e.g. locate
it in the distant cosmos, in the depths of the ocean, underground,
in micro-world, in atoms, in micro-particles, in unknown to
people radiation, at "the beginning of times", etc., etc.) Of
course, the fact that their lies can also be exposed by their
colleagues (i.e. by other scientists) today's scientists do not
fear, because the present
drowning in corruption
and still monopolistic science has already developed
effective methods that allow it to crush in the bud all
attempts to unmask its lies - similarly as they have been
for nearly half a century crushing in the bud and blocking
my own attempts to reveal the truth (i.e. attempts crushed
and blocked, for example, by disseminating another lie,
that I am dealing only with "pseudoscience" and "conspiracy
theories" - to check how far away from truth is this another
lie of official science, I suggest to look at e.g. available in
#A0 from the web page named
dipolar_gravity.htm,
a shortened description of my
theory of everything called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity or "Codig",
or review the listed on the Polish web page
skorowidz.htm
and in section #A2.1 from the web page named
faq_pl.htm
examples of topics and problems that bother humanity,
the solution for which problems I already have found
due to my supposedly private and "pseudoscientific"
hobby research).
4.
Economics. Human nature tends to seek obtaining
a monopoly in whatever one does, and
then jealously maintain this monopoly. Hence, every
larger business uses all the forces and resources available
to it, to get the monopoly first, and then to hold it for own benefit.
This in turn leads to the rise of corruption among politicians
(or, more precisely, to rise of bribery), to price rises, to the decline
of quality, and ultimately to the collapse of the economic
branch dominated by a given monopoly. Hence, people
have discovered empirically that monopolies should be
vigorously combated. In today's world, they are prevailing
only in fallen countries inhabited by bribed and immoral
people and rulled by corrupted governments. On the other
hand, countries with rightful and moral citizens and
governments neutralize in themselves these evil-generating
monopolies (and cartels) at the source, by making sure
that in every economic realm there is a real competition,
which is the other mechanism eliminating the economic
evil generated by the trend to creating monopolies or cartels.
5.
Marriage monopoly. For many important reasons,
God so created women that their innate qualities lay
below the threshold level of stability - for details see
description from item #B2 of my web page named
antichrist.htm.
This is because God created women for living companions
of men, so that in the real life the instability of women was
compensated by the stability of their men - to which God
gave the role of "heads", masters, leaders, administrators,
etc. Thus, with their male counterparts in the role of "head",
women together with their men form stable units. Unfortunately, the Catholic
Church has destroyed this stable units by establishing laws
and traditions that a man is allowed to have only one wife.
This in turn causes that into the hands of unstable women
is given the "marriage monopoly". The monopoly in turn
allows that instead of "head" function being performed by
men, on the principles of various sexual and legal blackmail
and gradual corrupting, currently increasingly more women
are assuming the function of the "head", thus destabilizing
the men and the entire social life of our civilization - for
details see item #J2.2.2 from my web page named
morals.htm.
Therefore, the only way that the part of our civilization
practicing monogamy still has to restore the stability
which already is lost due to such "marriage monopoly
of women", is the return to "marital competition"
through the legal and official restoration of the right
to polygamy - i.e. the law that initially existed in the
described in Bible times, and hence it is NOT at all
contrary to the will and approval of God, but which
so unwisely has been undermined by the Catholic
Church which allegedly serves God. This legalization
of polygamy would replace the current "marriage monopoly"
by "marital competition". In turn it is known that even
the very potential (i.e. the possibility) of existence of
competition is often enough to stop the monopolistic
behaviour increasingly abused by today's women -
especially those from highly industrialized countries.
(How just a potential for marital competition affects people's
behaviour, everyone knows from times of engagement -
that is, from times when both sides were very willing
and tried hard because they knew that if they did not
meet certain requirements then they could be replaced
by someone else from the pool of easily available competition.
However, as soon as this period of engagement changes
its status to marriage, that willingness and hard trying
almost immediately disappear. This is because in monogamy
marriages each side knows that access to potential competition
is threatened by the power of marriage laws.) At the same
time, a possible legalization of polygamy, apart from the
change in relationship of one spouse to another (i.e. apart
of change in attitudes and possibilities), for the majority
of marriages would not change much. After all, most of
the marriages that truly and permanently love and respect
each other, thus that do NOT change attitudes towards
each other at the time when they marry, do NOT need to
try a polygamy, because a monogamy is enough for them.
Hence, after restoring rights to polygamy the majority of
life situations would look then as they look in present
times - only that the rolling down of a large proportion
of our civilization to instability would be stopped by this
one wise and morally-correct move. For example, the
infidelity would then stop exist almost completely, as
getting sexually involved with someone else would be linked
to the real danger of accepting the duty to marry him/her.
Unfortunately, it is unlucky for humanity that because of knowing how strong
power women currently hold, the probability that someone
before the just incoming collapse of our civilization will dare
to restore polygamy in the present monogamy countries, is
very low. In turn, when our present civilization is already
collapsed, and hence when a polygamy automatically raises
itself out of the lawlessness, rape and "rule of the fist" that
initially will prevail after the collapse of our civilisation, then
the fact that women will lose their "marriage monopoly"
will no longer protect humanity from a painful fall, hunger,
chaos, and destruction - which I described in items #H1 to #H3 of my web page named
prophecies.htm.
6.
Social life. If someone has a hospitable and friendly
nature, favourable living conditions, and an attractive place
of living, then also has many guests. Most of people, with
whom this person is in friendship, like to organize "invasions"
on his/her house and life, as frequently as they want to.
Unfortunately, these guests NOT only bring nice consequences,
but also many bad consequences. Hence, to neutralize
this evil, it is necessary to additionally introduce some
mechanism that restricts these "invaders" only to arriving
when there is actually an opportunity and a need. The most
commonly used of such additional mechanisms is to
impose some kind of hardship (e.g. to ask the guests for
physical help in some hard work, or to make for them an
awkward place to sleep, or to find an awkward day for a
visit, etc.).
7.
The elimination (killing) of the unproductive, prodigal, and
harmful group-intellects financed by taxpayers from taxes.
In item #E2 of this web page I explained that there are
two different types of so-called "intellects", the life of
which is subjected to governing by moral mechanisms.
These are: (a) individual intellects (i.e. single people)
and (b) group-intellects (i.e. businesses, institutions,
organizations, governments, countries, armies, religions, sciences,
etc.). In turn, if the life of any intellect is NOT prematurely
terminated, then after the birth, each of these intellects passes
through the following five periods or phases: (i) learning
and growth, (ii) production and addition of its contribution to the society,
(iii) errors and distortions, (iv) unproductiveness, wastefulness
and harming; (v) death and removal of harmful residues
from these intellects. (At this point, it is worth noting that,
unlike individual intellects, the death of group intellects
does NOT have to depend on their complete disappearance
from the surface of earth, but may depend on, for
example, a profound transformation of the goals of their
existence, principles on which they work, the composition
of their leadership, etc. For example, the death of the
former communist Poland occurred when Poland, as
a country, was transformed into the present capitalist
Poland. It is also worth to note that the transformation
of each of these periods or phases into a next one typically
occurs through a smooth increase and decrease, hence it is difficult
to note and define them, and there are no clearly defined boundaries
between them.) Since every intellect consists of imperfect
people in which the changes of attributes over time are governed
by similar mechanisms, each one among the above five
periods or phases typically lasts only for the same and
predetermined in advance number of years. So, for example,
the period (i) of learning and growth, for individual people
typically last around 20 years, while for group intellects
lasts around from one year, up to maximum a few years.
The period (ii) of production and adding its contribution to the society,
both for individuals and for group intellects typically lasts
only around 30 years. After production arrives the period
(iii) of errors and deviations, which in all intellects typically
lasts around 10 years. In this period, a given intellect begins
to overgrow in a variety of bad habits and deviated tendencies,
and also has already such "connections and influences", that
instead of producing or doing something for the good of society,
it begins to take care of almost exclusively of its private interests.
An excellent example of this period (iii) could be the situation
with the internet at the time of writing this sub-item in March
2017, when the internet began to be increasingly used to spy
on its users, to cheat, con, blackmail, lie, vilify, scare, bully,
humiliate people, etc. - instead to the purpose for which it
was originally created (i.e. instead of disseminating knowledge
and exchanging information). After the period (iii) of errors and
deviations, come period (iv) of the unproductiveness, waste,
and harming - that continues until period (v) of the death
of given intellect. In this period (iv) a given intellect typically
ceases to generate any product, and begins to waste virtually
all of its acquisitions that previously managed to gather.
In turn its habits and tendencies typically start to be so
distorted and bad, that this intellect begins to implement
goals that are exactly opposite to the goals for which it
was originally created. An excellent example of the group-intellect
from this period (iv) is the today's earthly official
science, described four sub-items above. After all,
instead of searching for, and propagating, the truth,
almost the only thing that it nowadays is looking and
caring for, are lies, and earning of its luminaries, while
to find and to develop these lies, and earnings, it spends
increasingly higher sums of money paid by taxpayers.
Fortunately, in a significant proportion of group intellects
that generate their own income which keeps them alive,
this period (iv) lasts short, because they quickly "die", i.e.
they are bankrupted or "eaten" by younger and economically
more and better acting competition. The problem, however,
is with the intellects that live at the expense of taxpayers.
These intellects, by themselves, that is, without the decision
of politicians that kills them, do NOT die, but they are trying
to live indefinitely long demanding ever greater amounts
of taxpayers’ money to sustain their unproductive and prodigal
life. After all, their management, and employees that they
gradually select and keep, are already accustomed to ever
higher wages, decreasing workload, and comfortable living.
So in order to kill them, typically a politician must have
the courage to make the decision that cuts them off
from the funding by taxpayers. Unfortunately, such a decision
is not easy to make, because these intellects, in spite that
in practice they for a long time have been unproductive, prodigal
and socially detrimental, nevertheless still know how to yell
loudly and devise thousands of reasons that deceive people,
why the taxpayer should continue to finance them. So the
politician who puts them to death risks, for example, losing
the next election, or being pushed away from politics. Hence,
in order to neutralize the evil that introduces the arrival to that
period (iv) of an increasing number of such group-intellects
financed by taxpayers, it is necessary to introduce some additional
mechanism, which is to compensate the evil consequences
resulting from their killing, for example, to introduce an impersonal
or automatic killing them after the expiry of these 30 years of period
(ii) of their productive life - i.e. without the need that a politician
is obliged to assume the responsibility for killing them. The
recommendation of totalizm described here indicates how
to develop and implement a number of such mechanisms.
For example, (A) at the time of creating a new group-intellect
funded by taxpayers, it can be determined in advance after
how many years it will automatically be eliminated (killed) -
note that this number of years should NOT be higher than 30.
Or instead of killing a given intellect, (B) a competition can be
created for it, while that competition either will cause it to
drastically transform into a different group-intellect already
operating on completely different principles, or else, e.g.
because of its unchangeable habits of unproductiveness,
waste and harm, the society itself will kill it (e.g. through
a financial "starving"). An example of just such a solution
through the establishment of a competition, is my suggestion
of endangering with killing, or with drastic transforming,
the nowadays already unproductive, deceptive, wasteful
and harmful official science, by establishing a
"competition" for the current official science in the form of
a new "totaliztic science" (i.e. the science which is new
and competitive to the old one, and which I described in
more details in items #C1 and #C6 from my web page named
telekinetics.htm).
Yet another way of neutralizing the ill effects of killing of such
group-intellects already in their period (iv) of life, would be that,
for example, instead of financing them by taxpayers, they may
be (C) re-qualified for voluntary contributions from human donations,
or (D) re-qualified for being financed from own income of these
intellects. (Both these changed funding rules would very soon
kill them - after all such intellects in the phase (iv) of their lives
are already too used to unprofessional, prodigal and destructive
behaviour.) Etc., etc. If one looks carefully around, then he/she
notices that there is already too much of such unprofitable, prodigal,
and harmful to people group-intellects financed by taxpayers.
Because they have mastered to perfection the art of telling everyone
that they are very needed and that they must be financed further,
no present politician will risk trying to kill them. Hence, in addition
to the corruption and waste by politicians and governments, most
of whom also have already entered their own period (iv), i.e.
alongside the political corruption and wastefulness described
e.g. in items #E1 to #E5 of the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2017.htm,
among others these already dying group-intellects force on
governments the rapid and continual increase in
immoral taxes (for
more information about the immorality of taxes see items
#T1 to #T5 from the web page named
humanity.htm),
and hence force also a rapid decline in the living standards
of today's inhabitants of practically every country. This is
because such group-intellects are like a horde of blood-sucking
monsters devouring the taxpayers, who can gradually suck
out all the "blood" and all the ability to achieve prosperity
and to lead a happy and peaceful life. It is therefore worthwhile
to put mental effort and knowledge of principles of the philosophy
of totalizm described here, to discover such non-inducing bad
consequences, and morally correct mechanisms and ways of
automatic killing of this ever-increasing pack of such highly
dangerous and harmful for the humanity tax-funded group-intellects.
Notice also, that if an individual person is employed as a
bureaucrat (office worker) for more than 10 years in the
same institution, then he/she typically begins to behave
like such "taxpayer funded group intellect" in (iv) phase
of its life. Therefore the employment of office workers
(including managers) in one and the same institution
should NOT exceed 10 years, after which they should
be made redundant.
Of course, in real life we may easily notice a whole
lot of examples of similar use of the recommendation
described in this item. But even when we analyze
only the examples provided above, we still will note
that the use of recommendation described here always
shows several characteristic features. So let's list now
the most important among these features. (1) With
the help of this recommendation, typically it is possible
to eliminate only one kind of consequences that are
"bad" for us, namely those on the elimination of
which in the given case we are most interested.
(2) The use of this recommendation does NOT
eliminate all the bad effects of whatever we do, especially
those that appear in different areas than we consider.
(3) Someone's use of this recommendation does
NOT prevent God from serving "absolute justice",
nor is blocking the action of moral mechanisms
and moral laws. (4) This recommendation is one
out of those tools that leave their users to choose
whether to use it to do good, or to do evil. (5) The
manner in which someone uses the recommendation
described here is also the subject to judgment and
the subsequent reward or punishment by God, in
accordance with the principles of "absolute justice"
served by God.
The situation from real life, for which we would
all like to use the discussed here recommendation
of totalizm, would be a possible attempt to avoid
the incoming soon mass extinction of mankind.
The scenario of this imminent annihilation of most
of the present humanity was published as long ago
as February 2009 in item #H3 from my web page named
prophecies.htm.
About this mass extinction is also warning viewers
the 35 minute long YouTube biographic film entitled
"Dr Jan Pająk portfolio".
If we look closely at what is going on around us, then it
turns out that my scenario of this extermination is gradually
being fulfilled exactly as I described it in there. By March
2017, when I wrote this item, almost one third of this scenario
was fulfilled. So only a very decisive action of all mankind
could stop this our stubborn pursuit towards a self-destruction.
However, in order such a decisive action could take place,
the humanity would need a kind of institution that would
perform the same function as "compasses" perform for
the wandering ships. Such an institution should be an
official science. Unfortunately, due to its current monopoly,
this science prefers to deal with matters that I have already
described previously, among others above in the sub-item
devoted to it. So in order to draw the human attention to
the truth and to rectify the period (iv) of errors and distortions
in which is currently the official science, it would be necessary
to use the recommendation described here - e.g. for
appointing formally a new "totaliztic science" which
is competitive towards the old official one, which through
undertaking of the education and dissemination of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity (Codig)
and the philosophy of totalizm, as well as which by
correcting the lies of the so-far monopolistic official science,
would restore truth, moderation, reasoning, and moral behaviour
to humanity so intensely pushed now towards a self-destruction
because of current distortions and the lack of sticking
to truth of the institution of official science which should
perform (but is NOT) the function of a righteous "compass".
#A3.
Further guidelines on the totaliztic acting in lives are indicated by the rest of totalizm:
This web page of limited size is aimed at
revealing only the essence of the philosophy
of totalizm, not on teaching entire this moral
philosophy. Therefore, in order to not extend
this web page, I am NOT going to list here
any more guidelines of the totaliztic acting
in our everyday life. After all, such guidelines
emerge by themselves - of someone learns
the work of moral mechanisms and principles
described by the philosophy of totalizm. Furthermore,
a whole array of such guidelines for totaliztic
acting in specific life situations is indicated
by various other my web pages and publications.
For example, another set of guidelines, similar
to the above, is briefly summarised e.g.
in items #C4.2 to #C4.7 from the web page named
morals.htm,
item #F1 from the web page named
rok_uk.htm,
or e.g. item #J1 from the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.
In turn, to a full extend these guidelines are explained
in textbooks of totalizm indicated in item #A4 below -
for examples see subsection A16 and NG6.4 in my newest
monograph [1/5].
#A4.
Manuals of totalizm:
Here are free of charge manuals of totalizm
available at present for downloading from
the Internet - listed in the order from a
newest one to the oldest (click on the
green description of the selected manual
to download it to your computer):
Newest: volumes 1, 6 to 8, 12 to 13 and 4 to 5 of monograph [1/5] in PDF,
Older: the entire illustrated monograph [8e/2] in PDF,
Still older: volumes 4 to 9 and 4 to 5 of monograph [1/4] in PDF,
Oldest: the entire illustrated monograph [8e] in PDF and
non-illustrated monograph [8e] w DOC and WP5.
While using textbooks and publications of
totalizm, it is worth to know that since
their illustrated versions in PDF format
were developed, their older non-illustrated
versions disseminated in WORD.DOC and
WORD_PERFECT.WP5 formats ceased to
be updated. But these older and already
non-updated versions were NOT removed
from Internet, so that interested readers still
are able to upload and review them. But if
someone is NOT interested in the history
and the evolution of given ideas, then while
downloading a given manual he or she should
rather seek the most recent one, means
illustrated and updated version of it in the
PDF format.
#A5.
Notice how to spell the name "totalizm":
Totalizm should not be confused with "totalitarianism".
Totalitarianism is a fascism-like immoral philosophy
which in almost every aspect is completely opposite
to totalizm. Unfortunately, for some very strange reasons,
a few years after the name "totalizm" described here
started to gradually disseminate throughout the world,
various anonymous individuals rapidly rushed to rename
"totalitarianism" onto a shorter name totalism.
Fortunately, the shorter name for the reactive philosophy
"totalism", these individuals usually wrote
with the letter s, i.e. NOT with the letter z -
which is used by the moral "totalizm" described here.
The interesting part of this strange
phenomenon is, that individuals who use the name "totalism"
in the meaning "totalitarianism" seem to overlook that
both these words have completely different meanings. The
word "totalitarianism" originates from the word "totalitarian",
which means an "aggressive stand of controlling and imposing".
In turn the word "totalism" originates from the word "total",
which means a "complete wholeness". Observing this
illogical fashion of naming "totalitarianism" with a completely
wrong word "totalism" some time after the name "totalizm"
was already introduced, one should ask the question, whether
this is just a fashion, or it hides something much more sinister,
which we should take notice of. After all, according to totalizm,
in the intelligent universe nothing happens without an important
reason.
#A6.
Logo of totalizm:
Totalizm has its own logo. This logo is used
for sealing (marking) everything that fulfils
principles of totalizm - e.g. see "Fig. #I1".
Because totalizm is the modern philosophy
of morality and fulfilment of moral
requirements, the logo of totalizm turns out
to be the symbol (seal) of morality
and obedience to moral requirements.
Here is how this logo looks like:
Fig. #A1. The logo of totalizm - means the symbol
(seal) of morality and obedience to moral requirements.
Totalizm is currently the most moral out of all modern,
human-formulated philosophies in existence on Earth.
(But notice that totalizm recognises the moral superiority of the
content of the Bible -
towards scientific explanation of which should strive the
findings of every human-formulated philosophy based
on empirical evidence and on logical deductions - see
the caption under "Fig. #L1ab" from the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.)
Everyone who willingly places this logo on his/her writing,
or who carries the logo of totalizm, has the moral duty
to maintain the pedantical obedience of own words,
attitudes and actions with the content of the Bible
and with scientific findings of the philosophy of totalizm.
(Of course, this moral duty is unable to scare fraudsters
of various kinds from abusing the logo of totalizm - similarly
like institutions which print money, as well as human laws,
are unable to prevent these money from being
counterfeited e.g. by criminals.)
Totalizm is a philosophy, which uses this distinct logo
shown above. This logo is of the shape of ellipsis, with
white and red symbols in it. It has an extremely unusual
history and quite a special interpretation, both of which
are comprehensively explained in the English monograph [8]
entitled
"Totalizm"
(an English-language copy of this monograph you can download
free of charge from almost all internet sites of totalizm,
the addresses of which you find either on the left margin
of this page, or if you ask any search engine to look for
the key word
totalizm).
Logo of totalizm displays many interesting attributes. For example,
it emits quite special, positive, and unique "configurational
vibrations", which can be perceived with tools of radiesthesia
(e.g. by a divining pendulum or by a divining rod). Some people
even claim, that it works for them as an amulet that brings
good luck in personal life. At the address
logototalizm.w.interia.pl
someone published anonymously an entire web page (in Polish),
in which he describes outcomes of his personal analyses and
research of this unusual logo - I recommend having a look at it.
You can find this logo on many internet web pages, which are
devoted to the moral, peaceful, positive and constructive philosophy of totalizm.
* * *
Notice that you can see the
enlargement of each illustration from this web
site, simply by clicking on this illustration. Most of the
Internet browsers that you may use, including also the popular
"Internet Explorer", allow to download
each illustration to your own computer, and then look at it,
reduce or enlarge the size of it, or print it, with your own
graphical software.
Part #B:
Origins of totalizm:
#B1.
What is totalizm:
Motto:
"Totalizm is a kind of symbolic 'white horse' which carries these people who ride on it
into a better future that guarantees more aware, more fulfilled, and more happy life."
Totalizm is a new, moral, peaceful, progressive,
and constructive philosophy that was developed
as recently as in 1985. Although several
comprehensive definitions of this philosophy
are provided in subsection JC1 from volume 7 of
monograph [1/5],
for the consistency of presentation we start
our descriptions from attempting to define
totalizm also here. However, providing a
single brief definition of this philosophy is
rather a difficult task. This is because,
depending on a point of view, the definition
must differ. So let us assume, that we wish
to define it from the point of view "what and
how totalizm does". Then the essence of
this philosophy could be expressed in the
following definition: 'moral totalizm
(spelled with "z") is a philosophy of everyday
living which allows us to accomplish a
number of desirable qualities of living such
as happiness, health, feeling of fulfilment,
peace of mind, satisfaction with what we
have, etc., through indicating to us several
very simple principles which it recommends
to obey in our lives, such as "everything that
you do you should do in a pedantically moral
way", "utilise every opportunity to increase
moral energy in yourself and in others",
"always choose the path which lifts you upward
in the moral field along the line of the highest
intellectual resistance", etc.'
Although totalizm calls itself a "philosophy", actually
it is more related to strict sciences such as physics,
mechanics, or computing. This is because it utilises
new phenomena of nature that it discovered and
described, such as moral field, moral energy, moral
laws, etc., to define with their assistance the most
productive principle of our conduct and most beneficial
principles of our living. These newly discovered phenomena
which totalizm utilises, are explained in more details in
subsection JA13 from volume 6 of monograph [1/5]. But in order
to make the above definition understandable already here,
we explain them now in other words.
Totalizm is founded on the finding of the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity stating that all our accomplishments
are governed by appropriate energies and by
configurations of appropriate fields. Thus, all qualities
highly sought and mostly appreciated in our lives, such as
our creative capabilities, accomplishments, happiness, health,
peace of mind, self-fulfilment, respect of others, and many
more, we must "buy" through paying for them with a special
form of energy called "moral energy". This energy allows
us to "buy" practically everything that we wish to have or
accomplish in our lives. Means, whenever we feel happy,
experience pleasure, accomplish or do anything in our life,
etc., it always boils down to the consumption of a portion
of our moral energy - similarly like in physics all types
of work consume physical energy. Of course, in order to be
able to "buy" ourselves anything with this moral energy,
we firstly must accumulate it. Because the "moral energy"
is simply a form of energy which we accumulate while we
climb upward in the "moral field", practically we acquire
it by completing in our lives actions that lift us upward
in this moral field. The "moral field" is very similar to
gravity field, except that instead of acting upon masses
it acts upon intellects - for more details see items #H2
and #A1.1 of this web page. It causes that every our action
has a definite moral polarity, means it is either "immoral"
because it slides us downward in this field, or is "moral"
because it lifts us upward in this field. So an increase
of our "moral energy" totalizm compares to an increase of
potential energy in physics. Namely, it states that we
need to put knowledge and effort into practically every
our action in order to make this action to lift us upward
in this moral field. (If we do not put knowledge and effort
into our actions, they may accidentally slide us down in
the moral field, instead of lifting us up.) In turn this
climbing upward in the moral field is accomplished if we
obey so-called "moral laws". Thus, the only recommendation
of totalizm for everyday living states that "whatever you
do always pedantically obey moral laws". In this recommendation
totalizm closely copies physical sciences. After all,
physical sciences also state, that in order to accomplish
anything in your life, you need to obey laws of nature
in everything that you are doing. So the only skill that
one needs to master in order to apply totalizm in his or
her everyday life, is to learn what these moral laws are,
and how to obey them. In turn by learning this, one learns
the way of a continuous increase of all one’s capabilities,
potentials, and desired qualities of life, which stem from
the amount of moral energy that one managed to gather and
is able to spend for accomplishing goals that he or she
desires. Several simple rules, which totalizm teaches us,
unlock our access to countless benefits that the conversion
of moral energy into our accomplishments can bring to us,
and that are listed in subsection JA2.4 from volume 6 of
monograph [1/5].
#B2.
The scientific foundations of totalizm, means the
theory of everything
called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity:
Totalizm is the only philosophy on Earth, which
was not invented, but derived. It was
derived in a similar manner as mathematicians
derive new equations, and physicists derive new
laws of physics. Actually everything started from
a new scientific theory, which describes the way
how gravity field operates. This theory I developed
in 1985 and named it the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
(You may seek more details about this theory
via search engines, using its name as key words.
It is well explained on the film linked in item #J9
of this web page, and also described on various
web sites, e.g. about telekinesis
(telekinesis.htm),
or about telepathy
(telepathy.htm),
while the significance and influence of it on our
understanding of the universe around us, are
explained e.g. in item #J5 of the web page
wszewilki_jutra_uk.htm
or in item #B2 of the web page
malbork_uk.htm.)
After I finished developing this theory, it turned out,
that from just an ordinary scientific theory, which only
supposed to explain how gravity field works, it turned
out to be the
theory of everything
that was searched for so long. It seems to provide answers
to practically all questions that humans may have. In order
to give you some idea, as to how wide range of questions
this theory answers, look at the list of key words and
key phrases contained in the philosophy of totalizm.
Amongst other questions, the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
also answered these very old ones (by the orthodox
science to-date considered to be unanswerable), e.g.
whether we have
souls and spirits,
whether
nirvana does exist,
whether
God does exist,
whether
this "other world" does exist,
how our brain operates and why we sometimes
remember things that happened before we were born, how
telekinesis,
telepathy,
and acupuncture works,
what is radiesthesia, what is energy, what is time,
how to build time vehicles,
how to accomplish immortality and live forever,
and many more.
One of many new ideas that this theory initiated,
was the philosophy of totalizm. Actually this "theory
of everything" called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
provided the complete theoretical foundations for
the philosophy of totalizm, because it revealed and
explained regularities, which exist inscribed permanently
into the surrounding reality, and which with an iron
hand rule over our everyday lives. I only am the scientist
who as the first in the world wrote down the descriptions
of these regularities in a textbook of totalizm, and then
published these textbooks for the use of interested people.
I should add here that since my Concept of Dipolar Gravity
allowed me to gradually deduce the truth about a software-controlled
design and operation of the universe, and then explain to
other people this truth on totaliztic web pages and publications,
my attention several times have been directed to the phenomenon
of "adopting" by some other researchers of a number of conclusions
to which I arrived, but without mentioning that they originate from
my publications. This is a rather highly immoral conduct, because
onto all my web pages and publications are superimposed copyright
reservations, which clearly demand mentioning by the persons using
my ideas where they scooped from these findings and conclusions
that are derived from my research. Fortunately for future seekers
of the truth about the historical primacy of discoveries and intellectual
ownership of ideas presented on the totaliztic web pages, to the
conclusions to which I arrived one cannot come without the prior
knowledge of the described by my
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
the software-controlled design and operation of the universe (i.e. the
design and operation based on the existence of "counter-matter" with
the characteristics of a "liquid computer"). Therefore, those persons
who choose to immorally "adopt" my ideas and present them as their
own, still are unable to demonstrate how these ideas come to them,
as these ideas cannot be worked alone without previous knowledge
of what states my Concept of Dipolar Gravity. Meanwhile, it was me
who developed this concept as the first scientist in the world. Hence,
it was also me who received from God the privilege to develop as the
first scientist in the world of those revolutionary new ideas which result
directly from this concept.
#B3.
How the Concept of Dipolar Gravity explains the work of moral laws:
Let us consider what happens when you hit a key in your computer.
Well, briefly speaking the hardware of your computer sends a
control signal to the appropriate program in your computer. The
program begins the service for this particular key. It converts
the control signal into a command for a specific action of the computer.
The command is send back to hardware, which executes it. So practically
whatever happens in your computer after you hit any selected key, it
always depend on a program contained in the computer's memory.
According to the Concept of Dipolar Gravity exactly the same
happens when you are doing any physical action in your life.
This is because our universe is actually build like a typical
computer. Namely it has the hardware part contained in our world.
It also has the software part (or programs) contained at the other
end of dipolar gravitational field in a separate intelligent world
called the counter-world. Every single your physical
action carried out in our physical world sends appropriate control
signal to this another software world, or counter-world. In the
counter-world this signal (which describes your action) is processed
by special natural programs, which totalizm calls
moral laws.
Moral laws work out what should be the response of the
counter-world to a given action. Then it prepares this
response and sends it back to our world in the form
of special natural commands (small programs) which totalizm calls
karma.
After arriving to our physical world, these commands are executed,
giving appropriate response from the environment to our initial actions.
The important attribute which the above mechanism
of morality reveals, is that whatever we do in our life,
it brings responses which are not random at all.
Actually all responses of the environment to
our actions are following a set of very strict rules
or algorithms, by totalizm called "moral laws".
Moral laws are like laws of physics - only that
they define what moral consequences of our
actions are to be. The existence of moral laws
practically means that in our behaviour we must
start to learn and respect the action of these laws.
If we do not know about them, we are not able to
obey them, therefore we are severely punished
for breaking them. Furthermore, we are unable
to earn rewards given to people who obey these
laws. More about moral laws, our world, and
counter-world is described in volume 5 of English
monograph [1/5] - have a look at it (it is for free
and you can download it via this web site).
#B4.
The intelligent counter-world:
Before I proceed with further explanations
regarding totalizm, I firstly need to provide
more details regarding this mysterious
"counter-world", which contains the software
part of our universe, thus in which the moral
field is formed and the operation of moral laws is executed. We actually
hear about this counter-world from religions, except that
being formed thousands of years ago, religions are unable to explain it with
present terminology. Religions call the counter-world with different names,
e.g. as this "other world" or "world of souls and spirits". It is this counter-world
where our souls are kept and where we go after our death. Fortunately for us, the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
can already explain much more about this other
world. This concept proves that the gravity field is actually a dipolar dynamic
field, quite similar to magnetic field, meaning a field that has two poles: an
inlet "I" and outlet "O". But because gravity field is concentric, in our world
we can only see the inlet "I" pole. The second pole "O" of gravity disappears
from our world and appears in a different world that is parallel to ours one.
This other "counter-world" is also filled out with a substance. It is named
"counter-matter". The substance "counter-matter" forms in the counter-world
exact duplicates of objects existing in our world. In fact, every object that
exists in our world, in this counter-world has an exact replica of itself. For
totalizm this exact replica of our physical bodies contained in the counter-world
carries a very special significance. Totalizm calls this replica a counter-body.
(Religions call it a "phantom" or a "soul", while the so-called "alternative
sciences" usually refer to it as to "astral body", "energy body", "aura", etc.)
The substance "counter-matter",
which prevails in this parallel counter-world, as well as all objects formed from it,
have exactly opposite properties to our "matter". For example, our matter displays
mass, inertia, and friction, so counter-matter is weightless, has no inertia,
and produces no friction. But the most important are intellectual attributes
of our matter and this counter-matter. Namely our matter is "stupid" in
the natural state, while counter-matter is opposite to stupid, means "intelligent".
This practically means that the entire counter-matter which prevails in the counter-world
displays all properties which we know as carriers of intelligence. For example
counter-matter can gather information, store or memorise information, retrieve
information, and think. Practically this means that the counter-world is like
one huge computer. It can create computer-like programs, and it also can run
these programs. One type of programs that are created and stored in the
counter-world are these algorithms of various laws of nature, including
algorithms of moral laws. Of course, there is a wealth of evidence that the
counter-world does exist and that it is intelligent. Several examples of
this evidence are discussed on the totaliztic web site
telekinesis.htm.
Further descriptions of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
including evidence and formal proof for
the existence of intelligent counter world,
are provided in volumes 4 and 5 of newest
monograph [1/5] (available in English and
Polish) "Advanced Magnetic Devices", and
in volumes 4 and 5 of an older monograph
[8/2] "Totalizm" - both these publications are
available free of charge via this web site.
Because it does not take a lot of time to
review these two volumes, while they open
our eyes to many phenomena which
previously remained unexplained for
the orthodox science, I am inviting you
to have a look at them.
Motto:
"According to totalizm we live in God, according to religions God lives in us."
As it is explained in the previous item of this
web page, in the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
the name "counter-matter" is assigned to the
intelligent substance that prevails in this other
parallel world, called the counter-world.
The most extraordinary attribute of this substance from the counter-world is that
it is intelligent in its natural state. This means that it is able to think
like a huge computer. For example, the so-called ESP, or cases of receiving
replies to inquiries via divining pendulums, are actually manifestations
of communication between humans and this thinking substance. The shocking
consequence of the entire other world being filled up with such thinking
substance is, that actually this intelligent other world is what religions
call God. Thus the Concept of Dipolar Gravity is the first fully scientific
theory which is able to
prove formally that God does exist.
This formal scientific proof for the
existence of God is published in
subsection I3.3 from volume 5 of English
monograph [1/5], and also in subsection
K3.3 from volume 6 of English monograph
[8]. It is also explained on two totaliztic web
pages, namely
god.htm, and
god_proof.htm.
The philosophy of totalizm accepts this
formal proof for the existence of God and
considers it in all the deductions that it
undertakes.
Although the philosophy of totalizm of
a fully secular way of living, the formal proof for the existence of God
has an important meaning for it. The point is that because God conclusively
does exist, the totalizm can rely in all statements on the purposeful and
intelligent construction of the universe and course of events around us.
After all, the intelligent God must construct and run the universe in
an intelligent manner. In turn the intelligent structure and operation
of the universe, causes that everything must have a clear purpose, meaning,
structure, predefined operation, allows to carry out effective deductions
with the use of scientific methodologies, etc. This in turn allows to find
recipes for happy and fulfilled lives, purpose of our living, principles
behind every phenomena, etc.
Part #C:
How to practice totalizm:
#C1.
The single principle of totalizm:
Totalizm is a very simple philosophy. It has
only a single rule, or principle, which it asks
to follow in everything that we are doing.
This single rule of totalizm states:
whatever you do,
always do it pedantically morally
(i.e. by obeying all moral laws). Of course,
in order to follow this simple rule, people
firstly need to know that moral laws
do exist, and then they must also know what
moral laws actually state. So in order to apply
totalizm in our lives, some way of learning
ther conent of moral laws is needed, for example
by study the description of these moral laws,
which is presented in subsection I4.1.1 from
volume 5 of English monograph [1/5]. Then
also is needed the will to implement these
laws in everything that we are doing.
As it turns out,
God designed men
in such a manner, that people have also the
chance to obey moral laws even when they
do not know what specifically these laws state.
Totalizm teaches, that there are two manners
of accomplishing the obedience of moral laws,
namely intuitive and cognitive. The first "intuitive"
manner of obeying moral laws without actual
learning them, simply depends on listening to
our counter-organ of conscience.
As it turns out, our conscience exactly knows
which our actions are agreeable with moral laws,
and which run against these laws. There is
even a simple version of totalizm called the
intuitive totalizm, which allows to obey
moral laws by simply listening to our counter-organ
of conscience. Actually there is a lot of intuitive
totalizts around us, and we can see them in
action if we look carefully around (they usually
do not know though, that they belong to the
group of followers of totalizm).
The second "cognitive" principle of
obeying moral laws depends on being fully
aware that these laws do exist, and on trying
to obey them in an intentional manner. The
version of totalizm which obeys moral laws
in such an intentional manner is called the
formal totalizm. Depending on the
totaliztic experience and knowledge of a
given practitioner, this cognitive manner
of obeying moral laws has two levels of
implementation. The first of these is used
by initial totalizts, who still have no experience
in learning and obeying all moral laws. It
depends on the knowledge of
"moral field" -
or more strictly on the skill of fast recognizing
in every life situation the direction in which this
moral field climbs upward, and then going in
this direction. ("Moral field" is described in
items #H2, #A1.1 and #D1 of this web poage.) In turn
the second level of implementation is used by
more experienced totalizts. It is based upon
the knowledge of work of "moral laws". Let
us discuss each of these levels separately.
The cognitive manner of obeying moral laws
is implemented in the first stage of learning totalizm,
i.e. still without actually knowing specifically what
each one of these laws states. It is based upon learning
the direction in which moral field climbs upward. If
we know in which direction moral field climbs upward,
then according to totalizm all that we need to do
in life, is to simply always move upward in this field.
This moving upward depends on doing everything in our
lives in such a manner, that it always lifts us higher in this
moral field. In turn the direction in which the moral field runs
upwards is indicated by the so-called line of the highest
intellectual effort. (You probably heard of the "line of
the least resistance" - for example water that flows downhill
always follows such a line. Well the "line of the highest effort"
runs in the direction that is exactly opposite from the line
of the least resistance.) According to totalizm, whatever we do,
it always moves us within the three-dimensional moral space.
This space is composed of three dimensions (or coordinates/axes)
like our physical space. Only that instead of height, depth,
and width, it has different three coordinates, namely:
intellectual (or moral), emotional, and physical - see
"Fig. #I1" from my webs page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.
For example, if someone offended us, we could choose amongst
3 responses, namely: (1) hit this person, (2) collapse on the floor,
or (3) recall and tell everyone a nasty secret that we know
about this person. If we hit this person, we would act
along the line of the least emotional resistance. If we
collapse on the floor, we would act along the line of the
least physical resistance. But if we recall and tell everyone
a nasty secret about this person, we would act along the line of the
least intellectual (and moral) resistance. Well, the line of the highest intellectual
effort runs exactly opposite to the line of the least intellectual resistance.
So the action that totalizm would recommend for such a situation,
is to do something that is exactly opposite to this line of the
least intellectual resistance. Practically this would boil down to
inventing intellectually something that we would need to say
to calm down the offender and ourselves (of course, what this
something would be, this depends on the situation). And such an
action would be what totalizm requires in order to climb upwards
in the moral field during solving the situation described above.
Well, to explain clearly all the above in such a brief
paragraph is quite difficult task. So perhaps it would
be better to look at volume 6 of English monograph [1/5], where
all the above is explained gradually, step-by-step, with the
use of numerous examples. Have a beneficial reading, and
hopefully welcome to the fast growing family of people
who practice formal (cognitive) totalizm!
The highest level of implementation of totalizm
depends on learning the operation of all known
moral laws, and on practical learning how to
obey these moral laws in our everyday life.
This level can be accomplished only by those
more devoted to the idea of totalizm.
#C2.
Totalizm is like a science of everyday living:
With human philosophies
is a bit like with our lungs: we all have them
and all use them continually, although only some of us realize that they
exist and are essential to our lives. Similarly every person must have
his or her own philosophy, only that most of people do not realise what
principles their own philosophy has. So they live on impulses, habits, and intuition.
Well, totalizm puts a structure onto all this. It indicates moral laws
and explains how to obey them. If one obeys these moral laws, then
his or her life is happy and satisfying. If one breaks these moral laws,
then his or her life is miserable and full of suffering. After all, moral
laws are very heavy-handed and no-one is allowed to fool with them.
Of course, when one accepts the existence of moral laws, then in order
to obey them one must act like physicists - i.e. must apply the science
of totalizm to everyday activities.
#C3.
How to practice totalizm:
Totalizm can be practiced on two ways,
namely (1) intuitively, and (2) cognitively.
The intuitive practicing is the most simple.
It just depends on careful listening to the
voice of our conscience, and then on doing
in our lives only these things that are approved
by our conscience. This is because the
conscience knows perfectly well what is
moral and what is not moral.
Also practicing cognitive totalizm is rather simple.
It includes: (1) learning principles, (2) understanding
moral laws
and mechanisms of their action, and (3) implementing
them in life. Because the only rule of totalizm requires
us to "pedantically obey moral laws in everything that
we are doing", the starting point of practicing totalizm
is to learn what moral laws are all about. This learning
takes only around one weekend, because it requires reading a textbook
on totalizm (i.e. reading volumes 6 to 8 from [1/5], or volumes 1
to 3 from [8/2]). Slightly more hard is to understand mechanisms of
moral laws. This is because it requires time to think about
these laws and think how they work. (The knowledge of laws of physics
is very helpful, although not all of us are good in physics.)
Finally, the implementation of totalizm simply depends on learning
or developing various techniques of solving everyday situations
so as to obey (instead of breaking) moral laws with every our action.
Notice that totalizm is a fully
secular philosophy. In spite that it naturally contributed to the
development of scientific proof for the actual existence of God,
it states that "life is about
living and about fulfilling the purpose for which we are send to Earth".
So it does not require spectacular and public manifestations of the
obedience to God, religious poses and gestures, etc. (although it
also does not disapproves them). The only form of public manifestations
of the obedience to God that totalizm promotes, depends on the
pedantic fulfilment of moral laws. The reason is that the
requirement to obey moral laws can be proven scientifically.
In turn the requirement to do any other public displays of
faith or obedience cannot be proven scientifically.
#C4.
Benefits of practicing totalizm:
With practicing totalizm is like with every
other moral activities: the more you
put into it, the more benefits you get back. (For example consider body building:
the more exercises you put into them, the more effects you are going to reap.)
Therefore benefits that one reaps after starting to practice totalizm are to differ
depending on the level of this practice. For example just knowing principles of totalizm,
without actually practicing them, is to only make more understandable everything that
happens around us. If one practices intuitive totalizm, basing the obedience of moral
laws on the whispers of the conscience, sometimes gets things right, sometimes not.
So benefits usually include only a basic improvement in the level of happiness
and in general health. In turn, if someone practices totalizm to a full extend,
benefits may include even reaching such extraordinary experience as nirvana
described on my web pages named
nirvana.htm.
In general practicing totalizm always increases
our personal happiness, peace of mind, self-fulfilment, sense of security, sense
of purpose, feeling of being in control of our matters, understanding of the world
around us, and general health (both mental and physical). Actually the
difference in how one feels before and after accepting totalizm is enormous.
I personally perceived it like a difference between finding myself in the
middle of a huge ocean in two extreme situations. Before I practiced totalizm
I felt like a straw tossed around in a huge ocean at darkness. Waves of
life tossed me around, I constantly struggled to survive, I could not
see anything on the horizon,
and I could not work out any sense in what happened around me. In turn after
I began practicing totalizm I felt like on the same ocean, but this time
in a boat and during daylight. Although I was still tossed around by
waves of life and I still needed struggle to survive, the boat gave
me the protection required. I could see what
happens around. I could see the purpose in what happens, and I started
to see an island on the horizon towards which I was moving. I am quite
sure that totalizm may turn your own life in a similar manner. Actually
other totalizts always report that you start feeling the huge difference
immediately after you finish reading carefully the first volume of
totalizm textbook
(i.e. the volume 6 in English monograph [1/5], or volume 1 in English monograph [8/2]).
Motto:
Totalizm teaches that we should support only these ideas and people who require that we live for them morally, happily, long, and peacefully,
while we should oppose all ideas and people who require that we fight and die for them."
Totalizm has in itself a potential to make
happy all people. After all, in order to
be happy, we need to actively earn happiness
for ourselves. The happiness is NOT
accomplished by accident, but we need to
skilfully and systematically work for it (through
intentional lifting the level of our moral energy).
In turn totalizm indicates proven in action
methods of such intentional earning of our own
happiness. Unfortunately, as so far totalizm
is a discipline of knowledge, not an institution.
As such a discipline of knowledge, it can be
practiced only voluntarily, means only by
some individual people. So now only selected
people are able to build with it their own
sense of happiness. On the other hand,
the access to happiness should be open
for all people. Therefore totalizm, and its
proven in action methods of building happiness
for ourselves, should be implemented in
the public life. But it cannot implement itself.
After all, everything on the Earth is currently
saturated with an exact opposite of totalizm,
means with the
philosophy of parasitism.
Therefore, if we wish to implement ideas of totalizm
also in the public life - thus causing that the entire
society gains an access to a happy life, it is necessary
to establish for this a special institution, means a
political
party of totalizm
which would take on itself the political implementation
of totalizm. The most vital goal of such a political
party of totalizm would be the
maximisation of happiness
of the inhabitants of the country in which this party
acts. This party of totalizm, and also its ideology,
goals, and methods of acting, which would make
possible for such a party to open happiness for
every citizen, are described more comprehensively
on the separate web page named
partia_totalizmu_uk.htm.
Of course, the formation of a political party of
totalizm is NOT going to be easy. After all, totalizm
still has more enemies than followers. Therefore
before this formation is possible it is worth to
start various initiatives aimed at implementation
of totalizm in the public life - of the kind described
on the web page named
pajak_re_2017.htm.
Part #D:
Significance of "moral energy" in totalizm:
#D1.
Moral field, moral laws, and moral energy - means three fundamental quantities
which convert philosophy of totalizm into a strict scientific discipline similar to physics:
All philosophies that so-far were developed
on the Earth are "talkative" creations. Means,
their authors claimed something verbally, that
could be taken on word or rejected, but that
could NOT be measured nor scientifically proven.
But with totalizm is completely different. Although
it specialises in the subject area which previously
was reserved for philosophies and for religions,
in fact it is more similar to physics than to philosophy.
For example, totalizm introduces to the use
three fundamental quantities, such as "moral
field", "moral laws", and "moral energy", the
existence of which can be objectively proven,
while the values of which can be scientifically
measured. Thus totalizm ceases to be
just a "talkative" philosophy, and begins to be
a precise scientific tool which gives to us unambiguous
answers as to how we should lead our lives
to accomplish all qualities of life that are
precious for us.
Out of these three fundamental quantities of totalizm,
the most important is the "moral
field". Next to gravity, the moral field is
in fact the second primary field of the entire physical
world, which affects every human action. It is just
this "moral field" which causes that every morally
correct behaviour must climb uphill in it. This climbing
in turn requires from us the contribution of a significant
intellectual, emotional, and physical effort to every
our moral acting. On the other hand, every immoral
acting depends just on sliding downhill in the moral
field. Hence every immoral acting always is easy and
pleasurable. Due to a high significance and complexity
of the moral field, more accurate descriptions of it are
provided in other totaliztic publications - e.g. see
items #C4.2 and #C4.2.1 from my web page named
morals.htm,
or see item #J1 and Figure #I1 from my webs page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.
On this web page, a brief discussion of the moral
field is also included in item #H2.
Moral energy, and moral laws, as well as other
so-called "indicators of
the moral correctness" (broadly
described in items #C4 to #C4.6 from the page named
morals.htm),
in reality are all derived from the moral field - which
fact does NOT decrease their enormous significance
to our lives. For example, moral energy relates
to the moral field the same way as is the potential
energy relates to the gravitational field. In turn
moral laws are simply principles on which
work moral mechanisms that form moral field.
This part of the web page tries to explain in possibly
most simple and most understandable for everyone
manner, one amongst these three fundamental quantities
of totalizm, namely the "moral energy". It informs
how moral energy can be defined unambiguously,
proven that it does exist, measured, and utilised
for lifting the level of our personal happiness and
quality of our lives. But we must remember, that
in a similar manner practically everything that
totalizm uses, is definable, measurable, can
be scientifically proven, and can be directly
utilised for lifting the quality of our life.
#D2.
Moral energy in totalizm:
In item #B1 from the initial part of this web
page was mentioned the so-called
moral energy.
Together with moral field, moral laws, and
karma,
this moral energy represents one of the most
fundamental ideas and quantities of totalizm.
Because "moral energy" performs in totalizm equally fundamental
function, as in physics and in biological sciences performs "physical energy",
in the following part of the web page this energy is going to be discussed
in more details.
The simplest explanation
what actually is this "moral energy" results from the similarity between moral
field and gravity field that is illustrated at the beginning of this web page. As we
all probably remember from classes of physics, each time when we physically
climb uphill in the gravity field, then our "potential energy" converts according
to the equation "E = mgh". In turn the existence of moral field in the universe
causes, that every our action either lifts us uphill, or slides us downhill in this
invisible for human eyes "moral field", which is very similar to the gravity
field. This in turn means practically that literally every our action causes in
us a change of the potential energy of this moral field. This energy which then
changes in us is called the "moral energy". Expressing this in other words,
similarly as climbing stairs in the gravity field increases our potential energy,
also lifting ourselves uphill in the moral field due to taking a moral course
of action increases our moral energy. Thus every action that we undertake
in our lives, even if this is so insignificant thing as washing our teeth or sharpening
our pencil, increases or decreases in us the amount of moral energy. Only
that in order to determine whether it is increasing or decreasing this energy,
we firstly must know how for this action runs in relationship to the moral field.
In turn the topography of the moral field in relationship to a given action is
defined by the circumstances in which this action takes place and by the goal
for which it is to serve. For example, if we wash teeth in order to seduce
someone in a cunning manner, or if we sharpen a pencil in order to
harm someone with it, then these activities are going to disperse a part
of our moral energy. But if we wash teeth in order to stay healthier,
while we sharpen a pencil in order to draw a picture which is going
to make someone very happy, this is going to increase our moral energy.
The general rule which governs this increasing or decreasing our moral
energy is defined by the so-called "line of the highest intellectual effort"
(this line runs in the direction which is exactly opposite to the so-called
"line of the least intellectual resistance" - about which we probably have
heard already). If a given action runs according to this line of the highest
intellectual effort, then it increases our moral energy. But if it runs according
to the line of the smallest intellectual resistance, then it decreases our
moral energy.
Moral energy
represents a form of bio-energy that is absolutely
necessary for living. It is consumed whenever we try
to accomplish anything or try to gain access to any
important quality of life, e.g. to pleasure, happiness,
health, peace of mind, self-fulfilment, respect of
others, etc. Without this energy we are unable to
accomplish any of these qualities. Totalizm teaches
us how to effectively generate this energy, and how
later channel the energy that we have so that we
transform it into all these desirable qualities that
expect to reach in life. The idea of "moral energy"
that totalizm uses, represents a scientific equivalent
for quantities which ancient Chinese used to call
"chi", while in Japan it is called "reiki". Totalizm informs,
that this special energy can be generated not only in ways
that ancient scholars advocated, means through martial-arts
(e.g. "kung-fu"), self-discipline, physical training, etc.,
but also through a consistent climbing upward in the moral
field. (Actually the only manner of accumulating moral
energy that totalizm advocates, is through continuous
climbing upward in the moral field, means through obeying
so-called "moral laws" in everything that we do.) In turn
when this energy is accumulated, it can be converted into
anything that we wish, means into a success in whatever
we are doing, pleasure, happiness, health, peace, etc.
So this moral energy is a kind of invisible "currency"
that allows us to immediately "buy" anything that we
wish, thus which opens for us access to a multitude
of benefits.
In cases when the summary of attributes and
behaviours of moral energy described here,
someone would wish to complement with additional readings,
this energy is described comprehensively in subsections I4.3, JA5.1,
JB3.3, and JG3 from volumes (respectively) 5 to 8
of monograph [1/5]. (Notice that free copies of
monograph [1/5],
can be downloaded to your own computer without limitations,
amongst others also from this web site. Volumes 4 to 8 of this
monograph [1/5] presently constitute the most current "textbook
of totalizm". Especially worth reading is volume 6.)
#D3.
Totaliztic definitions of sins and good deeds:
Because practically
every our action either increases or decreases the amount of moral
energy accumulated in someone, similarly to religions also totalizm
subdivided all human activities into two basic categories, namely
these of totaliztic sins and these of totaliztic good deeds.
However, the totaliztic definitions of sins and good deeds are much
more strict and scientific than their religious equivalents. For example
as a sin totalizm understands every activity which decreases moral
energy in at least one of the parties affected by it. In turn a totaliztic
good deed is every activity which in all parties affected by it
increases their moral energy. Because of such strict, precise, and
measurable definitions of totaliztic sins and good deeds, and also
because of the extremely loose interpretations of these two ideas
in religions, some activities which in religions are considered to be
sins, by totalizm are classified as good deeds, and vice versa. Their
example can be a sexual intercourse of an unmarried couple which
loves each other and which intends to get married, or admiring for
artistic reasons a photograph of someone's naked and beautiful body.
Furthermore, according to totalizm every human action in one set of
circumstances can be a sin, while in another set of circumstances
exactly the same action can be a good deed. The reason is that
qualifying a given action to one of these two basic categories depends
on how the moral field runs in relationship to it. In turn religions qualify
solely actions, i.e. without considering how the moral fields runs in
relationship to these actions. Thus in religions given actions always
belong to the same categories independently of circumstances in
which they are carried out.
More information about totaliztic "sins" and
"good deeds" is presented in subsection JA5
from volume 6 of monograph [1/5].
#D4.
Attributes of moral energy:
Moral
energy is extremely unusual kind of energy. The attributes
of it clearly differ from attributes of physical energy that
we learned from physical sciences and from medicine.
For example, moral energy displays the presence of
following attributes:
(i) It is
intelligent. This means that actions of this energy always
display a high intelligence, and also that it can be ordered to
work in a clearly intelligent manner (e.g. ordered to affect only
the specifically indicated objects within a large pool of similar
objects).
(ii) It has own
sphere of influences. Generally speaking, the area in which
this energy was accumulated, is also an area in which it can be
utilised. For example, if the accumulation of this energy is accomplished
due to healing of people, then the energy that one accumulated can
also be utilised for healing. If someone accumulated it in the result
of practicing so-called "martial arts" (e.g. "Kung Fu"), then it could
be utilised mainly for accomplishing extraordinary effects in these
"martial arts".
(iii) It allows
to be transformed into any kind of physical energy.
Intelligent moral energy in specific circumstances can be
transformed into any other non-intelligent physical energy,
for example into heat, energy of explosion or breaking, ability
to lift or to overcome, etc.
(iv) It
obeys our mental commands. Thus it is capable of completing
at our mental command any work that we order it to be carried out
and that lies in the sphere of application of it. For example, I saw
with my own eyes how masters of the Chinese so-called
"kung fu" disintegrated into powder steel bars with the use
of this energy. (Chinese call this energy with the name of "chi".)
(v) It is absolutely necessary for our life and
health. In fact, the moral energy is described
by totalizm as a kind of oxygen for our souls.
If we loose it completely, then we are forced to die.
If we have not enough of it, then we suffer illnesses,
fall victims of addictions, and continually experience
chronic mental depression (also called the
"black dog"). In turn when we have a lot of it, then
our life is one string of happiness and good health.
(vi) It obeys the majority of laws that are also
obeyed by physical energy which we already
know so well. For example, it can be generated
and accumulated, it disperses, it transforms
according to appropriate principles and rules, etc.
#D5.
Definition of moral energy:
Moral energy can be
defined on many different ways, depending on the criterion that is
adopted for providing a given definition. The simplest definition of
this energy can be accomplished if for this criterion is adopted a
manner on which this energy is accumulated and utilised. In such
a case it could be defined in the following manner: moral energy
is a form of intelligent energy which we accumulate in our counter-body
each time when with the contribution of our effort we carry out some
activity that displays a "moral character", means an activity that
lifts us uphill in the moral field, while which we can then utilise for
accomplishing any quality searched for by us, means utilise for
accomplishing e.g. personal happiness, pleasure, health, success, etc.
The amount of moral
energy can already be measured. The unit of it is "one hour of physical
struggle", marked as 1 [hps]. This unit can be defined as follows:
"one hour of physical struggle, or 1 [hps], is such an amount of
moral energy, which a single person is capable to generate through
a morally positive heavy physical work carried out without the visual
contact with the recipients of this work, if he or she physically is going
to work very hard by a whole hour, and he or she is going to put in this
struggle the entire contribution of the multilevel feelings (i.e. pain,
tiredness, sweat, sleepiness, boredom, etc.) that normally it is possible
to withstand, and also the entire load of positive moral motivations
that a typical person is capable to induce in himself or herself.".
In comparison to
present units of physical energy, such as for example "kilo-Watt-hour",
the above unit may appear to be quite primitive. However, at the present
level of development of totalizm we are just in a situation very similar to
the one, which in physical sciences existed in times of constructing first
steam locomotives. In turn, as probably the reader is aware of this,
the power of first steam locomotives was expressed with the use of
an unit of measure called a "mechanical horse". The measurement of
this power initially was organised in that way, that to a steam locomotive
was tied up an increasingly larger number of ordinary horses which
were wresting with this locomotive trying to pull it in their direction.
The largest number of horses that a given locomotive was still
able to overcome and pull in its own direction, was expressing
the mechanical power of this locomotive. Similarly today is with
totalizm. The unit [hps] may appear to be the same primitive as
an old "mechanical horse" - but still it allows for a first rough
measurement and determination of the amount of moral energy.
#D6.
Relative level "µ" (mi) of moral energy:
The absolute amount
of moral energy that someone managed to accumulate is not very
useful expressing our moral state. After all, for example the
amount E = 100 [hps] is a lot for a child, while it is rather
a little for an adult. Therefore the best way of expressing someone's
moral energy is to describe it with the use of dimensionless
coefficient "µ" (mi) which is defined by the following equation: µ = E/Emax.
(This equation states that our "level of saturation with the moral energy"
(mi) is equal to the amount of energy "E" which we managed to accumulate
in ourselves, divided by the total capacitance of our counter-body
for energy "Emax", means by the maximal amount of moral energy
which this counter-body would be able to accumulate in itself.)
In 1998 I carried out
measurements of amounts of moral energy which at that time I accumulated
in my counter-body. As I determined then, the highest amount of moral
energy that I ever managed to accumulate in my counter-body was around
E = 1400 [hps]. In turn the total capacitance of my counter-body, means the
greatest amount of moral energy that my counter-body was able to
accumulate in itself at that time, was around Emax = 2000 [hps].
Means that in this peak time of my life my coefficient "µ" (i.e. the "relative
level of saturation of my counter-body with moral energy", marked as
"µ" or "mi") amounted to: µ = E/Emax = 0.7. At such
high level of "mi" one experiences a phenomenon,
which I was privately called the "Niagara
nirvana".
This is because after accomplishing the level
around µ = 0.7 one starts to have an impression that from the inside of
his or her body a roaring waterfall of "Niagara" of bubbly, dynamic energy
of happiness is gushing, which inducing an indescribable pleasure tries to
pull of and take away every individual cell of our body. For a comparison
I also add, that during a single day of this peak time of my life, I was able
to generate and accumulate in my counter-body around 14 [hps] of moral
energy. Means, in order to generate the amount of moral energy that is
needed to exceed the "barrier of nirvana" at µ = 0.6 and to experience such
a "Niagara" of happiness, it was necessary to put into this generation
not less than around 100 subsequent days of intense physical struggle
that was devoted to some highly moral goal and thus that lifted me uphill
in the moral field.
Totalizm defines feelings
as kinds of sensations which we experience when the moral energy is
flowing through special "valves" which connect our physical body with
our counter-body. (In so-called "alternative sciences" these valves
which enable the flow of moral energy between two our bodies are
called "chakras". In turn our counter-body is named in these sciences
with the use of such terms as e.g. "energy body", "astral body", "aura",
"spirit", etc.) If the moral energy flows from the physical body to the
counter-body, then the sensations that we experience are always
unpleasant type, e.g. tiredness, pain, exhaustion, hunger, thirst, etc.
This is the reason why every activity which lifts us uphill in the moral
field, and thus which belongs to the category of "moral activities"
(means "good deeds") always costs us experiencing significant effort,
pain, hunger, thirst, etc. In turn, if the moral energy flows from the
counter-body to the physical body, then a sensation that we experience
is always a kind of pleasure. So if with continuous moral activities
someone managed to lift the level of saturation of his or her counter-body
with the moral energy above the threshold value of nirvana amounting to
µ = E/Emax = 0.6, then the moral energy starts in such someone to
overflow spontaneously through these "valves" called "chakras".
Such a spontaneous overflowing of moral energy in someone is known
as a phenomenon called the
nirvana.
Thus, according to totalizm, nirvana is a sensation of enormous happiness that overwhelms
us spontaneously immediately after the level of our moral energy exceeds
the relative threshold level of nirvana amounting to µ = 0.6. Otherwise
than this is a case with normal feelings of pleasure, which appear during
a short-term opening of these valves, e.g. as a result of reaching a goal
that one dreamed about, in case of experiencing an orgasm, or after
taking alcohol or drugs, the nirvana is a permanent phenomenon and it
does NOT disappear after a short while. When I earned a nirvana in
1998, it lasted continually for around 9 months. The level of pleasurable
sensations that one experiences during a nirvana can only be compared
to sexual orgasm. Only that orgasm belongs to feelings of the type "pleasure",
while the nirvana is clearly a feeling of "happiness". Totalizm teaches
that a nirvana can be intentionally earned in a highly methodical and
planned manner. How this could be accomplished is briefly explained in
item #D11 here, while in a systematic manner is elaborated in subsection
JE9 from volume 8 of monograph [1/5]. After one earns nirvana, one is
constantly experiencing such an overwhelming happiness that cannot
be compared to anything else. In addition to this, happiness from the
nirvana does not have any undesirable side effects.
Therefore I would highly recommend to all drug addicts, that instead
of immoral ruining with drugs the health and life of your own and others,
I would rather advice you to earn for yourself a highly moral "totaliztic nirvana".
After all, the contribution of effort to earn a totaliztic nirvana is almost
the same as that required for earning funds for drugs, while the level
of happiness is incomparably higher for nirvana and it does NOT have
any undesirable consequences or side effects. Furthermore, the moral
nirvana introduces only pleasurable returns of our karma, while the
immoral drugs charge our karma with returns, the suffering through
which unfortunately is not going to be pleasant.
More information about totaliztic nirvana is presented
in chapter JE from volume 8 of monograph [1/5].
There is also a separate web page
"totaliztic nirvana"
entirely devoted to the topic of nirvana.
#D8.
Impact of "moral energy" and "morality" at our mental and physical health:
In order to practice totalizm with deep conviction
in our everyday life, we need to know every
area of life which is impacted by this philosophy.
As it turns out, totalizm does not change only
the level of our happiness, satisfaction,
self-fulfilment, etc., but it also impacts
our mental and physical health. This impact
on health is explained thoroughly in a number
of totaliztic publications. For example, it is
briefly referred to in item #D10 below. In
turn its more comprehensive explanation
provides item #P1 on the web page named
changelings.htm,
and subsections JD1 from volume 7 and
JE8 from volume 8 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
#D9.
Relationship between the level of moral energy "µ" and states of intellects:
In 1998 I carried out
quite intense research on relationship between the amount of moral
energy that someone managed to accumulate in his or her counter-body,
and the personality of this intellect. As my research revealed, all
people who had a given and similar level "µ" of saturation of their
counter-body with moral energy, displayed similar personalities. Putting
this in other words, a "personality" of someone, and the way someone
feels, actually is defined by the amount of moral energy that he or she
accumulated in his or her counter-body. For example, all people in
whom their "µ" fell significantly below the value "µ=0.4" were troubled
by increasingly frequent attacks of mental depression. In turn all people
whose "µ" slipped down decisively below the value "µ=0.3" begin to
display increasingly frequent attacks of destructive tendencies, i.e. they
then tend to destroy everything in their surroundings and also periodically
had attacks of suicidal tendencies. What is even more interesting, these
similar states were displayed not only by individual people, but also by
entire institutions and even countries (this is why in descriptions of totalizm
I rather refer to them as to "intellects" instead of "people"). For example,
in 2005 several countries existed already on Earth which most probably
reaches the average level of the saturation with moral energy close to
as low as "µ=0.2".
Out of these my research
of dependencies between someone's personality or state, and the value
of "µ" that a given intellect managed to accumulate, a rather interesting
finding emerged. Namely, it turned out that in the full range of values
of "µ" which given intellects may experience, i.e. in the range from µ = 1
to µ = 0, several different moral states and conditions appear, which a
given intellect obtains when the value of its "µ" reaches a specific level.
The most noticeable out of these states or conditions, that are experienced
by intellects in which the coefficient "µ" changes in the full range of possible
values, can be named in the following manner:
(µ > 0.6) Nirvana. People in which "µ"
exceeded the threshold value of "µ=0.6" start
to experience an extraordinary phenomenon
described here under the name of
"totaliztic nirvana".
(µ = 0.5) Adoration.
(µ = 0.4) Friendliness.
(µ = 0.35) Remaining unnoticeable.
The value "µ = 0.35" represents a border value between intellects which already
accumulated in themselves a reserve of moral energy, and intellects which show
a deficiency of this energy. People with the value of "µ = 0.35" are usually very
quiet and non-imposing. Their existence normally passes unnoticed by other
people.
(µ = 0.3) Becoming provocative.
(Also states of chronic mental depression seem to attack all these people whose
relative level of saturation with moral energy falls below the value of µ = 0.35.)
(µ = 0.2) Lethargy.
(µ = 0.1) Destructiveness
(including suicidal tendencies).
(µ = 0) Moral death.
The knowledge of the above
relationship between the personalities and the level of saturation with moral
energy is very useful in diagnosing our own moral state or the state of
people close to us. This is because if we notice that either we ourselves,
or someone from our close ones, displays signs of the fall of his or her
"µ" below the critical level of "µ = 0.35", then this should become for us
a sound of alarm. We should then make sure, that such someone
initiates some sort of activities that would build up his or her level of moral
energy. If such someone fails to rebuild this level, and allows that his or her
moral energy still slips even lower, this most probably is going to finish
rather tragically.
At this point it is worth to notice,
that there is several manners of determining the level "µ" of someone's
saturation with moral energy. The most accurate one out of these, depends
on actual measurements of the generation and dispersion of moral energy.
But it is rather difficult and only people with scientific inclinations are capable
of accomplishing it. Other method depends on measurement of this level
with the use of divining pendulum. People especially sensitive are also able
to feel this level after they approach a given person. (In 1998, when I carried
out the research described here, I was myself able to sense this level in
every person which I approached when no-one was nearby who would
disturb my perception with his or her own energy. In people for which their
"µ" amounted above "µ = 0.35" I felt the emission of a kind of "warmth",
the intensity of which increased proportionally to the increase in their "µ".
In turn people in which "µ" fell down below "µ = 0.35", emitted a kind of
clearly perceived "coldness" which deepen together with the fall of their
"µ". After 1998 I ceased researching this topic. For some time now I
noticed, that I am not able any more to perceive with my senses what is
the current level of moral energy in a specific person.) In turn the most
easy manner of determining the level of moral energy depends on
comparing the current personality of someone with the above scale
which was developed in the result of my research of this subject matter.
More information about how the personality, state,
and wellbeing of intellects, depends on the level of
saturation with moral energy, is explained in subsection
OA8.6.3 from volume 13 of monograph [1/5]. In turn manners of
determining the level of this energy in ourselves or in someone
from our surrounding, are described in chapter JE
from volume 8 of monograph [1/5].
#D10.
Mental depression ("black dog") as a warning alarm of an excessive drop in the level of moral energy:
The accumulation of moral energy (energy
"zwow") is absolutely necessary for our life
and health. In fact, the moral energy is
described by totalizm as a kind of oxygen
for our souls. If we loose it completely,
then we are forced to die. If we have not
enough of it, then we suffer illnesses, fall
victims of addictions, and continually
experience chronic mental depression.
In turn when we have a lot of it, then we
accomplish the extraordinary state of
nirvana,
while our life becomes a single string
of happiness and good health.
As it turns out, the depression caused by the
deficit of moral energy ("zwow") CANNOT
be healed by anything else than the rebuilding
of the level of our moral energy. In past people
used to believe that the depression can be healed
with various "anti-depressants" tablets of the kind
of "Prozac". However, research which near the
end of February 2008 shook the entire world
has proven, that these tablets do not work at all.
As this is described by the article "Depression
symptom of a sick society" which appeared on
page A19 of the New Zealand newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Thursday, March 6, 2008,
mental depression belongs to illnesses which
cannot be healed just by swallowing tablets.
Of course, after discovering that pills do NOT
heal depression, people started to resort to
alternative methods of healing this illness.
What more interesting, although there is NO
mention in all these alternative methods of
healing depression about the link of this
illness to the deficit of moral energy in sick
people, in fact descriptions of methods of
healing this illness boil down to rebuilding
in ill people the level of their moral energy -
but with avoiding to name the "moral energy"
this something that is rebuild in ill people.
This principle of healing depression through
the rebuilding in ill people the level of their
moral energy very clearly emerges e.g. from
descriptions of healing depression provided
in such articles as "Depression experts take
steps toward alternatives to anti-depressant
drugs" from page A13 of New Zealand newspaper
The Press,
issue dated on Saturday, March 8, 2008,
or "Depression tied to unhealthy habits"
from page A11 of the New Zealand newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Monday, March 10, 2008.
About mental depression ("black dog") as an
illness that results from the lack of moral energy,
is treating also the web page
parasitism.htm - about parasitism, i.e. the immoral philosophy of decadent lifestyle
(e.g. see item #E1 in there).
#D11.
How to increase in ourselves the amount of moral energy:
The philosophy of totalizm
states that practically every work which lifts us uphill in the moral field
is increasing our moral energy. Means that everything that we do in our
lives, and that has a moral character, lifts the amount of moral energy
accumulated in our counter-body. However, some kinds of work
lift our level of this energy much faster and more effective than others.
For example, according to my research the physical labour generates
around 5 times more moral energy than a mental work of a comparable
effort. So in order to generate, let say 1 [hps] of moral energy, we must
work mentally as much as 5 hours. Thus with the use of solely mental
work it is practically impossible to earn a totaliztic nirvana for a simple
reason that there is not enough hours in each day to accumulate the
required level of moral energy. But a skilfully designed physical work
allows to earn intentionally the totaliztic nirvana. So here is a list of
attributes of a work, which according to findings of totalizm cause, that
a physical work which fulfils these attributes is going to generate in
our counter-body especially large amounts of moral energy.
(i) This work must
pedantically obey moral laws. Every work which breaks moral laws
not only that never generates moral energy, but actually causes a
rapid dispersion of this energy.
(ii) It must be a
heavy physical work (i.e. one needs to carry out voluntarily a physical
"struggle"). Thus the completion of this work must require from
us to overcome a physical pain, tiredness, thirst, hunger, discouragement,
impatience, sleepiness, boredom, etc., that the work induces in us.
(iii) Our motives
for undertaking this work must be voluntary, highly moral, and altruistic.
This means that we must undertake this work voluntarily, from our own
choice and will. We also must be deeply convinced, that it serves for
the good of other people (but whom we do not know in person), for the
good of our civilisation, peace, progress, etc. (Notice, however, that if
it serves for the good of specific people whom we know very well, e.g.
someone amongst our family members, it is going to generate much
less moral energy. Furthermore, if someone forces us to carry out
this struggle, then instead of generating moral energy, it may even
disperse this energy.)
(iv) It should not
provide us with any financial or personal gains. For example,
if we are to be paid for this work, the knowledge of the fact that it
is for our own benefit is going to spoil our motivations and thus also
the yield of moral energy that it generates. In fact, the more financial
gains we expect from a given work, or the better paid it is, the less
moral energy it generates.
(v) People
for the good of which we address the outcomes of it, should NOT
know from whom these outcomes originate. Means, if this
is possible, we should carry out this work completely anonymously,
so that final recipients that are to benefit from outcomes of it do
not know from whom these outcomes originate.
(vi) We should carry
out this work when no-one is watching us. The most destructive
impact on the yield of moral energy generated by a given work has
the watching of process of completing it by people with a rotten morality,
means people who envy, who are vindictive, contradictive, evil, etc.
Also every immoral suspicion posted to us telepathically by witnesses
of this work, is going to decrease the moral energy that this work generates.
Examples of kinds
of work that would generate for us huge amounts of mortal energy, include
e.g. getting up early morning and removing anonymously snow from a footpath
about which we know that later it is going to be used by many people - although
local authorities always seem to forget the de-snowing of it, cultivating a side of
some rarely used road and planting flowers by it, or volunteering to a farmer
or an orchard owner in the centre of harvesting season to help him or her to harvest
products about which we believe sincerely that these products are going to
be consumed by many people, bringing health and pleasure to these people
(though, we need to help either completely for free, or just for a symbolic return
- e.g. for meals and lodging). In cases when we do not have an access to
such works, then even digging and planting our own garden in order to make
it pretty and beneficial to passers by, or even washing and thorough cleaning
house of our parents when they are not at home, also will generate in us
a lot of this energy. When even this exceeds beyond our possibilities,
then even disciplined carrying out some difficult and tiring physical exercises
with the moral motivation that they are to assist our body to serve better to
community and to humanity, will also generate moral energy in us.
More about types of work which most intensely generate moral energy
in us, is provided in subsection JE9 from volume 8 of monograph [1/5].
I highly recommend reading this subsection JF9, and - if situation allows,
also subsections that proceed it.
Part #E:
The
philosophy of parasitism -
means the opposite, enemy and adversary of the philosophy of totalizm:
The existence of moral field and
moral laws causes that people
have only two choices in their lives. Namely they either can
choose to obey these moral laws, or to disobey them.
These people who predominantly obey moral laws in their lives,
are called totalizts. To the category of totalizts
belong also the so-called intuitive totalizts, means people
who do not know about the existence of moral laws and totalizm,
but who still obey them intuitively because they listen to their
counter-organ of conscience. (Intuitive totalizts usually are
unaware that they actually practice the philosophy of totalizm.)
In turn those people who predominantly
disobey moral laws are called parasites. The impulsive
philosophy which parasites follow in their lives is called
parasitism.
As this is explained below, there is an
important reason for such a name. This reason originates from
the final effects of the punishing mechanism which is triggered
by someone's disobedience of moral laws. (This mechanism is
explained in volume 13 of English monograph [1/5].) This punishing
mechanism causes, that people who disobey moral laws land
leading lives if intelligent parasites, who live from work
of others. Thus the name "parasites" for them and "parasitism"
for their philosophy is fully deserved. (For more details about
this destructive philosophy see either a separate web page about
parasitism,
or volume 13 in new monograph [1/5],
or volume 3 in older monograph [8].)
#E2.
Group intellects:
Instead of using words "man", "person",
"people", etc., to describe intelligent creatures
which lead own independent lives, totalizm
describes all of them with the word "intellect".
An intellect for totalizm is everything that is intelligent,
that is able to live independently, and that in
any way is aware of the work of "morality"
(i.e. that has its own organ of "conscience").
Thus, for totalizm every person is an "intellect"
(or an "individual intellect"). God is the "universal
intellect". So-called "UFOnauts" are "intellects" too.
Even domesticated animals - which contrary to
wild animals also are supplied in organs of
conscience which inform them whether a given
activity is allowed or is forbidden for them, are
"animal intellects" as well.
The philosophy of totalizm explains also, that not
only individual people "lead their own lives", and
therefore they are subjected to the action of "moral
laws". It turns out that also larger bodies, like entire
families, ships, factories, offices, banks, institutions,
villages, cities, political parties, religions, nations, countries, etc. -
they all also create large living organisms, which
"live their separate lives", and therefore also
are subjected to the action of "moral laws". For
such large bodies individual people are just
components, similarly like in individual people
are body cells. In the philosophy of totalizm
such large bodies, or large living organisms,
which are composed of many individual people,
are called group intellects. An excellent
example of a "group intellect" is the entire
"human science" which as a whole deeply believes
(and acts on this belief) that e.g. "God does NOT
exist" or that the "petrified skeletons of dinosaurs
are the evidence that dinosaurs lived once on the
Earth" - but see item #A2.2 of this web page, item
#B1 on the web page named
changelings.htm,
or item #H2 on the web page named
god_exists.htm.
All "group intellects" are subjected to the action
of the same "moral laws" as individual humans do.
For example, "group intellects" which refuse to
listen to the voice of their "group conscience"
are also terminated by God - as this is explained
in items #G1 and #G4 of the web page named
will.htm.
Only that instead of being "send to another world",
as God typically does it with individual people who
ceased to listen to the voice of their conscience,
such "group intellects are bankrupted, dissolved,
or absorbed by other group intellects. Onto the
group intellects acts also a group version of the
"Boomerang Principle" - as for the return of
karma of Christians (for their action during Medieval
Inquisition), the work of this principle is described
in item #A2 of the web page named
petone.htm.
Therefore the fate of these "group intellects"
takes an identical course like does the life of
individual humans. Only that their fate typically
changes much slower than the fate of individual
people. Also methods and mechanisms that God
uses for controlling the development of their group
morality are slightly different (more complex) than
these for individual people - see item #B4 on the web page
mozajski_uk.htm.
But the most fascinating for the new "totaliztic
science" is the phenomenon of the "group morality"
which is manifested by all "group intellects". In
this "group morality" such "group intellects" interact
with other intellects as if all individual people composed
onto them practiced exactly the same "morality".
Means, in spite that every "group intellect" is composed
from many individual people whose levels of morality
are different, and also in spite that each one amongst
these people is tied differently to this group intellect
at an emotional and physical level, still the interaction
of each one amongst these people onto all outside
intellects does NOT represent a random character,
but always is consistent - as if at the time when they
represent their group intellect all these people are
one and the same person, or as if they all make
an agreement as to how they supposed to treat
someone from the outside. For example, when
the "group intellect" - such as the entire present
official science, started an open persecution of
Christians - as this is described in items #A2 and
#C3 on the abovementioned web page named
petone.htm,
then each Christian, whom was forced to interact
in the matter of religion with any representative
of that official science, receives from that representative
almost the same persecuting treatment. Or for
example during a war, almost each citizen of an
occupied country receives from representatives
of the occupant very similar treatment, which results
from the group morality practiced by that occupant.
Such consistent treatments from group intellects
(usually rather bad) the reader probably also experienced
many times, when was forced to do anything e.g.
in governmental offices. Such a "group morality"
of every group intellect is just the subject and
the cause of specific treatment by moral laws and
by moral mechanisms that this group intellect
receives as a whole. It is that "group morality"
that causes, that e.g. aggressors always loose
every war that they started - as this is described
in item #C5.2 on the web page named
morals.htm,
while e.g. every bank which cheats and lies with
the elapse of time is going to be bankrupted - as
this is explained in item #G4 on the web page named
will.htm.
If such a group intellect predominantly obeys
moral laws in all actions, than it practices a
form of philosophy of totalizm. In such a case
the fate of this group intellect is very similar
to the fate of individual totalizts, namely it
grows, expands, is healthy, keeps good
image and people happy, etc. But if such
a group intellect predominantly disobeys
moral laws in all actions, than it practices
a form of parasitism. The parasitism practiced
by a group intellect is called institutional
parasitism. Institutions which practice this
parasitism are very easy to recognise from a stuffy atmosphere that
prevails in them, from countless cases of injustice that are committed
inside of them, from rampaging bureaucracy, from unhappy employees,
from the large turnover of employees, from constant internal problems,
from the fact that they shrink constantly and shut down increasingly large
number of functions that they supposed to perform, etc. Similarly like
individual parasites, also parasitic institutions always live on the cost
of others. If they are unable to exploit, rob, and live from work of others
openly, they do it in a hidden manner. It is interesting that the theory
of parasitic institutions explains also exactly what a religious fanaticism
is, and why it appears in only some religions and cults. As it turns out
religious fanaticism is manifestation of the philosophy of parasitism
practiced by a given religious institution.
#E4.
When institutions turn into parasitism:
Very interesting are outcomes of my
research on parasitic groups of students.
The goal of this research was to determine what turns a given group intellect
(such as a group of students) typically composed of totalizts and parasites,
into a fully parasitic institution. With students such research is easy,
because if a given group of students practices an institutional parasitism,
the process of teaching cannot be carried out for them. As my research indicate,
such group intellects turn into parasitic intellects if either (1) their leader
practices parasitism, or (2) over 30% of normal members of the group
practices parasitism. This means that all group intellects (e.g. families,
factories, institutions, countries, etc.) which are already practicing
institutional parasitism, have in them over 30% of population,
or (and) their leadership, already practicing parasitism. The alarming
problem that recently emerged, is that the number of such parasitic
institutions and countries constantly raises.
#E5.
Parasitic countries:
When the philosophy
of parasitism becomes a dominating philosophy in a country, then
this country transforms into a parasitic country. Such parasitic
countries can be recognised due to a whole range of attributes,
the most important of which include, amongst others:
the growing demoralisation of the citizens, rampaging psychological
depression, continually increasing level of crime, addictions, and
mental illnesses, huge number of mutually contradictive laws and
spreading "legalized" lawlessness, large emigration caused by
the escape of citizens to other less parasitic countries, the gradual
collapse of education and scientific research, the lack of investments
and a mysterious "disappearance" of governmental funds, continually
enlarging central institutions and the number of governmental officials,
the growing number of "taboo" topics the talking about which is
persecuted in various (hidden) manners, growing double-standard
means promising and public talk about one thing and actual during
complete reversal, etc., etc.
#E6.
Parasitic civilisations:
If an entire civilisation
begins to practice a philosophy of parasitism, then it becomes
a parasitic civilisation. Parasitic civilisations live
exclusively from robbery and exploitation of other civilisations. If
such a civilisation is a primitive one, like ancient Romans, then it
robs and exploits the neighbours, or second class citizens, or illegal
immigrants, turning them into slaves. But if such a parasitic
civilisation has a means of interstellar travel, then it
becomes a civilisation of cosmic bandits and robbers. It lives at the
expense of other cosmic civilisations that are less technologically
developed than it. The extremely bad luck of humanity is that from
the beginning of times it is in power just such a parasitic civilisation
of cosmic bandits and robbers. The present popular name for citizens
of this parasitic civilisation is "UFOnauts". In past they used to be
called devils or fallen angels. (Also other names were
used, e.g.: bad witches, bad wizards, magicians, Satan, etc.)
Actually, if one analyses methods of action used currently by
UFOnauts on Earth, and compares these methods to these described
by religions as used by devils and Satan, it turns out that the
methods are the same only terminology used by religions for
describing these methods is ancient. Devils and Satan did
exactly what current research and literature on UFOs show
that UFOnauts do to us. (For more details see subsection
OC1 from volume 13, and chapter U from volume 17 of English
monograph [1/5].)
#E7.
Why the simulation by
God
of the existence and secretive operation on the Earth
of parasitic civilisations is beneficial for the humanity
and for the entire universe:
God
designed and completed the universe in
so intelligent manner, that even so-called
evil
serves towards the progress and learning.
It means, in the absolute dimension evil also brings
benefits. Therefore the parasitic civilisations
which rob, exploit, and push others down,
in the absolute dimensions are also needed.
After all, they pay many "favours" to God.
For example, they put to trials and examinations
from morality the humanity as a whole and
every individual human separately, they
create for God the possibility to motivate
easily the entire human civilisation, they
allow God to easy destroy under NOT His
own name everything that is old or that
ceased to fulfil its functions, they slow down
the colonisation and filling up the universe
with people, etc., etc. Unfortunately, the use
by God of really existing morally decadent
civilisations would be very difficult because
such civilisations require a huge effort and
work to control them as required. Therefore,
it is much easier for God to
simulate
the existence of such civilisations. This simulation
is described in more details on separate web
pages - e.g. see the web page
god.htm - about the secular and scientific understanding of God, or
evil.htm - about origins of evil on the Earth.
After all, such parasitic civilisations, the existence
and secretive activities of which on the Earth are
just "simulated" by God, do NOT have "free will",
the awareness and mind of God can be "inserted"
directly to their temporally created physical bodies,
and thus in every smallest detail they do exactly
whatever serves the intentions of God. Simultaneously,
from our, means from the human, point of view,
it does NOT matter whether these parasitic civilisations
which secretly occupy the Earth do exist physically
and really, or their existence is just skilfully "simulated"
by God. In both these cases the final effects of the
action of these parasitic civilisations on the Earth
will be exactly as God in His infinitive wisdom
planned this. Means, these civilisations will be
continually subjecting to moral tests and exams
every human being and the entire human civilisation,
they will allow God to differentiate between valuable
humans and the human trash, they will destroy
whatever God designates to be destroyed, they
will help to punish those ones who deserves to
be punished, etc., etc. So although totalizm
established beyond any doubt, that civilisations
of parasitic UFOnauts do NOT exist physically
at all, but are skilfully and realistically "simulated"
by God, in all totaliztic publications these
civilisations are treated as they do exist equally
real, as real exists the entire human civilisation.
Part #F:
Why peaceful totalizm has enemies and adversaries:
#F1.
Persecuted although needed truths revealed by totalizm:
Motto:
"Telling the truth, even this most unpleasant one, is the manifestation of true love - after all, only by revealing
the truth to these whom we love, we create a chance for them to improve and to make life much better."
If someone listens only to the loud propaganda
that is spread over the Earth by newspapers
and by television, then he or she has an impression
that the human science disperses darkness
of religious superstitions only with a great difficulty,
trying to document to people: that humans
originate from monkeys through the natural
evolution, that God does NOT exist, that our
world created itself in the result of a "big
bang", etc., etc. But if someone has a required
knowledge to actually examine the merit
of this loud propaganda, then he or she
experiences a shock. It turns out that in
reality there is no even a single item of
evidence which would confirm scientifically
the origins of humans from monkeys through
the natural evolution - however there is a huge
body of scientific evidence that it was God
who created the first man and the first woman.
(Some amongst these items of evidence
for the creation of man are presented in
item #B8 of the web page named
evolution.htm,
and in subsection I1.4.2 from volume 5 of
my newest
monograph [1/5].)
It also turns out that physics and other strict
sciences constantly trip over evidence that
God does exist, only that if someone tries
to present this evidence publicly, then he
or she is immediately subjected to various
brutal forms of persecution and discrimination.
(This is why in the vital interest of the entire
humanity lies a fast removal of the "monopole
on knowledge" from the present science
by establishing the second, competitive
"totaliztic science" described above
in item #A2.6 of this web page.)
It also turns out, that there are numerous
items of evidence supporting the fact that
God created the physical world, while the
loudly announced, supposed "theories"
of the "big bang" and "escaping galaxies" in fact
have no even a single evidence in their support.
(Some amongst these items of evidence for
the creation of the physical world by God,
are presented in items #D3 and #I4 of the web page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
and in volume 1 of my newest
monograph [1/5].)
From the real life we all know that if in a specific
matter there is so drastic divergence between
what is officially told, and what is the actual truth,
then such state of things is forced by some
mechanisms unknown yet to people, similar
to the "curse of inventors" described,
amongst others, in item #B4.4 of the web page named
mozajski_uk.htm.
It is the work of just such unknown mechanisms
that totalizm must identify, disclose, and neutralise,
when it tries to promote truths which currently are
not understood, unwanted and persecuted - such
as the truth about the existence of numerous
benefits from leading a highly moral life, or the
truth that "these ones whom we really love
we should reveal the truth, while not telling the
truth, or telling lies - even these most sweet ones,
in fact is a manifestation of hostility and the lack
of respect". After all, only by revealing the
truth we can give a chance to ones that we love
to improve their lives. It is at least a lack of knowledge,
if NOT the stupidity, to think that telling the truth
to someone is a manifestation of hostility - such
views can have only completely thoughtless and
morally immature people.
There is a number of basic truths, the revealing
of which on the Earth is the highly "moral" activity,
because these truths improve the knowledge and
the situation of people. Thus, the spreading of
these truths must run uphill in the "moral field"
and must require the contribution of significant
"effort". As such, their spreading must be hold
back by the abovementioned "curse of inventors".
Truths about the work of morality and God are
just some examples of these. Unfortunately, too
many people still believes that "the revealing of
truth is a manifestation of someone's hostility
towards them". The reality is that "the revealing
of truth - even this one which is the most unpleasant
for us, is a favour, an expression of love,
and the only manner of real helping - after all, in
order to improve or repair something, we firstly
need to learn the entire truth about it".
In other words, without
learning the truth there is NO progress.
However, e.g. the present "atheistic, orthodox
science", which is the institution paid for revealing
truths, is actually too terrorized, too scared,
and too dependent on these people who believe
that "telling the truth is a manifestation of hostility",
to still find a courage for explaining these unwanted
although needed truths, or at least to try to research
some of these truths. Therefore, these most vital
truths usually remain well hidden from the public
view. Before totalizm appeared on the Earth,
explanations for these persecuted but needed
truths were difficult to find. Only totalizm found
a courage and a way to bring them to the public
view, to explain them, and to prove them correct.
Therefore this web page, amongst others, offers
scientific publications (e.g. my newest
monograph [1/5])
that either take a research-based stand in
matters of these unwanted although needed
truths, or clarify them. A list of most important
amongst these truths, together with the summary
of what totalizm determined about each one
of them, are provided in items #C6 and #F2
from the web page named
prawda_uk.htm.
#F2.
The formal scientific proof of totalizm that
God does exist,
and its consequences:
Motto:
"The bigger number of independent paths leads us to the learning of a given truth, the more
sure and more vital this truth is. Because the existence of God, and also the existence of
so-called "supernatural", is confirmed independently by both, the
Bible authored (inspired) by God Himself,
as well as by secular findings of totalizm, this truth is twice as much sure and as much vital."
As this is described in more details in
volume 5, and partially also in volumes
4 and 11, of my newest scientific
monograph [1/5],
the philosophy of totalizm allowed to develop and
to publish a series of several formal scientific proofs
carried out with methods of mathematical logic.
None of these proofs was abolished, so all of
them remain in power. All these proofs are similar
from the methodology point of view, although
each one of them is based on a different kind
of scientific evidence.
The first and the most important (1) out
of these proofs confirms formally and scientifically
that "God does exist" - see item #G2 from
the web page named
god_proof.htm,
or see subsection I3.3.4 from volume 5 of my newest
scientific monograph marked
[1/5].
The abovementioned web page "god_proof.htm"
presents also a vast body of empirical scientific
evidence which additionally confirms the validity
of this proof. This immensely important proof
changes the speculations to-date as to "whether
God exists", into the scientific certainty that this
superior being of the universe in fact does exist.
This certainty of the God's existence is additionally
increased by the remaining ones out of my series
of the proofs discussed here. After all, none of
these proofs could be formulated in the world
without God. And so, the certainty of the God's
existence is increased additionally by the formal
scientific proof (2) which confirms that
"the counter-world does exist". The name
"counter-world is assigned to a world which is
separate from our physical world and in which
God lives.) This proof is published, amongst others,
in item #D3 of the web page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
and also in subsection H1.1.4 from volume 4
of my newest scientific monograph marked
[1/5].
After all, this formal proof confirms the existence
of a separate world in which God lives and to
which our souls move after the physical death.
This certainty is also additionally increased by
the formal scientific proof (3) stating
that "people have immortal souls",
published in item #C1.1 of the web page about the totaliztic
nirvana,
and also in subsection I5.2.1 from volume 5
of my newest scientific monograph marked
[1/5].
This certainty is also confirmed by the formal
scientific proof (4) that it is "God
(not a random evolution) who created the first
pair of people", published in item #B8 of
the web page about
evolution,
and also in subsection NF9 from volume 12
of my newest scientific monograph marked
[1/5].
The certainty is also confirmed by the formal
scientific proof (5) that "the Bible
is authorized by God himself", published
in item #B1 of the web page about the
Bible.
and also in subsection M7.1 from volume 11
of my newest scientific monograph marked
[1/5].
Finally, the certainty is also confirmed by the formal
scientific proof (6) that "the DNA are
the simplest forms of natural computers which
control the passage through time of cells in which
these DNA reside, while this controlling of passage
through the time these DNA accomplish by running
software 'programs of life and fate' that are contained
in their memories", published in item #D7
of the web page named
immortality.htm.
and also in subsection M1.6 from volume 11
of my newest scientific monograph marked
[1/5].
#F3.
Totalizm as an interpreter of messages which God coded into the
Bible
which He authorizes (e.g. coded through a consistent qualifying "serpents"
to the category of animals having high intelligence and human appearance):
Motto:
"Even if you force a serpent into a bamboo tube,
still you cannot straighten its twisted nature."
A monkey looks very similar to a human.
It also have grabbing hands like people do
and also is able to use tools. Furthermore,
it has a high intelligence. In fact a monkey
is even able to carry out implication and
logical deduction - like people do. Can thus
a monkey be classified to a category of
people. Of course NOT. Everyone knows
jolly well that a monkey is an animal - only
that it has a high intelligence and an appearance
similar to humans. So what causes that
given creatures can be classified as people?
After all, it is NOT intelligence - because intelligence
is also present in monkeys and in various other
animals. For example my cat called "Teecee",
described in more details on the web page about
bandits amongst us,
also displayed the intelligence which I compared
to the intelligence of a 2-year old human, and
even displayed the morality which I estimate
as higher than morality of an average "serpent".
(E.g. Teecee always show the sense of guilt
with his behaviour each time he returned from
stealing food designated for cats of a neighbour,
while e.g. UFOnauts do not feel guilty even if they
murder hundreds of thousands of innocent people.)
But Teecee still belonged to the animal kingdom.
To the category of humans do NOT qualify the
appearance either. After all, monkeys have,
while Neanderthal Men had, the appearance
very similar to that of people. But no-one classifies
them as people. The having grabbing hands also
do not make one to be a human, neither the use
of tools. So what causes that a given creature is
qualified to the category of people, not to the
category of "animals gifted with high intelligence
and with human appearance"?
The clarification of this puzzle is encrypted into the
Bible authorized by God.
Namely, creatures which by the Bible are called
"serpents", "dragons", "devils", etc., while by
present people - "UFOnauts", in the entire Bible
authorized by God himself are consistently
qualified to the category of animals, NOT to the
category of people. For example, in this way
categorizes them the verse quoted in previous
item #F2 from the "Book of Genesis", 3:1,
quote: "Now the serpent is the most cunning
of all the animals that the LORD God had create."
The same refusal of qualifying UFOnauts to the
category of people forwards to us also the reply
of Jesus to the temptations of Satan, given
in the "Evangel of St. Matthew", 4:4, quote:
"It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone,
but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God."
(It means, that this verse tries to tell us, amongst
others, that "a human is only this one, who does
NOT live just by bread, but who studies words of
God". In turn Satan, serpents, devils, etc., who
mainly are concerned about material goods,
about power, pleasures of the body, etc., in
eyes of God are NOT humans at all.)
Simultaneously from research on
UFOs
it is already known to us, that these
serpents-UFOnauts are close relatives
of people. After all, both humanity and these serpents-UFOnauts
originate from the same ancestors of humanity from
the Terra planet - as this is explained more comprehensively
on the web page about
evolution.
In spite of this blood relationship of people and
UFOnauts, God qualify people to the category
of humans, but for serpents-UFOnauts the same
God consistently refuses to qualify them as people
and qualifies them as animals equipped with
intelligence and human appearance. As this is
clearly indicating, in eyes of God someone's
qualifying to the category of people or the category
of animals does NOT result from the fact that parents
or ancestors of this someone were people, nor
from intelligence and human appearance shown
by this someone, but from attributes and behaviours
that this someone displays. In other words,
God so designed living
creatures, that they must earn becoming humans
and it is NOT enough for them that they were born
from human parents. What even more
interesting, the above concerns all creatures which
live on the Earth. In other words, NOT all present
members of humanity in eyes of God will be qualified
as people, and a significant proportion of humanity
God is going to qualify to the world of intelligent
animals and then treat the same as animals.
On the other hand, to some present creatures with
animal (currently) structure of the body, God intends
to give in the future a chance to be born as humans
and to become humans.
So what are these attributes which in eyes of God
qualify someone to the category of people? This
question is so important, that if someone does NOT
gain for himself or herself such attributes, then in
eyes of God is going to be treated as an animal.
Of course, the reply God again coded into the
content of the Bible that he authorized. Well, from
the information encrypted in this Bible stems,
that the most important out of these attributes is
the ability, will, and effort of embracing God.
Means, the ability, will, and effort to see the
existence of God in the world that surrounds us,
to distinguish the "hand" of God when God gives
something to us, to study intentions and requirements
of this God, to give to God the correct evidence of
our obedience to his commands, etc., etc. In other
words, those ones who are unable, or do not have
intentions, or do not wish to undertake the effort, of
embracing God, for example all atheists - according
to the information contained in the Bible which is
authorized by this God, in fact belong to the category
of animals with human appearance and human
intelligence, not to the category of people. Of course,
there is a number of manners this ability, will and
effort of embracing God should manifest itself.
Let us list here at least several most vital out of
them. Here is several most vital ones:
1.
Recognize the authority of God and obey
requirements that God imposed over people.
In other words, e.g. every atheist in eyes of God is
just an intelligent animal with human appearance.
After all, animals are unable to recognize and
acknowledge the authority of God. They are also
not able to obey God's requirements. For example,
animals everywhere see only the existence of other
animals - only that sometimes more dangerous
or more provided than they themselves, because
gifted with a bigger power, cunningness, or ability
to generate something delicious. For example,
my cat Teecee with the same respect related
both to me, and to the home fridge. In me he
saw a bigger and stronger animal than himself.
Therefore, in order to make me friendly he used
to bring me, in his opinion tasty mice and frogs.
In turn fridge for him was a kind of a cow which
instead of milk generates infinitive supplies of
tasty cat's food. So in order to also make the
fridge friendly towards him, according to the
cat's etiquette he used to sit opposite to it and
show to it his respect in exactly the same way
as outside of the flat he show his respect to
other cats by sitting for hours in front of them.
Once I noted that he also brought a living frog
to the fridge and wanted to give this frog to the
fridge. Information about this "requirement-manifestation
of the belonging to the humanity" is contained,
amongst others, in the verse quoted previously
from the "Evangel of St. Matthew", 4:4, quote:
"Man shall not live by bread alone, but
by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth
of God." But in fact this "requirement of qualifying
to the category of humans" is so important that it
is repeated across the entire Bible.
2.
Gain skills of recognizing hand, work, and acts of
God, from hands, work, and activities of other powers.
In other words, in order to become a human, one
needs to learn see the hand of God where this
hand in fact do acts. Therefore, these people, who
are unable to notice in the Bible the authorship of
God, but see in it just a book with stories of ancient
shepherds, in fact are in eyes of God just intelligent
animals. (For example, for me is extremely
impressive this well hidden supernatural intelligence
encoded into the
Bible
and manifesting itself e.g. in the manner with which
the Bible expresses extremely correctly even these
most refined ideas, the effectiveness with which it
gives to us the working recipes for living that prove
themselves in action, the effectiveness with which
these ever actual messages were getting through
thousands of years of censorships of serpents-UFOnauts,
etc., etc. Also I do not understand how it is possible,
that some people remain blind to this supernatural
intelligence of the Bible - most clearly in order to
appreciate intelligence contained in something else,
one needs also have at least a threshold level of it.)
These biologists and their sympathizers, who e.g.
in the creation of the first couple of people see just only the act of random evolution,
also have NOT acquire the ability of recognizing the
hand and act of God. Or these physicists, who remain
blind to the conclusions that result from the fact that
electromagnetic waves belong to the category of "transverse waves", which propagate exclusively along the border of two mediums.
Or these medics who search with scalpels through
corners of the brain in order to
find soul
in there, but they simultaneously remain blind and
deaf for NDE (Near Death Experience), multiple
personalities, and other phenomena of this kind.
Etc., etc. The information about the gaining ability
to recognize hand, work, or act of God, is contained,
amongst others in "2 Corinthians", 4:3-4, quote:
"But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are
lost: In whom the god of this world hath blinded
the minds of them which believe not."
3.
Place emphasis on the development of positive
non-physical attributes such as morality, consistency,
helpfulness, goodness, peacefulness, etc., etc.
In other word, obedience to the popular saying
"eat to live, not live to eat", or more strictly "use our
body as an instrument which helps us to acquire
positive intellectual and spiritual values, instead of
treating our intelligence and spirit as tools which
allow us bring pleasures to our body." The information
about the need of using our body as a tool for
accomplishing positive spiritual and intellectual
qualities, not in reverse, is spread all over the
Bible. For example, this information is illustrated
by every word and every action of Jesus - including
into this also words quoted in item 1 above.
4.
Learn totalizm and implement totalizm in our own
life. It is enough to notice in the Internet how
"serpents-UFOnauts" react on every message of
totalizm, to become clear that totalizm is NOT just
another one amongst these dozens of philosophies
invented by "armchair academics". The Bible let us
know about this quite clearly. It is not by coincident
that there are strange parallels between the
name "John" plus characteristics of efforts of the
human author of the totalizm,
and the content of following verse from the
Biblical Evangel of St. John, 1:6-14, quote:
"There came a man who was sent from God;
his name was John. He came as a witness
to testify concerning that light, so that
through him all men might believe. He
himself was not the light; he came only
as a witness to the light. The true light
that gives light to every man was coming
into the world. He was in the world,
and though the world was made through him,
the world did not recognize him. He came
to that which was his own, but his own did
not receive him. Yet to all who received him,
to those who believed in his name, he gave
the right to become children of God - children
born not of natural descent, nor of human
decision or a husband's will, but born of
God. The Word became flesh ..."
Totalizm states that nothing is a "coincidence".
So it is NOT a coincidence also that the shockingly
symbolic fate of totalizm described in item #A7
of this web page is so strangely coinciding with
statements of the Biblical "Evangel of St. Matthew",
24:27, which amongst others informs, quote:
"For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west ...".
5.
Differentiate between our secular duties and obligations
towards God, give to God the correct kind of contribution,
and maintain a constructive balance between giving
to God and fulfilling our secular duties.
In other words, we should not allow that in
our lives any out of these two main components
(i.e. God or secular life) overpowers the other
one of them. Both these components must in
us complement and enrich each other - not compete
with each other. So we should NOT allow that the
spiritual matters overshadow or dominate our
secular life, not allow that our secular engagements
completely alienate us from connecting to God.
After all, the life is to live, and to implement what
God send us to the Earth to do with his assistance
and guidance. Furthermore, God requires that we
give to it a right kind of contribution. For example,
He does NOT want we give to Him our money,
possessions, or any other material goods. For God
material gifts are like these mice and frogs that my
cat Teecee used to bring to me, in order to make
friendly towards him this large and powerful animal
which he saw in me. It is God that gives to us material
goods so that we make out of them a right use in
our fulfilling our secular duties, not that we should
give them back to Him. God demands from us
immaterial contribution, such as voluntarily recognizing
His existence, recognizing His hand and work,
searching and studying His intentions, obeying His
commands, remembering about His requirements
in every secular matter in which we act, etc., etc.
In fact, through a clear showing the difference between
the manner of fulfilling the contribution towards God
in the Biblical "New Testament" (which describes
humanity which already is composed of "people"),
and a kind of gifts which inhabitants of the Earth
used to give to God in times of the "Old Testament"
(i.e. when humanity was still belonging to the world
of "intelligent animals"), God very intelligently and
illustratively let us know what kind of contribution
towards him He is asking for.
The information about the necessity to maintain
a constructive balance between giving contribution
to God and fulfilling our secular duties, is contained,
amongst others, in "Evangel of St. Luke", 20:25,
quote: "Render therefore unto Caesar the things
which be Caesar’s, and unto God the things which be God’s."
In turn the context in which the above verse was
repeated and stressed in three Evangels of
St. Luke", 20:25, Mark 10:25, and Matthew 19:24,
reveals to us very clearly, that God does NOT
wants material belongings from us, e.g. financial
donations, but wishes we give to him all these
non-material efforts and actions, which He
defined for us with the content of the Bible,
commandments of moral laws, configuration
of the moral field, etc., etc.,
and from understanding of which He made one
of our duties towards Him (or more strictly "Her" -
as explained in item #B7 from the web page
God).
Of course, the above are just a few first and
most vital "requirements of qualifying to the
category of people" contained in the Bible.
Similar requirements is more. But the goal
of this web page is NOT to discuss these.
For example God requires from people to
devote to building and lifting up, not to destruction
and pushing down. God orders to defend ourselves
when we are attacked, but it forbids aggressive
attacking. God orders to share with others, and
not just take everything for ourselves. Etc., etc.
If we would like to express all these requirements
and commandments of God with a single allegoric
statement, then we could state that God asks
from us everything that an ideal woman who loves
us very much would demand from us. As this
is explained in item #B7 of the web page about a
secular understanding of God,
this thinking components of God, which by the
Christianity is called "Holy Ghost", in fact is a
female.
The Bible warns us many times, that for all
those who do not obey commandments of
God, awaits not pleasurable consequences.
So we should NOT expect that if God gave
to someone a chance to become a human,
because he allowed to be born from human
parents, but that someone spurn and rejected
this chance, then God will still be generous
towards such someone. After all God has
the power and thousands of different possibilities
to execute from disobeying ones the warning
which he authorized in the Bible. For example,
only the simplest out of these possibilities is,
that for those who insist so much to remain
animals, God allows to be born again as
animals. Therefore, I personally feel obliged
to realize with the aid of these descriptions,
that - as Englishman say "God means
business". After all, God does NOT need to
worry that there will be NO creatures interested
to qualify into the category of people. Just only
on the Earth every second millions of existences
are coming to life, the level of intelligence of
which allows them to stand up in a queue to the
chance of becoming a human. For example, my cat
Teecee
is one of them.
But God created the physical world of a finite
volume. So He cannot non-selectively advance
to the honour of a person every out of these
millions and millions of creatures, and then
give an everlasting life to each person. The
God's justice is to be fulfilled if every creature
gets a chance from God of becoming
a human, and then the further fate of this creature
is to depend how this creature performs when
getting this chance. So God has reasons to make
very difficult the advancement from the status
of an "animal" to the status of a "human". No
wonder that in the Biblical Evangel of St. Mark,
10:25, is written - quote: "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God."
(A rich person typically practices the philosophy of
parasitism
which just gives to people the animal attributes.)
So it is not know neither "when" nor "if at all",
these ones from our fraternity who in the present
life lost already the chance to prove themselves
as "people", will obtain a next such a chance.
In fact such another chance they may get after
waiting in the queue for hundreds or even thousands
of years, or even do not get this chance ever
again. So it is better already now do everything
that the Bible encourages us to do, and in fact
put the effort which we can afford in order to
prove God already now that we deserve the
name a "human".
At the end of this item I would like to propose to
the reader a small verifying test. Namely, I propose
to check, whether according to requirements given
to us by God and clearly explained above from 1
to 5 of this item, in eyes of God the reader deserves
to be qualified to the category of humans, and to
receive privileges granted by God to humans,
or else he or she deserves only to be qualified to
the same category as "UFOnauts-serpents" - means
to "animals gifted with intelligence and human appearance",
and then receive the same treatment as animals.
Means, whether the reader: (1) recognizes the authority
of God, (2) gained the skill of recognizing the hand and
acts of God, (3) uses his body as an instrument to
accomplishing positive intellectual and spiritual
goals, but not opposite, etc., etc. Then I propose
to match similarly to the same criteria all these
close ones whom the reader loves the most.
Finally I propose to consider what in the reader's
opinion the reader should do with conclusions to
which he or she arrived in this test. Means, whether
in such a vital matter as the eternal future for
himself or herself and for his or her close ones,
the reader should leave the matter just on
checking, and then continue the sitting on
his own hands in matters for which God
requires actions, or rather should take actions
which are suggested by this test. After all,
we need to remember, that after publishing
formal scientific proofs for the existence of God,
the power, authority, and the actions of God
ceased to be just a matter of believes, and
become a scientific certainty. These God's
capabilities do not cease to be such a certainty
only because some intelligent animals in the
Bible called "serpents" spit on these proofs
the entire saliva that their venomous tangs
are able to generate.
Serpents-UFOnauts consider themselves to be
a kind "super-humans" which are positioned so
much higher above people from the planet Earth,
as much higher people from the Earth are positioned
above animals. Also at every occasion these
UFOnauts let us know about this their supposed
superiority. It seems to come easy to them. After all,
they stole time vehicles and telekinetic vehicles
from some other civilization. They also have a
capability to travel around entire Universe. Because of the
telekinetic flickering
they also can become invisible to human sight.
So they are very unhappy that the truth revealed
in the Bible states about them something completely
opposite. Namely that in eyes of God just they,
serpents-UFOnauts, are creatures inferior like
animals, while us, humans from the Earth, are
superior over them by the "humanitarianism"
of our attributes. Because totalizm disseminates
the knowledge about this truth that is so bitter
for UFOnauts, this dissemination provides one
more reason for which UFOnauts so viciously
try to destroy totalizm. After all, they do not like
when something reminds them the truth that in
eyes of God they are just animals provided
with human intelligence and with human shapes.
#F4.
Totalizm in the role of
a straighter of errors and deviations of all other sciences
(for example totalizm reveals a moral manner for gaining the
immortality,
means a moral way of defeating death and living forever):
Motto:
"Immortality
is NOT going to come from the advancement of medicine - as everyone seems
to believe, but from the creative technical thinking which allows people to build
time vehicles."
People who accepted the philosophy of
totalizm are gaining an extraordinary tool
which allows them to verify the truth, and
to repair errors or deviations, in practically
all other present sciences. This is because
findings of totalizm remove from eyes of
people the "blinkers" which previously
disallowed them to see the universe as
it really is.
An excellent illustration of the role of totalizm
as a straighter of errors, deviations, and
shortcomings of other sciences, is the simplest
and easiest path to our
immortality.
All people seem to believe, that the path to
immortality is through the advancement of medicine.
However, totalizm reveals to us that the only
morally acceptable way of defeating death
and gaining the access to an immortal life,
cannot use medical methods. The reason is
that medical manners of extending life
must be based on either copying or robbing
of components of life. However, both
copying and robbing are highly immoral
activities (this is why people established
"copyrights" and laws protecting us from
robbers.) Therefore, in order to live forever
it is necessary to build the technical device called the
time vehicle.
After all, time vehicles allow everyone to shift
back in time to years of his or her youth each
time after he or she reaches an old age or after
his or her body which refuses to work. As totalizm
explains this, the building of time vehicles is relatively
simple. In fact if other people started to help
me in accomplishing my goals soon after in
1985 I discovered how time works and how time
vehicles can be build, then until today, means
after around a quarter of century, I would already
build these time vehicles. After all, already then
I knew how to build the "heart" and the most vital
component of time vehicles, means the technical
device called the
Oscillatory Chamber of the third generation.
(This device is also described on the web page
eco_cars.htm - about zero emission cars of our future.)
Furthermore, since 1985 I know exactly how
time works and how technically we can shift time
back - for descriptions of this operation of time
and method of shifting time back see chapter
M from volume 11 of my
monograph [1/5],
or see the web page named
timevehicle.htm,
or the web page named
immortality.htm.
I am also able to indicate to everyone the easy for
verifying proof that time is really a software quantity,
and thus that it elapses in short jumps - means the proof
that time is exactly how my theories explain it to people.
(This easily verifiable proof is described in item #A1 of the web page
timevehicle.htm - about the work of time, about travelling in time, and about time vehicles,
and in item #D2 of the web page
god_proof.htm - about scientific proofs for the existence of God.)
The only thing that so-far I was unable to accomplish,
is the help of other people in my efforts to build time
vehicles. Most clearly my countrymen do NOT want
to live forever. With attitudes of other people towards
my discoveries and inventions seems to be like with
this donkey from the English proverb we can bring
a donkey to water, but we cannot make it drink.
On the other hand, without the help from other people,
means without a research job at an university, without
proper conditions to carry out scientific research
openly, without an access to research laboratories,
and without products of good prototyping facilities,
just by myself I am unable to build time vehicles e.g.
in the corner of my kitchen.
More about our chance for living forever is explained
on the web page
immortality.htm - about immortality, means how we could defeat death right now and begin to live forever.
Another good example, which illustrates the role of
totalizm as a straighter of errors and deviations of other
sciences, can be the matter of so-called "perpetual motion".
Namely, from the philosophical point of view, the only
difference between e.g. a "windmill" and a "perpetual
motion device", is the length of time in which the
propelling medium provides a steady energy supply
to a given device. So if there exists a "wind" which
blows continually, steadily, and strongly for, let's say,
one million years, then the "windmill" which such a
"wind" would propel, would become a "perpetual motion
device". Thus, from the point of view of any philosophy,
"perpetual motion devices" can be build - if we find
a propelling medium (e.g. a "wind") which provides
a steady energy supply continually for thousands
of years. But the discipline of thermodynamics claims
the exact opposite. It states that "perpetual motion
devices cannot work" at all, as their operation supposedly
would run against the statistic predictions which carry
the name of "laws of thermodynamics". So it would
be an interesting situation if philosophy proves to
thermodynamics that so-called "laws of thermodynamics"
are still incomplete because were NOT consulted
with philosophy. After all, various sciences know
"winds" that "blow" continually and steadily for
millions of years. To indicate here some examples
of such "winds", these include: the rotation of our
planet Earth, the motion of Moon around the Earth,
the magnetic field of the Earth, waves of a "cosmic
noise", various behaviours of elementary particles,
and many more. So if, for example, we construct a
"flywheel", which meets following easy-to-fulfil conditions:
(1) it has the so-called "momentum of inertia" larger
than its "friction torque", (2) it is perfectly balanced - so
that the gravitational field of the Earth does NOT
influence its angular orientation, and (3) it is so
assembled in a given location that the axis of rotation
of this flywheel is exactly parallel to the axis of the
Earth’s rotation; then such a flywheel should create
an everlasting motion in relationship to the Earth,
with the speed of one rotation per day (or more
strictly, this flywheel would remain motionless in
relationship to our solar system, while the Earth
would rotate around it once per each day). So such
a flywheel - if constructed and provided with an
appropriate gearbox linked to a pointer, could prove
empirically that philosophical principles are more
advanced than so-called "laws of thermodynamics".
More on the subject of the above "perpetual motion"
device is explained on the web page
free_energy.htm - about generators of free energy.
Of course, this item provides only two examples
from a huge ocean of new knowledge that opens
to our eyes after we begin to practice totalizm.
Other examples of this knowledge are described
on the totaliztic web page
about myself (Dr Eng. Jan Pajak).
Part #G:
Totalizm versus faith and religions:
#G1.
Explanation why totalizm is not colliding nor competing with anyone's religion:
One of reasons for
which some people could have reservations about implementing
findings of totalizm into their lives, is their thought of a possibility
that totalizm may collide or compete with their personal religion
(faith) which they are just preaching. Such reservations are
completely unjustified. This item explains why.
There is a
whole range of reasons for which totalizm does NOT collide
nor compete with any religion (faith) that exists on Earth.
Here are most vital out of these reasons:
(i) Totalizm
is a philosophy, not a religion. In turn with religions can
compete only another religion. But totalizm from the definition
cannot constitute a religion. After all, it is based on a unbiased
and secular knowledge, while religions are based on human
believes. As a philosophy totalizm cannot compete with religions -
as it belongs to a completely different category. Only in some
matters it tries to objectively define and extend statements
of religions on the basis of modern scientific knowledge that
was earned by humanity since times when these religions
were established.
(ii) Totalizm
set for itself the goal to bring closer believers of various religions.
The ambition of totalizm is making peace and bringing closer
various people and believers of different religions, not dividing
them or turning against themselves. However, if totalizm in any way
collide or compete with any religion, it would NOT be able to
bring together believers of this religion neither to totalizm, nor
to other religions. The method with the use of which totalizm
tries to bring together believers of various religions depends
on the scientific proving that all religions in fact pray to the same
God, means to the only God that exists in the entire universe.
(After all, totalizm proves scientifically that in the entire Universe
exists only one God.) Since in case of every religion God
remains the same, in fact each religion is only a different
manner of implementing of the same intention of serving
to this only God. Thus, all differences between subsequent
religions boil down to either different interpretations of how
people can serve this only God in the best possible manner,
and to incomplete understanding what this only God really
expects from people. With the aid of the secular and unbiased
research, totalizm brings together these different interpretations
as to how serve God in the best possible manner. Research
of totalizm disperses also existing misunderstandings
about the requirements that this single God imposes onto
people. In this way totalizm unifies the understanding
of commonness of goals of all religions on Earth. The same
it brings together believers of these different religions.
(iii) The important recommendation of totalizm
in religious matters is the "faith plus totalizm".
This means that totalizm recommends as it is
described in item #G2 below - namely that every
single inhabitant of Earth satisfies from totalizm
his or her needs for the knowledge about God,
while satisfies his or her religion-based emotional
and cultural needs through practicing the religion
(faith) of his or her ancestors. This is because
the religion satisfies one's needs which the scientific
discipline (such as totalizm) is unable to satisfy,
such as cultural needs resulting from the tradition,
and a whole range of emotional needs of a given
person, e.g. a need to participate in religious
celebration, the need to belong to specific culture
and nation, the need to cultivate specific traditions,
etc. Unfortunately, while present religions satisfy
emotional and cultural needs that exist in almost
every person, their outdated knowledge is unable
to satisfy the intellectual needs regarding God that
each modern person also have. But totalizm is able
to satisfy these intellectual needs with the most
modern knowledge about God which it managed
to accumulate. After all, totalizm developed secular,
unbiased, and very modern knowledge which allows
us to learn cognitively about God, to work out scientific
recipes for the moral and happy life, etc. In addition
every religion for sure is going to be more pleased
if these intellectual needs of people are satisfied by
totalizm - which promotes the existence of God and
morality, than they are satisfied by the present atheistic
orthodox science - which promotes turning out from
God and which does not recognise moral laws.
More about the important recommendation of totalizm
"faith plus totalizm" is explained in item #G2 below,
and also on a separate web page regarding
secular and scientific understanding of God.
The above reasons, and also several further of
them which are explained in the textbook of totalizm,
means in volumes 6 to 8 of
monograph [1/5],
reveal that practicing totalizm not only that does
NOT collide nor compete with someone's religious
practices, but actually enhances and extends
in this person the faith in God and the devotion to the religion of
his or her ancestors. After all, totalizm complements religions with
the reliable scientific knowledge about God which modern people
need to learn, but which the atheistic science does NOT want,
nor is able to provide to them.
#G2.
"Faith plus totalizm" - what benefits it brings:
People have hardwired in themselves a tendency
to impose onto other people their own manner
of acting. Therefore, we can find families and
homes in which someone strictly defined how
the toothpaste should be squeezed, or toilet
paper should be torn. There are already countries,
the legal system of which suppresses the old
truth "spare the rod and spoil the child" and
puts parents to prisons if these parents try to
use a belt or a rod to discipline their children -
for details see item #B5.1 from the web page named
will.htm.
We know for a long time religions which use
the force and oppression to impose to believers
of other religions the manner on which these
others supposed to pray to God. Not mentioning
the rivalry between ideologies, which to inhabitants
of other countries tries to impose a specific
political system.
The principle "faith plus totalizm" realises for the
area of religions this important goal of totalizm to
eliminate the imposing. (This principle is described
more comprehensively in item #J4 of the web page named
god.htm.)
This is because totalizm realises that every religion
satisfies a whole range of needs of their believers,
for example it: (1) provides reliable knowledge
about God, (2) it teaches how to live morally
and according to God's requirements, (3) it
satisfies their emotional needs of belonging
to a specific group of people, (4) satisfies their cultural
needs that are unique to these believers, and also
satisfies several further needs. On the other hand
totalizm is just a scientific discipline (philosophy)
which is able (1) provide more reliable and more
modern knowledge about God than the knowledge
offered by already outdated religions, and is able
(2) better than religions teach us how we should
live morally according to God's requirements. But
as a scientific discipline totalizm is unable to satisfy
these additional needs of people, such as emotional
or cultural need. This is why totalizm suggests this
principle called "faith plus totalizm". This principle
states, that much more current and modern knowledge
about God from the knowledge offered by already
outdated religions should be learned via totalizm and via the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
But emotional and cultural needs everyone should
satisfy through participating in rituals and celebrations
of the religion in which he or she was born, means
the religion which is practiced by his or her own parents,
brothers and sisters, friends, neighbours, tribesman, etc.
After all, the continuation of the religion of our ancestors satisfies
a number of emotional and cultural needs of every person.
Furthermore, forcing someone to change the religion usually
leads to a disappointment with God. This is because it replaces
the treasured from our childhood system of rituals and symbols
into a completely strange system of rituals and symbols.
This in turn leads to rebellions, aggression, and fights.
Part #H:
Strange "coincidents" concerning totalizm:
#H1.
Totalizm as a new phenomenon:
There is an interesting phenomenon taking
place in our midst. This is a birth and spreading
of a new, extremely moral, peaceful, constructive,
and progressive philosophy. It is called
totalizm.
(Notice that the name of this new moral philosophy is purposely
spelled with the letter
"z",
to make it distinct from another, old, immoral, aggressive,
destructive, and reactionary philosophy called "totalitarianism".
This old philosophy totalitarianism sometimes is abbreviated
wrongly to the shorter word "totalism", but spelled with
"s".)
To be more interesting, totalizm is not just another academic
creation, which is to pass without being noticed by mere mortals.
It is a philosophy of everyday living for normal human beings
who keep their feet firmly on the ground. It already turned around lives
of many people, and the number of its adherers is growing rapidly
every day. In fact, it can already be noticed, that presently totalizm
is the most dynamic and the widest spreading philosophy from all
new philosophies developed since the beginning of 20th century.
In July 2003 I completed a detailed (and laborious) analyses of
counters of visits to all web pages of totalizm. It turned out, that
already then around 200 people were downloading monographs
on totalizm from all totaliztic web sites each day. This
gives an idea about the dynamics of this philosophy. By now
this number probably increased even more. Only that this
philosophy is practiced by everyone in privacy, without
public manifestation of own views and behaviours. Thus,
the increase in numbers of adherers of it, so-far do not
hit public eyes.
#H2.
On what principle totalizm works:
Motto:
Moral doing good deeds is difficult and effort consuming, because requires climbing uphill in the moral field.
Immoral doing evil deeds is easy and effortless, because depends on sliding downhill in the moral field.
Our physics explained to us quite well, why
e.g. climbing stairs is so difficult and so
effort consuming. According to laws described
by physics, each time we climb stairs,
we need to move uphill in the invisible
field called "gravity". Thus the work of
overcoming the action of this field, is the
source of our effort and difficulties. But
our science so-far did not explain exactly
why doing moral things is so difficult,
and why it also consumes so much
human effort. (For example, consider
how difficult is to tell truth. After all, telling
truth is the essence of every moral
behaviour.) This answer provides only
the new philosophy called
totalizm.
According to totalizm, the reason why doing
moral things always consumes a lot of
our effort, is exactly the same as the
reason why climbing stairs is consuming
a lot of energy - namely the presence of
an invisible field. Totalizm states that apart
from the invisible for humans gravity field,
the entire physical world is also permeated
by another kind of invisible primary field
very similar to gravity. Totalizm calls it the
"moral field".
This invisible moral field causes, that every
action that we take in our lives, depends either
on climbing uphill in this field (and thus such
action is moral),
or on sliding downhill in this moral field (and
then such action is immoral).
Therefore the fact that there is such thing as
this "moral field", causes that everything that
we do has a definite moral polarity - means
is either moral or immoral as it climbs either
uphill or downhill in this moral field. Thus,
because doing moral things (e.g. saying the
truth), always shifts us uphill in this invisible
moral field, it must also come to us equally
laboriously, as every other climbing uphill
in any other invisible field, e.g. in gravity.
At this point it is worth noting that the "getting
to know the rules and laws governing over morality"
is also a highly moral activity. As such, it must
climb uphill in the moral field, while persons learning
principles of highly moral life need to put a lot of
effort into this learning. This is why only a few people
are trying to learn totalizm, while so many people
prefer to practice the punishable by God
"philosophy of parasitism".
In spite that the gravity field and the moral field,
both are invisible to the eye primary fields, there
are significant differences between both of them.
Although these differences are discussed thoroughly
in other publications of totalizm - e.g. see item
#J1 and "Fig. #I1" from the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm,
for the scientific reliability let us mention here at
least some most important their examples. So
here are more significant amongst such differences:
(1)
What they interact with. The gravitational field only
affects the physical objects, while climbing uphill in it
requires putting into it a physical effort. But moral field
also affects non-physical objects, e.g. mind, intentions,
feelings, etc., while climbing uphill in it requires putting
at least mental (intellectual) effort, while often all kinds
of efforts, i.e. mental, emotional, and physical.
(2)
Intelligence. Behind the operation of moral field hides
exactly the same superior intelligence that created the entire
physical world, and now with an iron hand manages the
operation of the physical world (i.e. hides God Himself) -
for examples see item #N3 from the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.
Therefore, if one carefully examines the consequences
of moral field action, then clearly hits our eyes the supremely
intelligent goals of this action. For example: (2a) every
action of the moral field is so selected, that it is maximally
educational to all those people who are affected by the
consequences of this field action. (2b) The strength of each
of the field's action is carefully so chosen that it is proportional
to the number of people "m" who in the future will be affected
by consequences of given human work. (2c) In every
action of moral field there are contained also numerous
discreet hints from God addressed to the person carrying
out a particular human work - e.g. a hint as to whether
the goals of this human work is compatible with long-term
plans of God. (For example, in the initial part, in "1", and
in the last paragraph from item #N2 on the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm,
as well as in (5) from item #L3 of that web page, described
is my discovery that if a morally correct our work is contrary
to the long-term plans of God, and thus in spite of the moral
intentions of this work still the completion of it needs to fail,
then the resistance of moral field that is encountered in
implementation of this work essentially is of the divine
origin - e.g. this resistance is composed of rains, tornadoes,
lack of resources, the non-existence of something necessary,
breakups, illness, etc. If, however, the success of a given
work lies in God's long-term plans, only that the moral character
of this work must be hardened with a short-term resistance
of the moral field, then the resistance that is encountered
is mainly of a human origin - e.g. it is a refusal from superiors,
prohibitions, removal from a job, taunting, someone's setting
us up, etc.).
(3)
Differences between a short-term and a long-term action.
In contrast to gravity - which all the time works in almost
the same way, in the short-term
moral field runs completely opposite to its long-term
action. For example, in the short-term action
(i.e. that one which manifests itself mainly during a period
of time in which we make a given specific acting) the moral
field forms a resistance which obstructs achieving everything
that is moral (i.e. it makes an impression as if it "punishes"
the moral behaviour), but it helps in achieving everything
that is immoral (i.e. it makes an impression as if it "rewards"
immoral acting). But in the long-term effects the moral field
is exactly opposite to its own short-term action - i.e. in
long-term moral field "rewards" the moral behaviours of
people and "punishes" immoral behaviours - as this is
graphically illustrated in "Fig. #I1" from the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.
Notice here that one amongst
numerous long-term punishments for immoral behaviour,
is the complete invalidation of every benefit that in
a short-term work of moral mechanisms someone
previously achieved as a result of an immoral acting,
combined with the simultaneous escalation of problems
for solving of which a given immoral behaviour was
oryginally carried out - for details see e.g.
items #C4.2.1 and #C4.2 from the web page named
morals.htm.
Excellent examples of invalidation of short-term
benefits of immoral acting and the escalation of
problems that a given immoral acting supposed
to solve, are consequences of immoral implementaion
of pesticides, antibiotics, and the theory of relativity
to the common use - described in item #J1 from
the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.
(4)
The superiority in relation to all other moral values and
mechanisms. Moral field governs practically over
everything. For example, in abovementioned item #J1
from my web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm,
I explained that in the long-term work the moral field
invalidates everything that one accomplishes in the
short-term as a result of immoral acting. Furthermore,
the moral field makes sure that
the true long-term benefits bring only activities which
are agreeable with moral criteria (i.e. activities which
are pedantically moral). Numerous
examples of consequences of the long-term action
of moral field are provided e.g. in the sixth paragraph
(#B6) from "part B" of my web page named
p_instruction.htm.
(5)
The course of both fields. Both of these fields run
differently. Thus, in some situations, e.g. the road uphill
in the gravity field can be simultaneously the way downhill
in the moral field.
Of course, from physics we already know that
whenever there is a field, there are also laws which
govern the motion in this field. Therefore totalizm
discovered, that the existence of the invisible
moral field is also the reason for a new type
of laws to prevail in the universe. These new
laws remained unknown to us until now.
Because their action depends on the
defining of principles which govern the
motion of our actions in relationship to the
moral field, totalizm calls this new type of
laws with the name
moral laws.
Moral laws are so designed, that everything
that is moral represents obeying these laws,
whereas everything that is immoral represents
disobedience of these laws. This makes
practicing totalizm very easy. All what is required
to practice totalizm, and to harvest plentiful
"rewards" that practicing this philosophy opens
for people, is to pedantically obey moral laws.
To make this practicing of totalizm even easier,
every person has a "build in" organ, which is
an encyclopaedia of moral laws. This organ
is popularly called
conscience.
Therefore many so-called "intuitive totalizts"
practice totalizm without actually realising it,
simply because they obey whispers of their
own organ of conscience. Perhaps even you,
the reader, belong to the group of "intuitive totalizts",
simply because you do in your life whatever
your conscience tells you to do, means you
practice morality and peace, always try to
tell truth whenever you can, be honest, helpful,
trustworthy, etc. (i.e. do NOT lie, steal, fight,
harm, kill, etc.).
In spite that the gravity field and moral field are
both invisible to human sight, there are significant
differences between these two. For example,
the gravity field acts solely on physical objects,
thus the climbing uphill in it requires giving out a
physical effort. On the other hand, moral field
acts also on non-physical objects, e.g. on
thoughts, intentions, feelings, etc. Thus the climbing
uphill in moral field requires putting also the mental
(intellectual) effort. Furthermore, both these fields
run differently. Thus in some life situations e.g.
the path uphill in the gravity field may
simultaneously be a path downhill in the moral field.
The most vital attribute of moral laws is that they
have rewards
and punishments
written into their operation. Therefore each time
we are obeying moral laws in our actions - we
are lavishly rewarded for this obeying. In turn
each time we break moral laws - we are severely
punished for this breaking. Unfortunately for
people, these rewards (and also punishments)
that result from the action of moral laws NEVER
take the form of material goods (e.g. the influx
of money). They always are non-material, i.e.
take the form for example of the feeling of
happiness, the satisfaction of self-fulfilment,
peace of mind, lack of stress, finding a loved
partner, loving and polite children, nice neighbours,
lack of problems at work and in life, etc. -
for more information about attributes of these
"rewards" and "punishments" see item #B2.1
of the web page
mozajski_uk.htm
or see subsection NG5.1.1 from volume 12 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
If we e.g. try to define what is a "reward" in God's
eyes, then it would turn out that "as an 'reward'
God considers allowing the rewarded person to
lead uninterrupted life deprived of 'punishments'
which God always sends to immoral people".
Therefore the majority of people do NOT notice the
existence of such rewards. After all, in the present times
by "rewards" people understand almost exclusively
materialistic gains, such as an influx of money,
an access to sensual pleasures, a power over
other people, etc. But these ones were intentionally
excluded from the pool of rewards that are granted
automatically just because of the fulfilment of
moral laws. (Of course, we can still gain these
materialistic rewards through a goal-oriented moral
work aimed at accomplishing them.) It is because people started
to disobey moral laws lately on an ever increasing
scale, that the life on Earth is starting to be so
difficult and so full of suffering. Of course, in
order to intentionally obey moral laws, one needs
to actually know that there is such thing as these
laws. Therefore totalizm informs people about the
existence of moral laws and teaches ways how
we can obey these laws in a methodical manner.
People who cognitively learn about moral laws
and obey them methodically, are called
"formal totalizts". Otherwise then
"intuitive totalizts" who obey moral laws just
by listening to whispers of their conscience,
such "formal totalizts" learned cognitively
why and what they are doing, so they are
not moral just by intuition and conscience,
but also by a methodical acting. This in turn
allows them to intensify countless benefits
which they harvest from living a moral,
peaceful, and productive life.
Totalizm is already quite a successful philosophy.
This can be noticed from the number of references
which indicate totalizm in the Internet - e.g.
check the keyword "totalizm" in www.google.com.
This happens in spite that it also has a lot of
enemies. Actually from my experience to-date
it appears, that everyone who encountered
totalizm and took a time to find out what exactly
it is, either starts to love it, or starts to hate it.
However, even that there are numerous individuals
who do not appreciate this philosophy, still it
managed to establish itself, and there is a lot
of people in the world who already practice it
voluntarily on everyday basis. Actually, at this
moment of time totalizm seems to be the most
successful out of all new philosophies created
and disseminated in 20th century, and the only
new philosophy that appeals to "an average
person from a street".
#H3.
Shockingly symbolic fate of totalizm:
Motto:
"Totalizm spans our planet like the lightning which flashes across the whole sky from the east to the west."
By a strange turn of fate, everything about
this new, peaceful, moral, and progressive
philosophy of totalizm becomes highly symbolic.
For example, because of various forms of
subtle persecution that both, totalizm and
the creator of this philosophy seem to
experience almost continually, descriptions
of totalizm needed to be prepared mainly
in the most Eastern Islamic country of the
World (i.e. in Malaysia). Then they were
published in the most Eastern Christian
country of the World (i.e. in New Zealand).
Then they were forwarded with the speed of light
through Internet connections from the far East to
the far West, means to internet servers located
in the most Western large country in the World
(i.e. in the USA). From internet servers in the
USA these monographs are distributed via
Internet to interested people in the entire world.
(For further details on the extraordinary history
of totalizm, see subsection W4 from volume 18
of the newest
monograph [1/5]
or from subsection A4 in volume 1 of an older
monograph [1/4]
- both in English, or see subsection F1 from
volume 5 of even the older
monograph [8]
- also in English.)
So what is so special
about this new, moral, peaceful, and progressive philosophy,
which spans the entire planet Earth like a lightning.
Well, have a look at this web site to find it out!
Part #I:
The art and totalizm:
#I1.
Totalizm is the subject of creative art:
There is already a significant amount of artistic
creativity, the subject of which is totalizm. In
this part of the web page I am going to show
at least some most noticeable examples of it.
#I2.
The poem about totalizm:
Here is a poem concerning totalizm, dated
on December 2010. The author of it, and
the purpose, are coded into the poem, so
that they do NOT need explanation.
On this most beautiful Holiday
Marius hopes, that Professor Pajak is okay,
So he has an intention
To bring to Professor's attention,
That he wishes him a gorgeous Christmas Eve
And all the meals as good, as you can conceive.
And, in general, the most of joy
Let soon all the Professor's inventions truly start to deploy,
Beginning from the upcoming year.
Let him successfully put together first parts of the gear,
And when the Bethlehem Star will start to shine,
We shall believe, that the Magnocraft will fly just fine,
For on whatever human mind can theorize
It also is surely possible to realize.
And when the Magnocraft will go for first flight,
It will forever broaden all the humanity sight.
The people will discover true happiness, those great and small,
When Totalizm will triumph, all in all.
The above poem was written spontaneously by
its author, and supposed to be a "single-use poem"
(as a form of Christmas wishes). But if one analyses
the quality and actuality it displays, and the point it
makes, in fact it levels with poems of professional poets.
#I3.
Paintings, banners, posters, and photographs that concern totalizm:
On several totaliztic web pages I already
published various "visual art" on the subject
of totalizm and my person. This creative art
until today is expressed on many different
ways. Below I am illustrating at least most
noticeable out of these. But please bear in
mind that NOT all examples, links to which
I am providing below, will be accessible on every
web site (server) of totalizm. So in order to
see them all, probably surfing through several
addresses from the "Menu 3" will be needed.
Paintings were first forms of art that addressed
topics included into the area of interests of totalizm.
Examples of these paintings the reader can see
e.g. on "Fig. #B3" from the web page
evil.htm -
(click on this (green) link to see it here),
or on "Painting 1" from the web page named
antichrist.htm -
(click on this (green) link to see it here).
Another art form devoted to totalizm and to my
person, are posters and modifications of photographs.
Several examples of these I already presented
on various web pages, for example see:
(1) The modification of the monument
to four presidents, shown amongst others in "Fig. #J3"
from the web page named
god_proof.htm(click on this (green) link to see it here).
(2) Modification of the poster for
the film "I, Robot" shown in "Fig. #1" from web page
wszewilki_2006.htm -
(click on this (green) link to see it here).
The film "I, Robot" itself, is discussed in item
#E1.1 from the totaliztic web page
will.htm;
(3) The modification of the photograph
"levitating Jan Pajak", shown in "Fig. #M1" from the
web page named
telekinesis.htm -
(click on this (green) link to see it here).
(4) The modification of the photograph
"Jan Pajak musician", shown in "Fig. A4" from volume
1 of my newest
monograph [1/5].
Here is another example of the banner which
someone anonymous prepared laboriously on
the subject of "thorny path of totalizm" to hearts
and minds of people:
Fig. #I1. The banner "Long life and win for totalizm!" - anonymous author.
#I4.
Songs about totalizm:
Already a long time ago I was informed, that
various ambitious artists test their skills, talents,
and sharpnesses of pens, through composing
songs about totalizm and about the author of
this moral philosophy. But for a long time I had
no opportunity to come across such a song.
Only on 7th March 2014 looking through the
Internet I accidentally encountered the Polish song entitled
"Dr Jan Pajak is our friend"
(in Polish: "Dr Jan Pajak to nasz przyjaciel")
which at that time could be listened to (for free) at the address:
if only the listener had the sufficient patience to
persevere through a long advertisement that was
shown before that song.
I must admit here, that according to my taste the song
is quite cute. Pity that very talented in an obvious
manner authors of this song have NOT recorded
it on a video and place it in the YouTube. I am
ready to bet that in such a case it would become
an international hit.
After this first discovery of the above song, I started
to intentionally search through the Internet to check
the quality of other similar musical creations, the
existence of which was rumoured to me previously.
In fact I managed to find several further such songs
devoted to myself (in this number one hymn about the
village of Wszewilki
in which I was born), and I also found the post on
a forum, in which some anonymous author brags
about uploading to Internet as many as 21 similar musical
creations. Unfortunately, the artistic quality of these
other songs do NOT qualify them to be recommended
here for listening. But a curiosity and a puzzle which
hit me in them, is that each song is sung by a different
person - including women. So if their mysterious creator
(or creators) do NOT have some magical powers, then
in an obvious manner he (or they) needed to employ a large
team of people for preparing these songs. So who to hell,
and why,
was prepared to contribute so much effort, costs,
work and organization, to anonymously publish in
Internet several funny or sarcastic songs about
my research and myself, in spite that numerous
individuals for long time try to convince readers
of Internet, that supposedly all my discoveries,
theories, philosophies and inventions are wrong
and unworthy of reading? Another mystery is
why the significant sums of money
which this anonymous someone for sure
needed to spend on so professionally
prepared funny songs about myself (which songs
probably only sparse people are to hear), instead
of designating such money to finance my chronically
underfinanced scientific research and to implement
my inventions?
#I5.
Playlists with totaliztic songs and music:
One can say also that there are such things
as playlists of "totaliztic songs and music".
These can be defined as follows:
"playlists of totaliztic
songs and music are those ones, which are
characterized by compliance with the criteria
of morality, which transmit to a listener a
particular kind of moral energy popularly
known as the "umf", "wow", or "X factor",
which positively inspire the listener and
do NOT generate in him/her negative side
effects, and which are tuned into the musical
taste of the listener". Examples
of first "playlists" with totaliztic video-songs
suited to my musical taste, while designed
to be played with a single click on "smart"
TVs by Korean company "LG", and also on
PC computers, the reader can view from the web page named
p_e.htm.
In turn, while viewing that first web page, the
reader can click on links to further totaliztic
"playlists", which that first one points out.
Only that to make these "playlists" to work OK
on PC computerss, they should be run under
the browser named "Google Chrome" (version 2011,
or later). Also the smooth playing of these videos
is helped by a relatively fast Internet. Each my
totaliztic playlist has in its header a green link
to the instruction explaining how to use it.
Furthermore, descriptions of history of first
my totaliztic "playlist" the reader can find
in item #L2 from the web page named
wszewilki_uk.htm
and in the caption under "Fig. #D1" from the web page named
wszewilki_jutra_uk.htm.
Part #J:
To conclude:
#J1.
There is much more going on for totalizm:
As the previous descriptions illustrated
this, totalizm is a name assigned to a new,
dynamic, and highly progressive philosophy of everyday living, the principles of which
are based on such scientific and measurable ideas as: the motion of uphill
or downhill in the moral field, the obedience or disobedience of moral laws,
and the accumulation or dispersion of moral energy. This web page is not
the only web site which explains principles of totalizm and which allows
to download textbooks about this philosophy. Other web pages on totalizm
can be found, if one checks with any search engine (e.g. with google.com)
for key words
totalizm, Dr Jan Pajak.
Examples of these which are worth reviewing
include, amongst others, totaliztic web pages
god.htm - about the secular and scientific understanding of God,
god_proof.htm - about scientific proofs for the existence of God, or
parasitism.htm - about the morally decadent philosophy of parasitism.
It is worth to mention, that there is already a lot
of people who actually practice this highly progressive
and rewarding philosophy in their everyday lives.
#J2.
About the author:
In the legal sense the author of totalizm is
me, i.e. Dr Jan Pajak. But please notice
that I personally do NOT consider myself
to be the person who "invented" or "developed"
totalizm - similarly as none of physicists
has the right to claim that he or she invented
or developed physics. I am only the first
scientist on Earth, who started to research
and who described systematically the true
laws and true rules which govern the morality
and intelligent life in the universe. If we use
again the analogy to physicists, although
none physicist has the right to claim that
invented or developed physics, many of
them can state that they developed a
textbook of physics. I just consider myself
to be the first researcher on Earth, who
developed the scientific textbook of totalizm.
This web page is a brief summary of such
a first textbook of totalizm. (The textbook
itself, or more strictly all three generations
of it, is described and linked in item #A4 above.)
In case someone has possible comments or
questions connected with the content of this web
page, he or she can direct these at my email
addresses. An access to current email
addresses and contact details which I use
at present, is provided in item #J5 below.
Fig. #J1. Myself, means Dr Eng. Jan Pajak -
while for the duration of 1992 to 1998 and
2007: Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
On the above my most favourite photograph, I
am shown on the background of beautiful New
Zealand landscape at the age of 40 - i.e. when
I still had almost all hair. However, my most
recent appearance shows the passport photo
from "Fig. #J2" below, as well as some images
from the film described in item #J9 below. In
turn photographs that illustrate how my appearance
kept changing during 70 years and in a range
of different periods of my life to-date, are
shown in "Fig. #1" from the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm.
By education I am a Mechanical Engineer with
the publicly defended degree of a Doctor of
Technical Sciences. However, in my latest
profession, which I practiced until 2005,
and then repeated for 10 months in 2007,
I lectured computer sciences and
information technology. I specialised
mainly in Software Engineering, Web
Technology and in Information Processing
(using the Web Technology). But my
hobby research, carried out until today
in my private time and on my private
cost, amongst others, includes development
of the new, moral, peaceful, constructive,
and uplifting philosophy of
totalizm
which is based on the operation of moral
field, moral laws, moral energy, and karma.
For more details about my life, research, and
work, it is worth to have a look at web pages
about me (i.e. Dr Jan Pajak), or
secular and scientific view of God,
listed in "Menu 1" or
"Menu 2".
One can also read subsection A4 from volume 1 of
monograph [1/5],
free copies of which are available, amongst
others, also via this web page.
#J3.
How with the web page named
"skorowidz_links.htm"
one can find totaliztic descriptions
of topics in which he is interested:
A whole array of topics equally interesting
as these from the above web page, is also
discussed from the angle that is unique to
the philosophy of totalizm. All these related
topics can be found and identified with the use of
content index
prepared especially to make easier finding
these web pages and topics. The name "index"
means a list of "key words" usually provided
at the end of textbooks, which allows to find
fast the description or the topic in which we
are interested. My web pages also has such
a content "index" - only that it is additionally
supplied in green
links
which after "clicking" at them with a mouse
immediately open the web page with the topic
that interest the reader. This content "index"
is provided on the web page named
skorowidz_links.htm.
It can be called from the "organising" part of
"Menu 1" of every totaliztic web page. I would
recommend to look at it and to begin using it
systematically - after all it brings closer hundreds
of totaliztic topics which can be of interest to
everyone.
#J4.
I would suggest to return periodically to this web page in order to check further progress in research and development of totalizm:
The thorough knowledge of
totalizm
presented on this web page, is immensely
vital for our lives. After all, depending
how well we learn this philosophy, this
is going to reflect on how moral, and
thus also how happy and fulfilled our
lives will be. This is the reason why I
created the web page that summarises
totalizm.
However, accomplishing a progress
in our knowledge of totalizm places
a requirement that I continually advance
research on it. Therefore, even at present
I carry out various experiments aimed at
determining further information about moral
laws, karma, etc. Results of this research are
to be published as soon as they are available
in the final form. Therefore the development
of this web page cannot be considered to be
completely finished, but must be carried out
continually. In future this web page will be
periodically updated, improved and
extended, as soon as any new information
becomes available and I finish verifying it.
So I am inviting to visit this web page again
at some stage in future, in order to check
what new becomes known to us regarding
totalizm, moral laws, moral field, karma, etc.
It is also worth to check periodically blogs
of totalizm some of which operate already
since April 2005, means since the time when
Internet discussion lists of totalizm experienced
a massive sabotage and needed to be replaced
with blogs. Blogs of totalizm are available under
several address, e.g.:
totalizm.wordpress.com,
and
totalizm.blox.pl/html.
(Notice, however, that all these addresses hold
mirror copies of the same posts with the same
content of messages, and that public discussions
on topics presented on these blogs are NOT carried
out on them, but on Google discussion groups from
item #J6 below.) After all, on blogs of totalizm many
matters discussed on this web page are also explained
with additional details written as new events unveil
before our eyes. Furthermore, these blogs contain
links to most recently updated web pages of totalizm.
Readers who wished to discuss any topic
addressed on this web page, or on any
other web pages of totalizm, should be
interested to know that these topics were
discussed at a whole array of threads
from Google discussion groups. Topics
and addresses of these threads are listed
in item #A2 and #E2 from anotyher my web page named
faq.htm.
I should also add, that from the beginning of
my work on totalizm and on other topics linked
to totalizm, every new topic which I am researching
I try to expose to a public discussion. I count
on receiving feedback. But because the official
science and the majority of scientists turned
their backs to whatever I am researching,
for the lack of scientific channels of receiving
this feedback I was forced to discuss these
topics in Internet. Unfortunately it introduces
serious drawbacks. E.g., for strange reasons -
which I also try to investigate, these Internet
discussions in the majority of cases occur
between some individuals which are well masked
and clearly feel safe behind the screen of their
anonymity. These individuals transformed recently
Internet discussions into kinds of verbal matches
the participants of which are competing in
throwing mud and spitting at every constructive
idea. This shocking phenomenon of abusing
and spitting instead of communicating
and discussing, is lately so widely spread,
that it is even discussed in newspapers -
e.g. see the article "Excuse me, could we
please be a bit more polite", from page B3
of the New Zealand newspaper
Weekend Herald,
issue dated on Saturday, January 3, 2009.
In spite of this escalation of the internet culture
of verbal abuse, for the lack of other channels
of gaining feedback regarding topics which
I investigate, I still try to expose each topic
researched to such Internet discussion. After
all, between abuses and personal attacks,
sometimes appear also single constructive
voices in the discussion which contribute
a new quality to a given topic. Therefore,
still is worth to scan these discussions,
seeking in them these rational and constructive
comments.
Current email addresses to the author of
this web page, i.e. officially to
Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
while courteously to Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak,
at which readers can post possible comments,
opinions, descriptions, or information which in
their opinion I should learn, are provided on the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm
(for its version in the HTML language), or the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.pdf
(for the version of the web page "pajak_jan_uk.pdf"
in safe PDF format - which safe PDF versions
of further web pages by the author can also be
downloaded via links from item #B1 of the web page named
text_11.htm).
Note, however, that the author does NOT reply
to emails from readers/people whom he does
NOT know already from his previous contacts.
The author's right for the use of courteous
title of "Professor" stems from the custom that
"with professors is like with generals", namely
when someone is
once a professor, than he or she courteously
remains a professor forever. In
turn the author of this web page was a professor
at 4 different universities, i.e. at 3 of them,
from 1 September 1992 untill 31 October 1998,
as an "Associate Professor" from English-based
educational system, while on one university as
a (Full) "Professor" (since 1 March 2007 till
31 December 2007 - means at the last place
of employment in his professional life).
However, please notice that because of my
rather chronic lack of time, I reluctantly
reply to emails which contain JUST time
consuming requests, while simultaneously
they document a complete ignorance of their
author in the topic area which I am researching.
This web page is also available in the form
of a brochure marked [11], which
is prepared in "PDF" ("Portable Document
Format") - currently considered to be the
most safe amongst all internet formats, as
normally viruses cannot cling to PDF. This
clear brochure is ready both, for printing,
as well as for reading from a computer
screen. It also has all its
green links
still active. Thus, if it is read from the computer
screen connected to internet, then after clicking
onto these green links, the linked web pages
and illustrations will open. Unfortunately, because
the volume of it is around a double of the volume
of web page which this brochure publishes,
the memory limitations on a significant number
of free servers which I use, do NOT allow to
offer it from them (so if it does NOT download
from this address, because it is NOT available
on this server, then you should click onto any
other address from
Menu 3,
and then check whether in there it is available).
In order to open this brochure (and/or download
it to own computer), it suffices to either click on
the following green link
or to open from any totaliztic web site the
PDF file named as in the above green link.
If the reader wishes to check, whether some other
totaliztic web page which he or she just is studying,
is also available in the form of such PDF brochure,
then should check whether it is listed amongst links
from "part #B" of the web page named
text_11.htm.
This is because links from there indicate all totaliztic
web pages, which are already published as such
brochures from series [11] in PDF format.
I wish you a fruitful reading!
#J9.
I am inviting you to watch an excellent, 35 minute long film
which complements and extends the content of this web page:
Motto:
"Seeing is believing."
All people interested in the content of this web
page, or interested in the futuristic discoveries
and inventions, are invited to watch the approximately
35 minute long free film produced by Dominik
Myrcik and entitled "Dr Jan Pajak portfolio".
As many as three language versions of the film
are already available on
www.youtube.com
since 5 May 2016 at the following addresses:
the English version on
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXr2OzVsMp4,
the Polish language version on
www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3MuZec4jGM,
while the German version on
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RX-FwUXOs98.
You can also run it from my web page named
djp.htm,
which provides links to all videos in production of
which I participated in person.
Simultaneously detailed descriptions of the content
of this film are available in "part #B" (especially in
items #B1 and #B2) of the devoted exclusively to
this film my web page named
portfolio.htm,
while short (this) summary of those descriptions
also contain: item #H1 from my web page named
pajak_for_mp_2017.htm,
item #K7 from my web page named
prophecies.htm,
and item #L5 from my web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm.
From that autobiographical web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm
readers can also learn descriptively further details
on the results of my research and on the course
of my life, which are to extend and complement
the information presented visually in the film discussed here.
Of course, to run and to watch this excellent film
does NOT require to remember nor to copy the
above links, but just suffices that to the separate
searching window which shows up in the top
part of each
www.youtube.com
web page one enters the title of this film, used
as searching keywords - i.e. one enters the title
"Dr Jan Pajak portfolio" (but typed without quotes).
The film "Dr Jan Pająk portfolio" can be viewed
on almost every device with a screen connected
to the Internet and with access to
YouTube
(including on PCs). Hence, I would recommend
to watch it several times, including pre-watching
(first time and fast) on the screen of your home
computer. In turn after such preliminary learning
of what this film shows, you can better understand
and appreciate its detailed descriptions from this
web page. Thus, soon after that first viewing, I
would recommend to read the film's descriptions
from selected items of "part #B" of this
web page. In the end, i.e. after learning descriptions
in which we are interested, it is worth to see the
film again, this time seeing it in more detailed way and with
greater understanding.
For this repeated, detailed viewing of the film I
would recommend to use a large screen of the
modern TV - e.g. in own home, or in home of
your family or friends. (Of course, if the reader
has such a TV readily available, then he/she can watch
this film in TV already for the first, initial time.) After all,
if the reader wishes to experience and appreciate
the artistry of the images and sounds, as well as
learn details of its story, and wonderfully designed
and constructed its images and animations, then
it is best to see it just on a big screen of a modern
TV. Such a modern TV is to fully emphasize its
qualitative features, such as high definition (HD),
high quality (HQ), and excellent colors and sounds.
Hence, the best for watching it would be a so-called
"smart" TV which, by definition, has a direct connection
with the Internet (I watch it on my 42-inch "smart"
TV from LG company – i.e. the same one, for which I programmed
my "playlists", for example the "playlist" available at
www.pajak.org.nz/p_12fb.htm),
or would be a TV that is connected to a computer,
and that computer is in turn connected to the Internet.
The film "Dr Jan Pajak portfolio" in a very interesting,
lively and eloquent manner documents, animates and
explains these ones among the most important results
of my research and inventiveness, which should be of
interest to almost everyone. For example, it discusses,
among others, the quickly incoming
mass extinction of our
civilization, that the most of people alive
currently on Earth will soon have the dubious privilege
of personal experience on themselves - if in the
meantime the humanity will NOT try to implement
in real life those NOT violating moral criteria future
technical devices which are described in the film
discussed here. The reasons for the scenario of this
mass extinction of people I described in more detail,
among others, in items #H1 to #H3 from my web page named
prophecies.htm.
Moreover, the fact that this mass extinction is already
coming, independently from me is noticing a growing
number of people open to the truth. After all, it is enough
to carefully look out the window today, to note that
we are like passengers in a speeding train, which
rushes along the tracks that are ending to an already
visible cliff, but the pleadings of which passengers
directed to the engine drivers that control the train
go onto deaf ears. My personal report on the
progress of humanity in approaching towards this
mass extinction, the reader can find e.g. in items
#T1 to #T8 from my web page named
solar.htm,
in items #A1 to #A5 of the web page named
cooking.htm,
as well as in pages that I am pointing above in items
#G1, #F2, #E3 and #A1 from my web page named
pajak_for_mp_2017.htm.
The film discussed here is really designed and
produced superbly (after all, its production took
half a year of work and lasted since November
2015 till May 2016). Thus, although those fierce
enemies and critics, many of which my discoveries
and scientific achievements still have, probably
immediately accuse me here of bias, I believe
that it is the best film presenting anyone's scientific
achievements which so far has been made and
placed on YouTube - if anyone believes otherwise
then I challenge him or her to indicate to us any
better movie of this type. In fact, I consider it to
be a huge honour and pleasure for me, that so
perfect film shows the most significant "milestones"
of my current scientific achievements. I could
NOT get a more precious gift to commemorate
the occasion of my 70th birthday, than this film is!
What makes me particularly happy is that this film
was designed, animated and produced by a Polish
person, or more specifically by an Upper Silesian.
In this way, it also proves how talented and perfectionist
are those people originating from Poland. So it cannot
surprise us the saying, which I described in item #E1.1
from my web page named
telepathy.htm,
for some time disseminated in England and
stating something along the lines "hire a Polish
emigrant, and he will complete a given job four times
faster and for only about one-fourth of the price of an
English professional". What a pity that all this talent,
knowledge and capabilities of people born and educated
in Poland are now serving for other nations. Hopefully,
my efforts described (in Polish), amongst others, on the web page
drowning in corruptionpajak.org.nz/pajak_dla_prezydentury_2020.htm
are to redirect to the progress of Poland these all Polish
intellectual accomplishments derived from Poland, and
thus over time will result in the restoration to Poland of
its former moral power, size, prosperity and strength
proverbially inspiring other nations from a sea to a sea.
Images of the discussed film create a perfect
visual foundation for descriptions from almost
all the totaliztic web pages, including this web page,
while the emotional charge contained in them
moves to depth. Thus, in connection with the
explanations and evidence shared on this and
on other totaliztic web pages, the film has the
potential to provide that breakthrough impulse
which changes the course of life of the viewer.
From the feedback opinions, which on this film
reached me so far, it stems quite clearly that it
has just such an effect on the viewer.
The film discussed here illustrates the most important
among my theories, scientific discoveries, inventions
and formal scientific proofs (including the formal scientific
proof that God does exist - described in detail on the web page
god_proof.htm).
However, for shortening the length of it, NO literature
sources were provided, in which this my academic
achievements have been described in detail, nor
it provides complementary explanations, for
example that all technical devices which I invented
and which are illustrated on the film were already
built and proven in practice that they work, and
thus that their use for furthering the development
of humanity is feasible and urgently needed. Therefore,
to enable the people watching this film to obtain also
these additional data, information and explanations,
I developed already three web pages named
portfolio.htm
(i.e. 3 web pages in the same languages in which
are prepared the three language versions of the film),
on which are provided detailed descriptions, links,
promotional leaflets, and various other vital information
regarding the film. These three explanatory web pages
the interested people can find at the following addresses:
http://pajak.org.nz/portfolio.htm,
http://pajak.org.nz/portfolio_pl.htm,
http://pajak.org.nz/portfolio_de.htm,
and also at addresses:
http://totalizm.com.pl/portfolio.htm,
http://totalizm.com.pl/portfolio_pl.htm,
http://totalizm.com.pl/portfolio_de.htm.
In order to effectively promote the film, in these
three languages were also prepared very attractive
graphically, two-page long colour leaflets-posters
of A4 format, that illustrate the content of the film -
see the English-language leaflet shown below.
The reader can easily download any of these
leaflets-posters to own computer (or view it) e.g.
from here, or from the above web pages that explain
the film. On the other hand, after downloading such
a poster, the reader can e.g. print it and pin it to
some notice-board available to him/her, or can
send it to those amongst his/her family and
friends, whose reflections the film would stimulate
and cause that they start to look at the world from
a slightly different angle than previously.
Fig. #J2. Here are both sides of an English
version of the leaflet that encourages the viewing of
YouTube
film entitled "Dr Jan Pajak portfolio". This leaflet
is available in a secure format "JPG" used for
transferring photographs, and the copying of it
is NOT blocked. Therefore, the reader can easily
download it to own computer. After such downloading
the reader can also print it for own reading or for
giving it to friends. Moreover, it can be attached
to emails and posted to people whom the reader
wants to recommend the viewing of film discussed here.
If the reader knows about an unused notice-board
somewhere in the place of work, learning, meetings,
in club, etc., that is cluttered with antique advertisements
or with outdated notices, and the reader is able to
print this leaflet and to post it in there, then it would
be worth doing so to introduce a bit of life, truth
and escape from the everyday triviality. The leaflet
summarizes briefly the most important information
provided in the discussed film, provides the
link to the English language version of this film,
and also explains how this film can be searched
in YouTube or in
Google
using its title for "keywords". This leaflet was also
prepared in the Polish and German langauge
versions - which the reader can inspect, or download
to own computer, either from "Fig. #H2" and "Fig. #H3"
shown under items #H2 and #H3 of the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2017.htm,
or also from "Fig. #B1" and "Fig. #B2" of another web page
entirely devoted to the detailed description of the film and named
portfolio.htm.
(Click onto any page of this leaflet to see it enlarged
or to save it on your computer's hard disk!)
Since neither the leaflet, nor the film promoted by it,
provide literature references which would describe
in detail the ideas presented in the film discussed
here, links to the detailed English descriptions
of these ideas the reader is to find in "part #B"
of the web page named
portfolio.htm,
especially in items #B1 and #B2 of it.
If you prefer to read in Polish
click on the Polish flag below
(Jeśli preferujesz czytanie w języku polskim
kliknij na poniższą flagę)
Date of starting this page: 15 May 1999
Date of the latest updating of this page: 8 August 2018
(Check in "Menu 3" whether there is even a more recent update!)
